Atoms dimensions

Lehmann M, Lichte H, Geiger D, Lang G and Schweda E 1999 Eiectron hoiography at atomic dimensions—present state Mater. Character. 42 249-63... 

The abihty to enlarge tiny objects to macroscopic dimensions immediately suggests the need to make measurements and other observations helptiil in documenting what is seen and thus enabling others to confirm that a specimen has been identified with certainty. Many physical and chemical properties of a microscopic substance can be measured, even on particles nearing atomic dimensions. 

In 1903, Rutherford and associates were finally able to deflect the a-rays by electric and magnetic fields, showing that these are positively charged. Measurement of the charge-to-mass ratio indicated that a-rays were of atomic dimensions. In 1908 definitive experiments showed a-rays to be doubly chaiged helium atoms, ie, helium nuclei. 

On the electrode side of the double layer the excess charges are concentrated in the plane of the surface of the electronic conductor. On the electrolyte side of the double layer the charge distribution is quite complex. The potential drop occurs over several atomic dimensions and depends on the specific reactivity and atomic stmcture of the electrode surface and the electrolyte composition. The electrical double layer strongly influences the rate and pathway of electrode reactions. The reader is referred to several excellent discussions of the electrical double layer at the electrode—solution interface (26-28). 

A colloid is a material that exists ia a finely dispersed state. It is usually a solid particle, but it may be a Hquid droplet or a gas bubble. Typically, coUoids have high surface-area-to-volume ratios, characteristic of matter ia the submicrometer-size range. Matter of this size, from approximately 100 nm to 5 nm, just above atomic dimensions, exhibits physicochemical properties that differ from those of both the constituent atoms or molecules and the macroscopic material. The differences ia composition, stmcture, and iateractions between the surface atoms or molecules and those on the iaterior of the colloidal particle lead to the unique character of finely divided material, specifics of which can be quite diverse (see Flocculating agents). 

To address these challenges, chemical engineers will need state-of-the-art analytical instruments, particularly those that can provide information about microstmctures for sizes down to atomic dimensions, surface properties in the presence of bulk fluids, and dynamic processes with time constants of less than a nanosecond. It will also be essential that chemical engineers become familiar with modem theoretical concepts of surface physics and chemistry, colloid physical chemistry, and rheology, particrrlarly as it apphes to free surface flow and flow near solid bormdaries. The application of theoretical concepts to rmderstanding the factors controlling surface properties and the evaluation of complex process models will require access to supercomputers. 

The volume of an atom is determined by the size of its electron cloud. Example demonstrates that atomic dimensions are a little over 10 m, whereas Rutherford s experiments showed that nuclear dimensions are only about 10 m. This is 100,000 times smaller than atomic dimensions, so the nucleus is buried deep within the electron cloud. If an atom were the size of a sports stadium, its nucleus would be the size of a pea. Figure 7 1 shows a schematic view of two atoms with their electron clouds in contact with each other. 

Since early in this century the concept of the active site in catalysis [1] has been a focus of attention in this area of chemistry. This was proposed to be that ensemble of surface atoms/reactants which is responsible for the crucial surface reaction step involved in a catalytic conversion. Since those days much work has been done in the area, which cites the concept of the active site. However, no such ensemble has been positively identified due to the lack of availability of techniques which could image such a structure, which is of atomic dimensions. 

There have been, and still are, attempts to isolates this gold, however, the costs are too high. The following example illustrates how difficult it is for us to imagine atomic dimensions. 

Electrons with the same spin behave as if there is a repulsive force acting between them. This apparent force is sometimes called the Pauli force. However, it is preferable not to speak of Pauli forces, since they are only apparent forces, not real forces like electromagnetic or gravitational forces. In fact, the Pauli principle implies that there is an intimate interconnection between the constituent parts of matter in the universe. Strictly speaking, no part can be isolated from the rest, except in an idealized way. The Pauli force acts at any time and over huge distances, much larger than atomic dimensions, but its effect becomes dramatic only when electrons of the same spin happen to be close to each other. 

In principle, structure analysis can be considered as distribution analysis in atomic dimensions. However, from the practical point of view it makes sense to deal separately with structure analysis and to differentiate between molecular structure analysis and crystal structure analysis. Further structure investigations concern near-orders in solids and liquids (e.g. glass). 

This strengthens the case for treating structure analysis as a particular field of analytical chemistry despite the fact that, from the philosophical point of view, structure analysis can be considered as distribution analysis (topochemical analysis) of species in atomic dimensions. Structure analysis of solids follows a similar scheme like that given above. The characteristics of molecules are then linked with those of crystals and elementary cells. 

Distribution analysis in atomic dimensions becomes structure analysis. But because of its specific methodology, it makes sense to consider structure analysis as a separate field of analytical chemistry see Sect. 1.2. Therefore, the information-theoretical fundamentals of structure analysis are different from that of element analysis and have been represented by Danzer and Marx [ 1979a,b]. 

