The employers responsibilities

The employer is the primary body responsible for accident prevention at the workplaces. Although the legislation varies from country to country, typical duties of the employer are to ensure that  

In the USA, the proposed safety and health programme rule requires employers to set up safety and health programmes to manage workplace safety and health (OSHA, 1989). The aim is to reduce injuries, illnesses and fatalities by systematically achieving compliance with the occupational safety and health regulations. 

Let us look closer at the Norwegian internal control regulations, which are a typical example of the types of requirements that the employers have to meet. According to this legislation, there must be routines inside the company to  

Ensure that the employees have adequate knowledge and skills in the area of SHE work  

Ensure that the employees participate in the SHE work in order to utilise their collective experiences  

---

Safety professionals should also be aware that the employment status also has a direct bearing on the safety function as identified in the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. In the OSH Act, the creation of an employer-employee relationship is essential in order for the employer to potentially be found liable for violations of the OSH Act by OSHA. The primary question that often arises is whether a company or organization can be found liable for alleged violations under the OSH Act when its own employees are exposed to a hazard created by another employer or when the employer responsible for creating the hazard does not affect any of its own employees. Safety professionals have often utilized the lack of an employer-employee relationship as one of the defenses against an issued violation. 

Legal liability imposed on an employer making the employer responsible for paying damages to an employee injured by the employer s negligence. Generally replaced... 

It is the duty of every employer to provide a safe place of work, maintain plant and equipment safely and ensure safe use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances. Furthermore under the same legislation, it is the employers responsibility to provide adequate instruction, training and information and to conduct his undertaking in such a manner that people who are not in his employ are not exposed to risks to then-health and safety. It is also the duty of employees not to endanger themselves or others by their acts or omissions and to cooperate with their employer as necessary to comply with current legislation and requirements. ... 

If a worksite has multiple employers, citations are issued to any employers whose employees are exposed to hazards. In addition, the employer creating the hazard, the employer responsible for jobsite safety and health conditions, and the employer who has responsibility for correcting the hazard are also cited. 

Your company is required to have a written PPE program if your employees use PPE in conjunction with their duties. Of course PPE is only to be used when engineering controls and administrative controls cannot be used to protect the employee. Under 1910.132, PPE refers to equipment to protect eyes, face, head, and extremities protective clothing respiratory devices and protective shields and barriers. If employees provide their own protective equipment, the employer is also responsible for it. The employer responsibilities include... 

Asbestos hazards at a multi-employer work site shall be abated by the contractor who created or controls the source of asbestos contamination. For example, if there is a significant breach of an enclosure containing Class I work, the employer responsible for erecting the enclosure shall repair the breach immediately. 

A. The FOM (OSHA Field Operations Manual) states that, on multi-employer worksites, citations shall be issued to employers whose employees are exposed to hazards, unless such an employer meets all of the conditions for a legitimate defense. If an employed meets all the conditions for a legitimate defense, he or she will not be cited. In addition, if employees of more than one employer are exposed, citations will normally be issued to each of those employers, the employers responsible for correcting or ensuring the correction of the conditions, and/or the employer causing the conditions. If all employers on a worksite with employees exposed to a hazard meet the conditions for a legitimate defense, then the citation shall be issued to only the employers who are responsible for creating the hazard and/or who are in the best position to correct the hazard or to ensure its correction. 

The role of an SDS is to provide detailed information on each hazardous chemical, including its potential hazardous effects, its physical and chemical characteristics, and recommendations for appropriate protective measimes. This information is usefid to you as the employer responsible for designing protective programs, as well as to your employees. 

Where two or more employers share a workplace where an explosive atmosphere may occur, the employer responsible for the workplace is to coordinate the implementation of the measures required by these regulations (regulation 11). 

The emphasis is now shifting away from the employer responsible towards the individual responsible . One reason for the introduction of the offence of corporate killing is to allow individual directors to be more clearly... 

It is the employers responsibility to provide a workplace free from hazards that could cause death or serious physical harm and this includes workplace violence. Thus, the employer of today must take into consideration the security of his or her workplace to endsure that employees can perform their work without the interference of outside sources of danger. 

The low MW power levels conuuonly employed in TREPR spectroscopy do not require any precautions to avoid detector overload and, therefore, the fiill time development of the transient magnetization is obtained undiminished by any MW detection deadtime. (3) Standard CW EPR equipment can be used for TREPR requiring only moderate efforts to adapt the MW detection part of the spectrometer for the observation of the transient response to a pulsed light excitation with high time resolution. (4) TREPR spectroscopy proved to be a suitable teclmique for observing a variety of spin coherence phenomena, such as transient nutations [16], quantum beats [17] and nuclear modulations [18], that have been usefi.il to interpret EPR data on light-mduced spm-correlated radical pairs. 

