Electrochemical surface

SAMs are generating attention for numerous potential uses ranging from chromatography [SO] to substrates for liquid crystal alignment [SI]. Most attention has been focused on future application as nonlinear optical devices [49] however, their use to control electron transfer at electrochemical surfaces has already been realized [S2], In addition, they provide ideal model surfaces for studies of protein adsorption [S3]. 

Strehblow HH, Bettini M (1980) Electrochemical surface reactions on PbTe. J Electrochem Soc127 847-855... 

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the activation of carbon surfaces. These have Included the removal of surface contaminants that hinder electron transfer, an Increase In surface area due to ralcro-roughenlng or bulld-up of a thin porous layer, and an Increase In the concentrations of surface functional groups that mediate electron transfer. Electrode deactivation has been correlated with an unintentional Introduction of surface contaminants (15). Improved electrode responses have been observed to follow treatments which Increase the concentration of carbon-oxygen functional groups on the surface (7-8,16). In some cases, the latter were correlated with the presence of electrochemical surface waves (16-17). However, none of the above reports discuss other possible mechanisms of activation which could be responsible for the effects observed. 

In their electrochemical surface properties, a number of metals (lead, tin, cadmium, and others) resemble mercury, whereas other metals of the platinum group resemble platinum itself. Within each of these groups, trends in the behavior observed coincide qualitatively, sometimes even semiquantitatively. Some of the differences between mercury and other. y- or p-metals are due to their solid state. Among the platinum group metals, palladium is exceptional, since strong bulk absorption of hydrogen is observed here in addition to surface adsorption, an effect that makes it difficult to study the surface itself. 

Different electrochemical surface treatments have found extensive use for the purposes of providing metal parts with particular properties, appearance, and shape. This includes the apphcation of superficial oxide or salt films (see Section 16.3), metal films (Section 16.5), and a number of methods that exploit the selective anodic dissolution of different segments of the metal surface. We examine briefly a few examples of the latter type. 

One of the critical issues with regard to low temperamre fuel cells is the gradual loss of performance due to the degradation of the cathode catalyst layer under the harsh operating conditions, which mainly consist of two aspects electrochemical surface area (ECA) loss of the carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles and corrosion of the carbon support itself. Extensive studies of cathode catalyst layer degradation in phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAECs) have shown that ECA loss is mainly caused by three mechanisms ... 

If only nonprecious atoms (e.g., Co or Fe) were selectively dissolved from the alloy surface, the roughness of the resulting Pt surface layer would be increased with the number of sweeps. However, as seen in Fig. 10.2a, the value of AQ (a measure of the electrochemical surface area) rather decreases gradually and reaches a steady value. 

A. Zolfaghari and G. Jerkiewicz, in Electrochemical Surface Science of Hydrogen Adsorption and Absorption (eds. G. Jerkiewicz, P. Marcus),... 

Iron and Stainless Steel. The purpose of XPS investigations on typical corrosion systems like iron or stainless steel, is the determination of the composition of the passive surface layer, if possible, as a function of depth. As a consequence of the technical and economic relevance of corrosion reactions, XPS investigations on corrosion systems are numerous. With respect to the application of XPS, there is no difference between corrosion systems and any other electrochemical surface reaction like oxide formation on noble metals. Therefore, in this paragraph only a few recent typical results of such studies, using XPS, will be mentioned. For a detailed collection of XPS corrosion studies the reader is referred to references [43,104], A review of aqueous corrosion studies, using XPS, was given by McIntyre for the elements O, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Mo [105], The book edited by M. Froment [111] gives an impression of the research achieved on passivity of metals up to 1983. 

In view of the complexity of heterogeneous systems, none of the above techniques will be able to supply, by itself, a complete atomic-level description of surface phenomena. A multi-technique approach has been perceived by many as most appropriate for fundamental studies in electrochemical surface science (30-2). Since none of the existing electrochemical laboratories are adequately equipped to perform a comprehensive experimental study, collaborative efforts between research groups of different expertise are burgeoning. Easier access to national or central facilities are also being contemplated for experiments which cannot be performed elsewhere. The judicious combination of the available methods in conjunction with the appropriate electrochemical measurements are permitting studies of electrocatalyst surface phenomena unparalleled in molecular detail. 

With the experimental and theoretical strategies available today, research in electrochemical surface science has been revived. There is great optimism that much of the mysteries surrounding electrocatalysis will soon be unravelled in molecular detail hitherto unachievable. 

---