Elastic strain results from a concerted process (at scales greater than atomic dimensions), whereas plastic deformation results from a disconcerted one. 

Dislocation motion in covalent crystals is thermally activated at temperatures above the Einstein (Debye) temperature. The activation energies are well-defined, and the velocities are approximately proportional to the applied stresses (Sumino, 1989). These facts indicate that the rate determining process is localized to atomic dimensions. Dislocation lines do not move concertedly. Instead, sharp kinks form along their lengths, and as these kinks move so do the lines. The kinks are localized at individual chemical bonds that cross the glide plane (Figure 5.8). 

Darwin, 1929 Mott, 1930). The incident particle has momentum HKg before any interaction its momentum after exciting atoms 1 and 2 respectively into the nth and mth states is represented by hKnm. Mott showed that the entire process has negligible cross section unless the angular divergences are comparable to or less than (K a)-1, where a denotes the atomic size. As Darwin (1929) correctly conjectured, the wavefunction of the system before any interaction is the uncoupled product of the wavefunctions of the atom and of the incident particle. After the first interaction, these wavefunctions get inextricably mixed and each subsequent interaction makes it worse. Also, according to the Ehrenfest principle, the wavefunction of the incident particle is localized to atomic dimensions after the first interaction therefore, the subsequent process is adequately described in the particle picture. 

Cu(100) top is shown [77], It implies that for both substrates, Au(100) and Ag(100), an (for atomic dimensions) incredibly large number of Cu layers has to be deposited, before the overlayer acquires bulk structure. This behavior is vastly different from that on Au(lll) and Ag(lll), where pseudomorphic growth is restricted to one and two layers, respectively. 

A second application of current interest in which widely separated length scales come into play is fabrication of modulated foils or wires with layer thickness of a few nanometers or less [156]. In this application, the aspect ratio of layer thickness, which may be of nearly atomic dimensions, to workpiece size, is enormous, and the current distribution must be uniform on the entire range of scales between the two. Optimal conditions for these structures require control by local mechanisms to suppress instability and produce layer by layer growth. Epitaxially deposited single crystals with modulated composition on these scales can be described as superlattices. Moffat, in a report on Cu-Ni superlattices, briefly reviews the constraints operating on their fabrication by electrodeposition [157]. 

As was discussed in Chapter 6, the electronic polarizability, a, of species is very useful for correlating many chemical and physical properties. Values of a are usually expressed in cm3 per unit (atom, ion, or molecule). Because atomic dimensions are conveniently expressed in angstroms, the polarizability is also expressed as A3, so lCT24cm3 = 1 A3. The polarizability gives a measure of the ability of the electron cloud of a species to be distorted so it is also related to the hard-soft character of the species in a qualitative way. Table 9.6 gives the polarizabilities for ions and molecules. 

The other utility of Eq. (16) is as an aid to thinking about the temperature dependence of the capture rate. If Rc is large, and in most situations when Rc is of the order of an interatomic spacing, its temperature dependence will be modest, usually much more gradual than that of the diffusion coefficient. However, in cases where Rc is much smaller than atomic dimensions, there is likely to be an activation barrier against association, and if this is sizable, Rc will vary rapidly with temperature. 

A quite different aspect of local kinetics is that having to do with changes of charge state, e.g., between H+ and H° or H° and H. Such changes require emission or absorption of electrons or holes. Since the mean free paths of these carriers are large compared with atomic dimensions, it is customary (see for example Lax, 1960) to use a velocity-averaged cross section a as the key descriptor of the rate of a capture reaction such as H+ + e— H°. Explicitly, we write, for this case,... 

A simple but risky assumption would be that r2 1 is given by an equation analogous to (20) with a capture radius Rc of the order of atomic dimensions. Then, t2 > 2hr at 250°C would imply a binding energy AE2 for the reaction (132)... 

Field emission microscopy was the first technique capable of imaging surfaces at resolution close to atomic dimensions. The pioneer in this area was E.W. Muller, who published the field emission microscope in 1936 and later the field ion microscope in 1951 [23]. Both techniques are limited to sharp tips of high melting metals (tungsten, rhenium, rhodium, iridium, and platinum), but have been extremely useful in exploring and understanding the properties of metal surfaces. We mention the structure of clean metal surfaces, defects, order/disorder phenomena,... 

The work function plays an important role in catalysis. It determines how easily an electron may leave the metal to do something useful for the activation of reacting molecules. However, strictly speaking, the work function is a macroscopic property, whereas chemisorption and catalysis are locally determined phenomena. They need to be described in terms of short-range interactions between adsorbed molecules and one or more atoms at the surface. The point we want to make is that, particularly for heterogeneous surfaces, the concept of a macroscopic work function, which is the average over the entire surface, is not very useful. It is more meaningful to define the work function as a local quantity on a scale with atomic dimensions. 

---