Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Variables affecting performance

This section deals not only with the variables pertaining to the headspace process (i.e. those affecting the removal of volatile species) but also with those involved in the passage of such species to the gas phase and the insertion of the compounds removed from the sample into the chromatographic column. [Pg.113]

Solid sample treatments involving the removal of volatile species [Pg.114]

The partition coefficient is the driving force for removal of the volatile species to the gas phase in establishing equilibrium, attainment of which depends on the particular procedure. This coefficient depends on the analyte concentration it decreases with increasing concentration but remains constant over a concentration range that depends on the particular type of compound. Thus, the range of virtual constancy for BTX (benzene, toluene and o-xylene) is 0.1-10 pg/ml as a result, these compounds can only be determined reliably at concentrations below 10 pg/ml [68]. [Pg.114]

The presence and nature of salts also affects — to a lesser extent than temperature — the partition coefficient, and hence the separation efficiency. The effect is illustrated in Fig. 4.13 for BTX at a constant concentration of the target salt the effect of the salt concentration on K is shown in Table 4.3. It should be noted that the phase ratios in the vials for the liquid samples were kept constant at /S, = 3 and /Si = 1  [Pg.117]


In developing an LIBS method, one should tune the equipment to be used in such a way as to obtain optimal values for those variables affecting performance — and hence the final results — to the greatest extent. [Pg.466]

Relatively long reaction times may be required in biofilm bioreactors to obtain the required MTBE-effluent concentrations. For example, Kharoune et al. [96] report a 98% removal of MTBE with a 24h HRT, while the performance declined significantly with a HRT of 13 h. However, Zein et al. [42] reported that for the BCR, the important variables affecting performance where sludge age and high biomass sohds, not HRT. In general, lower effluent MTBE concentrations can be achieved with membrane bioreactors, as transport limitations of contaminants in bacterial biofihns are circumvented [42,55,56]. On the other hand, Pruden et al. [38] report lower TBA effluent concentrations obtained with the fluidized bed bioreactor setup. [Pg.181]

Panels are exposed on ocean beaches. The difficulties in such tests are discussed in Reference 97. The steel used is a critical variable (98). Film thickness, evenness of application, flash-off time, baking time and temperature, and many other variables affect performance. Results obtained with laboratory panels can be quite different than results with actual production products. It is desirable to paint test sections on ships, bridges, and chemical storage tanks, and observe their condition over the years. [Pg.1428]

The information given for the commercial oils represents data critically selected from pubUshed rehable sources or, in some cases, analyses performed in the authors laboratories on authentic oil samples. These data are provided as a general guide to composition only and are not meant to be exclusive of analytical results obtained by other researchers on similar oils. Where the Hterature provides ranges of composition, these have, in several cases, been included. Many variables affect the composition of essential oils. [Pg.299]

Spray Correlations. One of the most important aspects of spray characterization is the development of meaningful correlations between spray parameters and atomizer performance. The parameters can be presented as mathematical expressions that involve Hquid properties, physical dimensions of the atomizer, as well as operating and ambient conditions that are likely to affect the nature of the dispersion. Empirical correlations provide useful information for designing and assessing the performance of atomizers. Dimensional analysis has been widely used to determine nondimensional parameters that are useful in describing sprays. The most common variables affecting spray characteristics include a characteristic dimension of atomizer, d Hquid density, Pjj Hquid dynamic viscosity, ]ljj, surface tension. O pressure, AP Hquid velocity, V gas density, p and gas velocity, V. ... [Pg.332]

Performance of Bead Mills Materials processed in stirred-media mills are listed in Table 20-17. Variables affecting the milling process are listed below. [Pg.1854]

Apart from the degree of novelty of a process event, its complexity (e.g., the range of operations to be carried out), the interrelationships of the process variables involved and the required accuracy, will affect performance. Startup and shutdown operations are examples of tasks which, although are not entirely unfamiliar, involve a high degree of complexity. [Pg.109]

A tendency for greater manual variability which affects performance of machine-paced tasks, particularly in the manufacturing industry... [Pg.141]

