Tort law

Many tort plaintiffs have tried to assert claims for damages under TSCA, and courts have uniformly held that TSCA does not support a private right of action for damages.  

It is likely that tort plaintiffs will point to TSCA violations as evidence of negligence. A TSCA violation alone is not sufficient to claim negligence. 

Section 408(f)(1)(B) of the FFDCA specifically contemplates use of TSCA 4 test rules to gather data on endocrine effects of pesticide residue chemicals. However, this portion of the FFDCA is not an independent grant of authority to use TSCA to gather information on a pesticide that is excluded from TSCA s scope. 

The labelingprovisionsoftheOccupationalHealthandSafety Administration s Hazard Communication Standard do not apply to any chemical substance or mixture that is subject to a specific labeling requirement under TSCA.  

Information Requirements for All Reportable Chemical Substances Made or Imported in Quantities of Twenty-five Thousand Pounds or More 

---

The tort laws have been impeding new biomaterial and medical device developments by the large companies. It is very difficult for them tojustify the financial risk incurred from the relatively low level of their sales. Action is being taken to change the laws. 

Philip D. Oliver, Rejecting the Whipping-Boy Approach to Tort Law, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal 14 (1991), n.p. 

Landes, WiUiam M., and Richard A. Posner (1987). The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge Harvard University Press. 

Tort Law as a Regulatory Regime for Catastrophic Injuries. Journal of... 

The Current Insurance Crisis and Modem Tort Law. Yale Law Journal... 

Tort law is a branch of the civil law that awards damages for violations of societal norms. By an award of compensatory damages, tort law seeks to... 

Tort law uses an objective standard in judging behavior it does not seek to determine whether a person performed as well as he or she could have done but whether the performance met the standard society imposes for all of its members acting under the same circumstances (28). The objective approach looks at how an ordinary reasonable person would react in the same situation. It does not consider a person s individual unique traits, but creates a fictitious majoritarian figure and utilizes that character as a standard. The rationale for the use of this method is that it creates uniformity in the law and ensures that society as a whole can rely on a certain standard of care from their fellow citizens. 

Tort law seeks to compensate a person who has been harmed by the wrongful conduct of another and also hopes to deter similar injuries. Tort law considers a person s decision to take a particular action and the risk involved when determining liability. As the cases above illustrate, sleep disorders and sleep deprivation can play an important role in choice and risk. Additionally, physicians who treat patients for sleep disorders have an obligation to warn their patients of the risks of the sleep condition and any treatment rendered. Failure to inform then-patient of the risks could lead to injuries to others, for which the physician might be liable. 

Civil liability (tort law) Stuart Johnson, R.Ph., is manager of Johnson s Apothecary, a community pharmacy. When he arrived at the pharmacy today, there was a frantic voice-mail message left for him in the middle of the night while the pharmacy was closed. It seems that a staff pharmacist, Dave, made a dispensing error yesterday, and Suzie Jones, a 3-year-old child, was taken unconscious by ambulance to the local community hospital emergency room at 2 00 a.m. Suzie and her family had just moved to town about 2 weeks ago, and yesterday was their first visit to Johnson s Apothecary. 

From this case, describe violations of both state and federal law and the tort law implications (i.e., potential for being sued). 

Parson Woodforde concluded that a cat s tail was of the greatest efficacy for such a malady. While the good parson s reasoning was logical, his premise was incorrect. Testimonials often involve the fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc, that is, the assumption that because two events occur sequentially, the first is the cause of the second. (In tort law, causation must be proved.) The swelling of the eyelid may have abated of its own accord even in the absence of the tail of a black cat. Moreover, there is selection bias in testimonials a lack of consequence rarely results in a testimonial and dead men tell no tales. 

In June 1988 the tobacco industry lost its first court case involving liability in the death of a smoker after heavy, chronic cigarette use. Although the decision was subsequently reversed in 1990, it represents a significant application of tort law. The question of addiction liability was the core of a landmark class action case against the tobacco industry in federal court in New Orleans (Castano v. The American Tobacco Co.). (This case was settled as part of the general settlement see later discussion). 

On the other hand, there are questions of liability for damages which usually fall under the tort law provisions of a specific domestic legislation. These questions arise among the persons involved in the EIA process (e.g., the developer, the... 

The VICP largely replaces traditional tort law for deciding vaccine-related injuries and was designed to stabilize the vaccine market by decreasing liability costs of manufacturers and health care providers and to ease reward recovery by eligible claimants... 

Regulatory [agencies]. .. make prophylactic rules governing human exposure. This methodology results from the preventive perspective that the agencies adopt in order to reduce public exposure to harmful substances. The agencies threshold of proof is reasonably lower than that appropriate in tort law, which traditionally make[s] more particularized inquiries into cause and effect and requires a plaintiff to prove that it is more likely than not that another individual has caused him or her harm. ... 

Ricci, P. E., and Gray, N. (1998). Towards a new way to deal with toxic torts Risks in toxic tort law. Part 1 Probabilistic causation and legal causation. Univ New South Wales Law J 21, 787—806. 

Du Perron EC, van Boomi Willem H (2003) Country Report The Netherlands. In Ulrich M (ed.) The Impact of Social Security Law on Tort Law. Springer, Wien New York, pp. 149-164... 

As mentioned earlier in this chapter, Congress has considered adopting national tort law standards, including proposals to protect manufacturers from punitive damage awards for products approved by the FDA unless die manufacturer has acted fraudulendy. 

Faced with the plaintiffs inability to identify the manufacturer which caused her injury on the one hand, and the seriousness of the injury to the defenseless plaintiff on the other, the court laid a foundation for its extension of tort law by discussing how various existing theories of liability utilized by the plaintiff were inadequate. 

The Commission is, however, permitted by the FHSA to regulate only mechanical hazards that present an unreasonable risk of consumer injury. This means that the Commission must determine (1) that the risk posed by the hazard is an unreasonable one, and (2) that there is a sufficient nexus between the regulation and the hazard it is designed to prevent. The requirement that the risk be unreasonable necessarily involves a balancing test like that familiar in tort law The regulation may issue if the severity of the injury that may result from the product, factored by the likelihood of the injury, offsets the harm the regulation itself imposes upon manufacturers and consumers. [559 F.2d at 789.]... 

Dewees, D. (1992fl). The comparative efficacy of tort law and regulation for environmental protection. Geneva Papers on RiskandInsurance, 65,446-67. 

Dewees, D. (1992h) Tort law and the deterrence of environmental pollution. In Innovation in Environmental Policy, Economic and Legal Aspects of Recent Developments in Environmental Enforcement and Liability, ed.T. H.Tietenberg, pp. 139-64. Eiger, Brookfield. 

Product liability has become one of the fastest-growing, and perhaps the most economically significant, applications of tort law. Pharmaceutical companies have been defendants in some of the most widely publicized and costly product liability lawsuits in the USA and Europe, prompting many companies to lobby vigorously for tort reform and prepare years in advance for the possibility of litigation (Nace et al, 1997). The liability burden of pharmaceutical companies has been described as extremely disproportionate to their sales when compared with other manufacturing industries (The Progress and Freedom Foundation 1996,... 

Strict liability is a principle of both tort law and contract law (i.e. purely under the civil law), which provides that a seller of a product is liable without fault for damage caused by that product if it is sold... 

---