Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Water barrier test

Peled ef al. [177] also designed a novel MEA in order to improve the water back diffusion from fhe cathode to the anode side. They used a liquid-water barrier layer (LWBL), which consisted of a paste, made out of PTFE and carbon black particles, fhat was inserted in the pores of fhe CFP to form a layer inside fhe paper. Up to seven layers were necessary in order to achieve a uniform layer of 20-50 pm in thickness. Testing showed that the LWBL on the cathode DL creates a hydraulic pressure that forces (or pushes) the water back from fhe cafhode toward the anode, thus improving the cell s water management at different operating conditions. [Pg.248]

Chitosan is a water-insoluble, nontoxic, edible, biodegradable polymer (polysaccharide) that is obtained commercially from chitin by alkaline deacetylation [103]. Chitosan is the second most abundant biopolymer in nature after cellulose. Since chitosan is a polycationic polymer, its high sensitivity to moisture limits its applications. One way to overcome this drawback is to blend the material with humidity resistant polymers such has PLA. Suyatma et al. [104] combined hydrophilic chitosan with hydrophobic PLA (92% L-lactide and 8% mesolactide, Mw = 49,000 Da) by solution and film mixing, resulting in improved water barrier properties and decreased water sensitivity of the chitosan films. However, testing of mechanical and thermal properties revealed that chitosan and PLA blends are incompatible. [Pg.171]

Fig. 4. Radial distribution functions between the centre of a test cavity and the (jxygen atom of the surrounding water. The curves correspond to the different barrier heights for the softcore interaction illustrated in Fig. 3... Fig. 4. Radial distribution functions between the centre of a test cavity and the (jxygen atom of the surrounding water. The curves correspond to the different barrier heights for the softcore interaction illustrated in Fig. 3...
Site characterization studies include a surface-based testing program, potential environmental impact, and societal aspects of the repository. Performance assessment considers both the engineered barriers and the geologic environment. Among features being studied are the normal water flow, some release of carbon-14, and abnormal events such as volcanic activity and human intmsion. The expected date for operation of the repository is 2013. [Pg.230]

Electrochemical tests This group includes the various electrochemical tests that have been proposed and used over the last fifty or so years. These tests include a number of techniques ranging from the measurement of potential-time curves, electrical resistance and capacitance to the more complex a.c. impedance methods. The various methods have been reviewed by Walter . As the complexity of the technique increases, i.e. in the above order, the data that are produced will provide more types of information for the metal-paint system. Thus, the impedance techniques can provide information on the water uptake, barrier action, damaged area and delamination of the coating as well as the corrosion rate and corroded area of the metal. However, it must be emphasised that the more comprehensive the technique the greater the difficulties that will arise in interpretation and in reproducibility. In fact, there is a school of thought that holds that d.c. methods are as reliable as a.c. methods. [Pg.1080]

Pipework and other components should be insulated after the safety pressure test, but usually before prolonged running of the plant, since it is very difficult to remove water and frost once it has formed. Only the low-pressure piping is insulated, where it does not form part of the evaporator, i.e. after the expansion valve, where this may be outside the cooled space, and from the evaporator back to the compressor. Basic materials are cork and the expanded plastics. These are sufficiently rigid to be moulded to the correct shape, remain firmly in place, and support the external vapour barrier which is essential to prevent the ingress of water vapour (see also Chapter 15). [Pg.140]

Hydraulic (Liquid Seal) Flame Arresters Hydraulic (liquid seal) flame arresters are most commonly used in large-pipe-diameter systems where fixed-element flame arresters are either cost-prohibitive or otherwise impractical (e.g., very corrosive gas or where the gas contains solid particles that would quickly plug a conventional arrester element). These arresters contain a liquid, usually water-based, to provide a flame barrier. Figure 23-62 shows one design. Realistic tests are needed to ensure performance, as described in EN 12874 [15]. Note that hydraulic flame arresters may fail at high flow rates, producing a sufficiently high concentration of gas bubbles to allow transmission of flame. This is distinct from the more obvious failure mode caused by failure to maintain adequate liquid level. [Pg.96]

Salt spray test. The model coatings of Table I are of the high solid type used in automotive top coats. Their primary function is not corrosion protection since this is first of all a matter of phosphate layer, electrocoat and/or primer. However, the topcoats may contribute to corrosion protection by their barrier function for water, oxygen and salts. Therefore their permeability is important as one of the factors in the corrosion protection by the total coating system. We feel that a salt spray test of the model coatings directly applied to a steel surface is of little relevance for their corrosion protection performance in a real system. [Pg.113]

CRS which had been phosphated prior to bonding exhibited a significant enhancement of durability and corrosion resistance under the same accelerated conditions (Figure 4). The crystalline barrier layer restricted the exposure of the metal oxide to moisture by reducing the rate of water penetration at the interface. Even samples exposed to the cycle test were able to maintain failure within the adhesive for up to 10 days, after which varying amounts of interfacial failure were noted. Again, room temperature control samples maintained initial joint strength and failure remained cohesive within the adhesive. [Pg.185]

It is sometimes possible to get an indication of how widely the parent compound may distribute in the body from the available physico-chemical data. The sites to which the parent compound distributes (pattern of distribution) once it has entered the systemic circulation are likely to be similar for all routes of administration. In general, substances and their metabohtes that readUy diffuse across membranes wUl distribute throughout the body and may be able to cross the blood-brain and blood-testes barriers, although the concentrations within the brain or testes may be lower than that in the plasma. The rate at which highly water-soluble molecules distribute may be hmited by the rate at which they cross cell membranes and access of such substances to the central nervous system (CNS) or testes is likely to be restricted (though not entirely prevented) by the blood-brain and blood-testes barriers. [Pg.105]

Almost all tests carried out to study the starting process of atmospheric corrosion have been performed in a surface without corrosion products however, in real conditions, the metal is covered with corrosion products after a given time and these products begin to play its role as retarders of the corrosion process in almost all cases. Corrosion products acts as a barrier for oxygen and contaminants diffusion, the free area for the occurrence of the corrosion is lower however, the formation of the surface electrolyte is enhanced. Only in very polluted areas the corrosion products accelerate the corrosion process. Water adsorption isoterms were determined to corrosion products formed in Cuban natural atmospheres[21]. Sorption properties of corrosion products (taking into account their salt content-usually hygroscopics) determine the possibilities of surface adsorption and the possibility of development of corrosion process... [Pg.65]


See other pages where Water barrier test is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.1952]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.117]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]




SEARCH



Testing water

Water test (

© 2024 chempedia.info