Two different types of dynamic test have been devised to exploit this possibility. The first and more easily interpretable, used by Gibilaro et al [62] and by Dogu and Smith [63], employs a cell geometrically similar to the Wicke-Kallenbach apparatus, with a flow of carrier gas past each face of the porous septum. A sharp pulse of tracer is injected into the carrier stream on one side, and the response of the gas stream composition on the other side is then monitored as a function of time. Interpretation is based on the first two moments of the measured response curve, and Gibilaro et al refer explicitly to a model of the medium with a blmodal pore... 

Researchers at the MoneU Center (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) are using a variety of electrophysical and biochemical techniques to characterize the ionic currents produced in taste and olfactory receptor cells by chemical stimuli. These studies are concerned with the identification and pharmacology of the active ion channels and mode of production. One of the techniques employed by the MoneU researchers is that of "patch clamp." This method aUows for the study of the electrical properties of smaU patches of the ceU membrane. The program at MoneU has determined that odors stimulate intraceUular enzymes to produce cycUc adenosine 3, 5 -monophosphate (cAMP). This production of cAMP promotes opening of the ion channel, aUowing cations to enter and excite the ceU. MoneU s future studies wiU focus on the connection of cAMP, and the production of the electrical response to the brain. The patch clamp technique also may be a method to study the specificity of receptor ceUs to different odors, as weU as the adaptation to prolonged stimulation (3). 

Are there appropriate planning, training and drills and equipment for response to emergencies (Note In some facilities, the employer s plan IS to evacuate and call the fire department.) If no, explain. 

Memory requirements for one-dimensional eontinuum dynamies ealeulations are minimal by the standards of eurrent hardware. Thus, sufTieiently fine zoning ean be used in sueh ealeulations to eapture details of material response and provide a rigorous test of fidelity for the numerieal models employed. The ability to use fine zoning also ensures that any diserepaneies between ealeulation and experiment ean be attributed, with eonsiderable eonfidenee, to Inadequaeies in the material response model. In faet, most desktop workstations have suffieient eomputing horsepower and memory to meet the eom-putating needs in one-dimensional material response studies. 

The for-end loop in examp88.m that employs equation (8.76), while appearing very simple, is in faet very powerful sinee it ean be used to simulate the time response of any size of multivariable system to any number and manner of inputs. If A and B are time-varying, then A(r) and B(r) should be ealeulated eaeh time around the loop. The author has used this teehnique to simulate the time response of a 14 state-variable, 6 input time-varying system. Example 8.10 shows the ease in whieh the eontrollability and observability matriees M and N ean be ealeulated using c t r b and ob s v and their rank eheeked. 

Equation (5) was examined by Scott and Reese [1] employing mixtures of nitrobenzene and fully deuterated nitrobenzene as the test sample. Their retention times were 8.927 min. and 9.061 min., respectively, giving a difference of 8.04 seconds. The separation ratio of the two solutes was 1.023 and the efficiencies of the front and rear portions of the peaks were 5908 and 3670 theoretical plates, respectively. The detector was, not surprisingly, found to have the same response to both solutes, i.e., a = (3. Thus, inserting these values in equation (5),... 

The employer is responsible for making sure that both requirements are met before final certification is granted. 

Expert in the operations of equipment, not necessarily employees of the employer, and may perform temporary emergency response Examples crane or earth-moving equipment operations, or medical personnel whose typically duties do not include treating contaminated patients. 

The use of proper PPE is an integral part of many jobs when dealing with hazardous waste. OSHA standard 1910.132 of 1998 requires an assessment be eondueted to determine the appropriate PPE for eyes, faee, head, and extremities whenever hazards eneountered are eapable of eausing injury or impairment in the funetion of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physieal eontaet. Aeeording to the PPE standard, it is the employer s responsibility to determine if hazards are present (or likely to be present). If the employer determines that hazards are present, the employer should ehoose the types of PPE that will proteet affeeted employees from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment [1]. 

Unless employers ean demonstrate that their operation does not involve employee exposure or the reasonable possibility for employee exposure to safety or health hazards, they should eomply with the standard. To determine if your partieular situation is eovered by the emergeney response provisions of the standard, examine the tasks of your workers to determine if they will be assigned a role or funetion as part of a response to a release of hazardous waste [2]. 

The employer is responsible for developing and implementing written operating procedures that provide dear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information by addressing requirements, responsibilities, and procedures for ... 

In the construction of new plants and equipment, the employer is responsible that the equipment is suitable for the process application. Checks and inspections are performed to assure that equipment is installed properly, and consistent with design specifications and the manufacturer s instructions. Maintenance materials, instructions, spare parts and equipment will he available... 

---