Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quality control compliance

In addition to the validation of the analytical method, routine methods should include several controls to ensure the quality of the reported data [32,37]. The most usual approach consists of the injection of blank samples spiked at the LOQ and 10 x LOQ levels, that is, quality controls (QC), in each batch of samples analyzed. For quality control compliance, a QC recovery range of 60—140% is used in routine multiresidue analysis [32]. Recoveries outside this range would require reanalysis of the sample batch. Results for samples that exceed MRL residue levels must be supported by individual recovery results in the same batch within the range of the mean recovery (70—120%) 2 RSD (relative standard deviation), at least for the confirmatory analyses. [Pg.328]

In addition to fulfilling the in-house requirements for quality control, state and local air monitoring networks which are collecting data for compliance purposes are required to have an external performance audit on an annual basis. Under this program, an independent organization supplies externally calibrated sources of air pollutant gases to be measured by the instrumentation undergoing audit. An audit report summarizes the performance of the instruments. If necessary, further action must be taken to eliminate any major discrepancies between the internal and external calibration results. [Pg.224]

Although written reports are the inspecting authority s end product they by no means comprise the whole of the professional service that is supplied or is available on request. The authority s quality assurance objective is likely to be on the lines of client satisfaction allied to compliance with contractual obligations . Although reports are almost certainly monitored, they are a poor indicator of the quality of the examination, and the authority s quality control will rely less on report... [Pg.146]

This system assures overall compliance with cGMPs and internal procedures and specifications. The system includes the quality control unit and all of its review and approval duties (e.g. change control, reprocessing, batch release, annual record review, validation protocols, and reports, etc.). It includes all product defect evaluations and evaluation of returned and salvaged drug products. [Pg.247]

The sponsor is responsible for implementing and maintaining quality assurance and quality control systems with written SOPs [standard operating procedures] to ensure that trials are conducted and data are generated, documented (recorded), and reported in compliance with the protocol, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s). ... [Pg.7]

In practice, this means that the terms of the agreement must be understood and agreed by everyone involved and that compliance with the agreed terms must be monitored in a way that ensures credibility. It must be kept in mind that a supply-chain-wide CCP-based quality control system can be more or less complex, and that it is imperative for success that the effort spent on control is proportional to the purpose of the system. The credibility in short, often personalised, chains will have a different foundation from that required in complex chains producing labelled, prepackaged foods (Kjaemes etal., 2006). [Pg.504]

Rao et al.20 demonstrated a fluorescence polarization immunoassay for evaluating serum concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, and doxepin) with respect to nonresponse, compliance, therapeutic window, and influences of age, sex, substance abuse, and toxicity. Abbott Laboratories TDx/TDxFLx Toxicology Tricyclic Assay FPIA (fluorescence polarization immunoassay) was used. This assay of 50 /uL samples contained tricyclic antidepressant antibodies raised in rabbits and fluorescein-labeled tricyclic antidepressant as a tracer. The assay was calibrated with imipramine in the range of 75 to 1000 fig/L (268 to 3571 nmol/L). Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation for internal quality control samples from the manufacturer were 4.2 and 4.7%, respectively. The limits of detection were 72,71,64, and 72 nmol/L for amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, and doxepin, respectively. This high-throughput immunoassay was easy to use although amitriptyline, dosulepine, desipramine, and nortriptyline showed cross-reactivities ranging from 74 to 100%. [Pg.301]

This Chapter includes the requirements for inspections by owner, quality control examinations, nondestructive examinations, and specified tests by the construction organization (manufacturer, fabricator, or erector). Inspection, examination, and testing shall be in compliance with the general requirements of Chapters GR-4 and GR-6, as well as the applicable specific requirements in this Chapter and engineering design. [Pg.123]

By using the combination of specific method accreditation and generic accreditation it will be possible for laboratories to be accredited for all the analyses of which they are capable and competent to undertake. Method performance validation data demonstrating that the method was fit-for-purpose shall be demonstrated before the test result is released and method performance shall be monitored by on-going quality-control techniques where applicable. It will be necessary for laboratories to be able to demonstrate quality-control procedures to ensure compliance with the EN 45001 Standard,3 an example of which would be compliance with the ISO/AOAC/IUPAC Guidelines on Internal Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry Laboratories.12... [Pg.85]

ISO, IUPAC and AOAC INTERNATIONAL have co-operated to produce agreed protocols on the Design, Conduct and Interpretation of Collaborative Studies 14 and on the Proficiency Testing of [Chemical] Analytical Laboratories .11 The Working Group that produced these protocols has prepared a further protocol on the internal quality control of data produced in analytical laboratories. The document was finalised in 1994 and published in 1995 as the Harmonised Guidelines For Internal Quality Control In Analytical Chemistry Laboratories .12 The use of the procedures outlined in the Protocol should aid compliance with the accreditation requirements specified above. [Pg.85]

The first and foremost element for GMP is the quality system. This can be divided into Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC). QA is a total system approach. It sets out the compliance policies and procedures for all facets of drug manufacturing. QC is the practical extension of QA. The role of QC is concerned with inspection and testing of the manufacturing environment, raw materials, in-process intermediates, and finished products. [Pg.288]

Quality System This consists of procedures and specifications to assure the overall compliance for the facility. Quality control, change control, batch release, internal audits, and quality records are part of the quality system. [Pg.326]

Baseline separation of the cephalosporin antibiotic cephradine, its main impurity cephalexin, and other related impurities was achieved by MEKC. The method was validated in compliance with the USP XXII analytical performance parameters and the results were comparable with a validated LC method, depicting CE to be a valuable alternative technique to LC in pharmaceutical quality control. In most cases, the amount of impurities relative to the main compound measured by MEKC is similar to that obtained by LC. However, some reports reveal that there are differences in number and amount of impurities between MEKC and LC analysis. MEKC permitted the determination of seven known and three unknown impurities in cefotaxime and the results were in good agreement with those of LC. ° MEKC yielded a higher amount of the cefotaxime dimer but a lower amount of an unidentified impurity with respect to LC. The differences may be due to the easier formation of the dimer in the aqueous sample solvent used in MEKC compared to the hydroorganic... [Pg.287]

Congress attempted to correct that deficiency and other air pollution problems in a series of amendments to the 1963 act passed in 1965, 1966, 1967, and 1969. The 1965 amendments, for example, authorized the secretary of health, education and welfare to establish nationwide standards for automobile exhaust emissions. This legislation and later amendments also authorized the surgeon general to study the effects of air pollutants on human health, expanded local air quality programs, set compliance deadlines for meeting new air quality standards, established air quality control regions (AQCRs), and authorized research on low emission fuels and more fuel-efficient automobiles. [Pg.9]

The quality control manager is responsible for following the procedure. The quality assurance manager is responsible for SOP compliance. [Pg.191]


See other pages where Quality control compliance is mentioned: [Pg.12]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.921]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.805]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.287 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info