Surfaces electrode/solution interface

On the electrode side of the double layer the excess charges are concentrated in the plane of the surface of the electronic conductor. On the electrolyte side of the double layer the charge distribution is quite complex. The potential drop occurs over several atomic dimensions and depends on the specific reactivity and atomic stmcture of the electrode surface and the electrolyte composition. The electrical double layer strongly influences the rate and pathway of electrode reactions. The reader is referred to several excellent discussions of the electrical double layer at the electrode—solution interface (26-28). 

Eigure 3 schematically depicts the stmcture of the electrode—solution interface. The inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) refers to the distance of closest approach of specifically adsorbed ions, generally anions to the electrode surface. In aqueous systems, water molecules adsorb onto the electrode surface. 

Transport of a species in solution to and from an electrode/solution interface may occur by migration, diffusion and convection although in any specific system they will not necessarily be of equal importance. However, at the steady state all steps involved in the electrode reaction must proceed at the same rate, irrespective of whether the rate is controlled by a slow step in the charge transfer process or by the rate of transport to or from the electrode surface. It follows that the rate of transport must equal the rate of charge transfer ... 

Measurement of the differential capacitance C = d /dE of the electrode/solution interface as a function of the electrode potential E results in a curve representing the influence of E on the value of C. The curves show an absolute minimum at E indicating a maximum in the effective thickness of the double layer as assumed in the simple model of a condenser [39Fru]. C is related to the electrocapillary curve and the surface tension according to C = d y/dE. Certain conditions have to be met in order to allow the measured capacity of the electrochemical double to be identified with the differential capacity (see [69Per]). In dilute electrolyte solutions this is generally the case. 

In situ infrared spectroscopy allows one to obtain stracture-specific information at the electrode-solution interface. It is particularly useful in the study of electrocat-alytic reactions, molecular adsorption, and the adsorption of ions at metal surfaces. 

Interfacial water molecules play important roles in many physical, chemical and biological processes. A molecular-level understanding of the structural arrangement of water molecules at electrode/electrolyte solution interfaces is one of the most important issues in electrochemistry. The presence of oriented water molecules, induced by interactions between water dipoles and electrode and by the strong electric field within the double layer has been proposed [39-41]. It has also been proposed that water molecules are present at electrode surfaces in the form of clusters [42, 43]. Despite the numerous studies on the structure of water at metal electrode surfaces using various techniques such as surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [44, 45], surface infrared spectroscopy [46, 47[, surface enhanced infrared spectroscopy [7, 8] and X-ray diffraction [48, 49[, the exact nature of the structure of water at an electrode/solution interface is still not fully understood. 

In recent years,3 4 however, there has been renewed interest in the study of the electrode/solution interface due in part to the development of new spectroscopic techniques such as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,5-7 electrochemically modulated infrared reflectance spectroscopy and related techniques,8,9 second-harmonic generation,10-12 and others which give information about the identity and orientation of molecular species in the interfacial... 

As mentioned previously, this can be attributed in part to the lack of structure-sensitive techniques that can operate in the presence of a condensed phase. Ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) surface spectroscopic techniques such as low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and others have been applied to the study of electrochemical interfaces, and a wealth of information has emerged from these ex situ studies on well-defined electrode surfaces.15"17 However, the fact that these techniques require the use of UHV precludes their use for in situ studies of the electrode/solution interface. In addition, transfer of the electrode from the electrolytic medium into UHV introduces the very serious question of whether the nature of the surface examined ex situ has the same structure as the surface in contact with the electrolyte and under potential control. Furthermore, any information on the solution side of the interface is, of necessity, lost. 

The distribution of potential in TC is practically the same as that near the flat surface if the electrolyte concentration is about 1 mol/1 [2], So the discharge of TC may be considered as that of a double electric layer formed at the flat electrode surface/electrolyte solution interface, and hence, an equivalent circuit for the TC discharge may be presented as an RC circuit, where C is the double layer capacitance and R is the electrolyte resistance. 

A comparison of the products of AP hydrolysis of HQDP (HQ), PP, and 1-NP using cyclic voltammetry revealed that HQ produced well-defined peaks, and that the oxidation of HQ is reversible. More importantly, no apparent passivation of the electrode surface was observed even at high millimolar concentrations after 50 scans. Following a series of investigations, this non-fouling nature of HQ was attributed to the non-accumulation of its oxidation products on the electrode surface and the good diffusional properties of HQ at the electrode-solution interface. Another positive feature of HQDP as a substrate for AP is a tenfold greater oxidation current response of HQ compared to those obtained in the presence of PP or 1-NP. Overall, HQDP provides a suitable and attractive alternative substrate system for AP in the development of amperometric immunosensors. 

