Distance dependence surfaces

Although the DMT theory attempts to incorporate distance-dependent surface interactions into the adhesion problem, it does not take into account the effect surface forces have on the elastic deformation. In other words, it does not predict the neck formation predicted by JKR. 

Fignre 16. Distance dependent surface-hopping rates from A, A, and X states, obtained by summing CREAM hopping rates to all other states. 

Use Equation VIII-1 to determine the effective mass of the cantilever if the cantilever has a spring constant C = 20 N/m, the minimum detectable force gradient is hF/dz = 4 X 10 N/m, and the frequency shift is 200 kHz. How does the frequency shift depend on distance from the surface if the force has a 1/z distance dependence ... 

By using an effective, distance-dependent dielectric constant, the ability of bulk water to reduce electrostatic interactions can be mimicked without the presence of explicit solvent molecules. One disadvantage of aU vacuum simulations, corrected for shielding effects or not, is the fact that they cannot account for the ability of water molecules to form hydrogen bonds with charged and polar surface residues of a protein. As a result, adjacent polar side chains interact with each other and not with the solvent, thus introducing additional errors. 

Further improvements can be achieved by replacing the oxygen with a non-physiological (synthetic) electron acceptor, which is able to shuttle electrons from the flavin redox center of the enzyme to the surface of the working electrode. Glucose oxidase (and other oxidoreductase enzymes) do not directly transfer electrons to conventional electrodes because their redox center is surroimded by a thick protein layer. This insulating shell introduces a spatial separation of the electron donor-acceptor pair, and hence an intrinsic barrier to direct electron transfer, in accordance with the distance dependence of the electron transfer rate (11) ... 

Stelzer et al. [109] have studied the case of a nematic phase in the vicinity of a smooth solid wall. A distance-dependent potential was applied to favour alignment along the surface normal near the interface that is, a homeotropic anchoring force was applied. The liquid crystal was modelled with the GB(3.0, 5.0, 2, 1) potential and the simulations were run at temperatures and densities corresponding to the nematic phase. Away from the walls the molecules behave just as in the bulk. However, as the wall is approached, oscillations appear in the density profile indicating that a layered structure is induced by the interface, as we can see from the snapshot in Fig. 19. These layers are... 

The studies on adhesion are mostly concerned on predictions and measurements of adhesion forces, but this section is written from a different standpoint. The author intends to present a dynamic analysis of adhesion which has been recently published [7], with the emphasis on the mechanism of energy dissipation. When two solids are brought into contact, or inversely separated apart by applied forces, the process will never go smoothly enough—the surfaces will always jump into and out of contact, no matter how slowly the forces are applied. We will show later that this is originated from the inherent mechanical instability of the system in which two solid bodies of certain stiffness interact through a distance dependent on potential energy. 

FIG. 8 Force-distance dependence for surfaces covered with fluorocarbon amphiphile 1 in pure water (1) and in aqueous solutions containing 0.7 mg/L poly (styrenesulfonate) (2) and 7.0 g/L poly (styrenesulfonate) (3). The molecular weight of the polymer is 5 X ICP. Lines are drawn as a visual guide. 

In filtration, the particle-collector interaction is taken as the sum of the London-van der Waals and double layer interactions, i.e. the Deijagin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory. In most cases, the London-van der Waals force is attractive. The double layer interaction, on the other hand, may be repulsive or attractive depending on whether the surface of the particle and the collector bear like or opposite charges. The range and distance dependence is also different. The DLVO theory was later extended with contributions from the Born repulsion, hydration (structural) forces, hydrophobic interactions and steric hindrance originating from adsorbed macromolecules or polymers. Because no analytical solutions exist for the full convective diffusion equation, a number of approximations were devised (e.g., Smoluchowski-Levich approximation, and the surface force boundary layer approximation) to solve the equations in an approximate way, using analytical methods. 

Figure 9.11 Promoter-induced binding energy shifts of Ar, Kr and Xe photoemission peaks with respect to adsorption on the clean metal as a function of the distance of the adsorption site to the nearest potassium atom on a potassium-promoted Rh( 111) surface. These curves reflect the variation of the surface potential (or local work function) around an adsorbed potassium atom. Note the strong and distance-dependent local work function at short distances and the constant local work function, which is lower than that of clean Rh( 111) at larger distances from potassium. The lowering at larger distances depends on the potassium coverage. The averaged distances between the potassium atoms are 1.61, 1.32 and 1.20 nm for coverages of 2.7, 4.1 and 5.0% respectively, vertical lines mark the half-way distances. Lines are drawn as a guide to the eye (adapted from Janssens et al. [38]).

Using this apparatus, Binnig et al. demonstrated the exponential distance dependence of tunneling current over four orders of magnitude. Their first results are summarized in Fig. 1.6. The value of the work function was found to depend sharply on the condition of the surfaces. Initially, the measured values were around 0.6 - 0.7 eV. After repeated cleaning, the slope became much steeper. A value of 3.2 eV was obtained, which can last for several minutes. Being still lower than the value for clean surfaces, 4 — 5 eV, it was... 

At extremely short distances, for example, zo < 3 A, the repulsive force becomes dominant. It has a very steep distance dependence. The tip-sample distance is virtually determined by the short-ranged repulsive force. By pushing the tip farther toward the sample surface, the tip and sample deform accordingly. 

Fig. 2.2. The image potential of an electron near a metal surface. The electron induces positive charge at the metal surface, (a) The effect of the positive surface charge is equivalent to a fictitious image charge behind the metal surface, (b) fhe distance dependence of the image potential.

Similar to the failures of the free-electron model of metals (Ashcroft and Mermin, 1985, Chapter 3), the fundamental deficiency of the jellium model consists in its total neglect of the atomic structure of the solids. Furthermore, because the jellium model does not have band structure, it does not support the concept of surface states. Regarding STM, the jellium model predicts the correct surface potential (the image force), and is useful for interpreting the distance dependence of tunneling current. However, it is inapplicable for describing STM images with atomic resolution. 

Schuster, R., Barth, J. V., Wintterlin, J., Bohm, R. J., and Ertl, G. (1992). Distance dependence and cormgation in barrier-height measurements on metal surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 42-44, 533-540. 

Van Duyne RP, Haes AJ, Zou S, Schatz GC (2004) A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor The Long Range Distance Dependence of the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance of Noble Metal Nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 108 109-116... 

Here Vij denotes the distance between atoms i and j and g(i) the type of the amino acid i. The Leonard-Jones parameters Vij,Rij for potential depths and equilibrium distance) depend on the type of the atom pair and were adjusted to satisfy constraints derived from as a set of 138 proteins of the PDB database [18, 17, 19]. The non-trivial electrostatic interactions in proteins are represented via group-specific dielectric constants ig(i),g(j) depending on the amino-acid to which atom i belongs). The partial charges qi and the dielectric constants were derived in a potential-of-mean-force approach [20]. Interactions with the solvent were first fit in a minimal solvent accessible surface model [21] parameterized by free energies per unit area (7j to reproduce the enthalpies of solvation of the Gly-X-Gly family of peptides [22]. Ai corresponds to the area of atom i that is in contact with a ficticious solvent. Hydrogen bonds are described via dipole-dipole interactions included in the electrostatic terms... 

---