The only other variables that affect performance are the inlet-discharge valves, which control flow into and out of each cylinder. Although reciprocating compressors can use a variety of valve designs, it is crucial that the valves perform reliably. If they are damaged and fail to operate at the proper time or do not seal properly, overall compressor performance will be substantially reduced. [Pg.564]

The computer sends set points (built on which performance characteristics of the product must have) to the process controller that constantly feeds back to the computer to signal whether or not the set of points are in fact maintained. The systems are programmed to act when key variables affecting product quality deviate beyond set limits (3). [Pg.334]

Because the templates compete for amplification and, in the case of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), also for reverse transcription, any variable affecting amplification has the same effect on both. Thus, the ratio of PCR products reflects the ratio of the initial amounts of the two templates as demonstrated by the function C/W=C (l+ )"/Wi(l+ )n, where Cand Ware the amounts of competitor and wild-type product, respectively, and C and W are the initial amounts of competitor and wild-type template, respectively, (Clementi etal., 1993). From this linear relationship, it could be concluded that a single concentration of competitor could be sufficient for quantitating unknown amounts of wild-type templates. However, in practice, the precise analysis of two template species in very different amounts has proved difficult and cPCRs using three to four competitor concentrations within the expected range of wild-type template concentrations are usually performed. In a recent study of different standardization concepts in quantitative RT-PCR assays, coamplification on a single concentration of a competitor with wild-type template was comparable to using multiple competitor concentrations and was much easier to perform (Haberhausen et al, 1998). [Pg.214]

The ET cover cannot be tested at every landfill site so it is necessary to extrapolate the results from sites of known performance to specific landfill sites. The factors that affect the hydrologic design of ET covers encompass several scientific disciplines and there are numerous interactions between factors. As a consequence, a comprehensive computer model is needed to evaluate the ET cover for a site.48 The model should effectively incorporate soil, plant, and climate variables, and include their interactions and the resultant effect on hydrology and water balance. An important function of the model is to simulate the variability of performance in response to climate variability and to evaluate cover response to extreme events. Because the expected life of the cover is decades, possibly centuries, the model should be capable of estimating long-term performance. In addition to a complete water balance, the model should be capable of estimating long-term plant biomass production, need for fertilizer, wind and water erosion, and possible loss of primary plant nutrients from the ecosystem. [Pg.1064]

The foregoing examples illustrate the relationships among the variables as they affect performance (collection efficiency) and pressure drop. [Pg.811]

When developing methods for QC, it has been demonstrated that a suitable pre-run rinse step is fundamental to guarantee a consistent performance. The proposed pre-run capillary rinse routine has shown to result in robust and reliable CE methods that can withstand the requirements of a QC lab. Because of many different variables affecting the outcome of a CE method, it is recommended to apply DOE approaches as much as possible during... [Pg.93]

To produce the desired pyrotechnic effect from a given mixture, the chemist must be aware of the large number of variables that can affect performance. These factors must be held constant from batch to batch and day to day to achieve reproducible behavior. Substantial deviations can result from variations in any of the following [2] ... [Pg.53]

A condition in which all operating variables that can affect performance remain within ranges that the system or process performs consistently and as intended. [Pg.99]

Section I identified the performance criteria that determine the suitability of a given electrode for an electroanalytical application. We now turn to the question of what aspects of the carbon determine its performance and electrochemical behavior. Since the structure of sp2 carbon materials is more complex than that of pure metals like Pt, there are more structural variables that affect behavior. As a consequence, sp2 carbon can vary widely in conductivity, stability, hardness, porosity, etc., and care must be taken to choose and prepare the carbon material for an electrochemical application. Before discussing particular carbon electrode materials, we first consider which structural variables affect the electrochemical observables discussed in Section II. [Pg.299]


See other pages where Variables affecting performance is mentioned: [Pg.383]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.2168]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.2168]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.1774]    [Pg.2498]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.255]   


SEARCH



Performance Variables

Performance variability

© 2024 chempedia.info