Very often, the electrode-solution interface can be represented by an equivalent circuit, as shown in Fig. 5.10, where Rs denotes the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte solution, Cdl, the double layer capacitance, Rct the charge (or electron) transfer resistance that exists if a redox probe is present in the electrolyte solution, and Zw the Warburg impedance arising from the diffusion of redox probe ions from the bulk electrolyte to the electrode interface. Note that both Rs and Zw represent bulk properties and are not expected to be affected by an immunocomplex structure on an electrode surface. On the other hand, Cdl and Rct depend on the dielectric and insulating properties of the electrode-electrolyte solution interface. For example, for an electrode surface immobilized with an immunocomplex, the double layer capacitance would consist of a constant capacitance of the bare electrode (Cbare) and a variable capacitance arising from the immunocomplex structure (Cimmun), expressed as in Eq. (4). 

Similar to those observed with the cysteine-modified electrode in Cu, Zn-SOD solution [98], CVs obtained at the MPA-modified Au electrode in phosphate buffer containing Fe-SOD or Mn-SOD at different potential scan rates (v) clearly show that the peak currents obtained for each SOD are linear with v (not v 1/2) over the potential scan range from 10 to 1000 mVs-1. This observation reveals that the electron transfer of the SODs is a surface-confined process and not a diffusion-controlled one. The previously observed cysteine-promoted surface-confined electron transfer process of Cu, Zn-SOD has been primarily elucidated based on the formation of a cysteine-bridged SOD-electrode complex oriented at an electrode-solution interface, which is expected to sufficiently facilitate a direct electron transfer between the metal active site in SOD and Au electrodes. Such a model appears to be also suitable for the SODs (i.e. Cu, Zn-SOD, Fe-SOD, and Mn-SOD) with MPA promoter. The so-called... 

In addition to the universal concern for catalytic selectivity, the following reasons could be advanced to argue why an electrochemical scheme would be preferred over a thermal approach (i) There are experimental parameters (pH, solvent, electrolyte, potential) unique only to the electrode-solution interface which can be manipulated to dictate a certain reaction pathway, (ii) The presence of solvent and supporting electrolyte may sufficiently passivate the electrode surface to minimize catalytic fragmentation of starting materials. (iii) Catalyst poisons due to reagent decomposition may form less readily at ambient temperatures, (iv) The chemical behavior of surface intermediates formed in electrolytic solutions can be closely modelled after analogous well-characterized molecular or cluster complexes (1-8). (v)... 

The central issue which has to be addressed in any comprehensive study of electrode-surface phenomena is the determination of an unambiguous correlation between interfacial composition, interfacial structure, and interfacial reactivity. This principal concern is of course identical to the goal of fundamental studies in heterogeneous catalysis at gas-solid interfaces. However, electrochemical systems are far more complicated since a full treatment of the electrode-solution interface must incorporate not only the compact (inner) layer but also the boundary (outer) layer of the electrical double-layer. The effect of the outer layer on electrode reactions has been neglected in most surface electrochemical studies but in certain situations, such as in conducting polymers and... 

L/evelopment of sophisticated surface analytical techniques over the past two decades has revived interest in the study of phenomena that occur at the electrode-solution interface. As a consequence of this renewed activity, electrochemical surface science is experiencing a rapid growth in empirical information. The symposium on which this book was based brought together established and up-and-coming researchers from the three interrelated disciplines of electrochemistry, surface science, and metal-cluster chemistry to help provide a better focus on the current status and future directions of research in electrochemistry. The symposium was part of the continuing series on Photochemical and Electrochemical Surface Science sponsored by the Division of Colloid and Surface Chemistry of the American Chemical Society. 

Valuable information can be obtained from thermal desorption spectra (TDS) spectra, despite the fact that electrochemists are somewhat cautious about the relevance of ultrahigh vacuum data to the solution situation, and the solid/liquid interface in particular. Their objections arise from the fact that properties of the double layer depend on the interaction of the electrode with ions in the solution. Experiments in which the electrode, after having been in contact with the solution, is evacuated and further investigated under high vacuum conditions, can hardly reflect the real situation at the metal/solution interface. However, the TDS spectra can provide valuable information about the energy of water adsorption on metals and its dependence on the surface structure. At low temperatures of 100 to 200 K, frozen molecules of water are fixed at the metal. This case is quite different from the adsorption at the electrode/solution interface, which usually involves a dynamic equilibrium with molecules in the bulk. 

Dynamic electrochemistry is seen to alter the ratio of a(0) to a(R) for the redox couple at the surface of the working electrode (i.e. at the electrode solution interface). Note that this alteration occurs during electrolysis, such that the electrode potential Eq,r can shift according to the Nernst equation. 

The essential difference between the biosensors described in Section 3.2.1.1 and those dealt with in this Section is that, while the former must have a minimal flow-cell void volume in order to provide adequate sensitivity because measurements are made on the solution held in the cell, electro-analytical sensors rely on measurements during the process that takes place at the electrode/solution interface — the solution must be in contact with the sensing surface, so the cell volume is not a limiting factor. 

The slowest step, or rate-determining step, can be either (a) electron transfer at the electrode-solution interface or (b) formation of atoms at the electrode surface. The activation polarization component of the overpotential, r)a, is related to the actual rate of oxidation or reduction, i, and the exchange current density ... 

Calculate the capacity of the electrode/solution interface system and the active surface of the electrode, given the specific capacity factor 20 pF/cm2. (Mussini)... 

---