Yardstick method

In the present chapter we will summarize results of two different evaluation procedures for the surface roughness of carbon blacks. In the mono-layer regime we refer to the scaling behavior of the estimated BET-surface area with the size of adsorbed probe molecules (yardstick method). On smooth flat surfaces the BET-area is independent of the adsorbed probe or applied yardstick, while on rough surfaces it decreases with increasing probe (yardstick) size due to the inability of the large molecules to explore smaller cavities. This is shown schematically in Fig. 5. 

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... 

In spite of its wide application, the mechanisms of this reaction remain obscure. Many diverse arguments have been published since the reaction was first investigated in 1897 (Bl, C5, C9, F7, J6, M5, P9, R2, S5, W2, W4, Yl, Y4). Cooper et al. (C9) introduced this method as a yardstick for the measurement of volumetric mass-transfer coefficients in gas-liquid contacting. Karow et al. (Kl) later concluded that the sulfite oxidation is suitable for fermentation process scale-up studies. Cooper et al. established that the reaction proceeds at a rate independent of sulfite ion concentration over wide concentration ranges. In their work they considered the sulfite oxidation to be of zero order with respect to both sulfite and sulfate concentration. 

As mentioned in potentiostatic current transient method, when the fractal dimension is determined by using diffusion-limited electrochemical technique, the diffusion layer length acts as a yardstick length.122 In the case of cyclic voltammetry, it was... 

Using these criteria as yardsticks, the first edition has been a success. It is now obsolete, however Because of the increases in both number and types of activities assayed, it is no longer an accurate catalog of enzymatic activities investigated by means of the HPLC method. For this work to continue to serve as a reference source, it would need updating. While it was the obsolescence of the first edition that in part prompted the development of a second edition, there were other considerations as well. These included the introduction of high performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) as a method for separation, the development of microdialysis as a method for collection of samples... 

A radical solution to all of the above-mentioned difficulties is to eliminate the solvent medium entirely and to measure structural effects on heteroaromatic reactivity in the gas phase. During the last decade, a revolution has occurred in the experimental and theoretical approaches to understanding gas-phase ion chemistry. This has occurred as the result of the simultaneous development of several experimental methods for studying organic ion-molecule kinetics and equilibria in the gas phase with precision and range of effects equivalent to or even better than that normally obtained in solution and by very sophisticated molecular orbital calculations. The importance of reactivity studies in the gas phase is twofold. Direct comparison of rates and equilibria in gaseous and condensed media reveals previously inaccessible effects of ion solvation. In addition, reactivity data in the gas phase provide a direct evaluation of the fundamental, intrinsic properties of molecules and represent a unique yardstick against which the validity of theoretical estimates of such properties can be adequately assayed. 

Test methods which utilize the analysis of biochemical reactions or changes in organized macromolecules can be used to evaluate toxicity at a subcellular level. Because of their simplicity, they can be readily standardized and transferred to other laboratories to provide yardstick measurements for varying degrees of dermal toxicity. 

Obviously, use of the approach of eq. [2] can be justified only if it is indeed applicable for the analysis of chemical process on surfaces, and if p can serve for characterization of the effective geometry details and their role in affecting the process. We found that the yardstick sets (a) and (b) are quite general in heterogeneous chemistry (5,6) methods (c),(d), however, are still at an exploratory stage but some interesting results related to surface photochemistry are already at hand and are described below. 

A number of different methods are available for obtaining prefractal pore shape characteristics (Sahimi, 1993 Russ, 1994). We will focus on adsorption and image analysis, since these are the most direct and widely used methods. Avnir et al. (1983) and Pfeifer and Avnir (1983) pioneered the development of adsorption techniques to characterize pore surface properties. Their original idea was that different-sized molecules could be used as yardsticks to measure the area of a prefractal surface as a function of the size of the yardstick. Monolayer coverage (that is typically determined from an adsorption isotherm) for various species with different molecular surface areas, co, can then be shown to satisfy the relation,... 

But one of the most essential needs in the making of a salesman is to have more scientific methods of measuring his performance and giving him corrective guidance. His sales per se, while of ultimate importance, are an inadequate yardstick, as are his relationships with a limited group of customers. This is particularly true in industrial chemical selling which frequently involves multi-level contact. We need better methods of measuring his overall contributions, many of which are subtle indeed. We must be able to better evaluate his time utilization, his empathy, his ambition, his creativity, and his loyalty. 

The other molecular properties to be considered include bond energies, electron distributions, the vibrational spectrum and the energies of various excited states. These properties are by no means an exhaustive list but they do represent some of the most frequently reported ones. They are subject to experimental verification and can therefore be used as yardsticks by which the quality of a given theoretical method can be judged. Furthermore, bond energies and electron distributions (along with the Molecular Orbitals (MOs) implied by the latter) provide the foundations for a discussion of chemical reactivity. 

Professors Kenichi Fukui (Kyoto University) and Roald Hoffmann (Cornell University) received the 1981 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their quantum mechanical studies of chemical reactivity. Their applied theoretical chemistry research is certainly at the core of computational chemistry by today s yardstick. Professor Fukui s name is associated with frontier electrons, which govern the transition states in reactions, while that of Hoffmann is often hyphenated to R. B. Woodward s name in regard to their orbital symmetry rules. In addition, Professor Hoffmann s name is strongly identified with the extended Hiickel molecular orbital method. Not only was he a pioneer in the development of the method, he has continued to use it in almost all of his over 300 papers. 

The third problem concerns the construction of the yardstick itself. We need to know what would have happened to the patients had we treated them otherwise, but whatever approach we use will have its difficulties. For example, we may use the method of historical controls by which we compare our results to results obtained previously with different patients using the alternative treatment (which may be another treatment or no treatment at all), but the problem is that not only are the treatments different so are the patients and they may differ in important ways we cannot even measure. Another alternative that is possible with some diseases is the method of baseline comparisons, whereby patients are compared with their own baseline values. This method is subject to very many possible biases, among which regression to the mean (see below) and time trends (see discussion about multiple sclerosis above) are important. 

The Monte Carlo calculations provide a yardstick against which the results of the cell model theory is compared. The agreement between the two methods is, in general, excellent. 

These results are still preliminary in nature. The structures in the sample database serve both as database structures and as queries, since we have no readily adaptable screening system for specifics. Again, we have no absolute yardstick for the speed of the relaxation method, as compared with other existing methods. The work is currently being extended in a number of directions to provide a firmer basis for generalisation. 

It was also explained in this chapter that the frontal area A is the frontal projection of the area, and could be approximated simply by multiplying 0.85 times the width and the height of a rectac e that outlines the front of a vehicle when you view it from a direction normal to die front windshield. The 0.85 factor is to adjust for rounded corners, open space below the bumper, and so on. Typical drag coefficient values for sports cars are between 0.27 and 0.38, and for sedans the values are between 0.34 and 0.5. This assignment requires you to actually measure the frontal area of a car. Tape a ruler or a yardstick to the bumper of your car. The ruler will serve as a scale. Take a photograph of the car and use any of the methods discussed in this chapter to compute the frontal area of the car. 

---