Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface forces hydrophobic

Protein adsorption has been studied with a variety of techniques such as ellipsome-try [107,108], ESCA [109], surface forces measurements [102], total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRE) [103,110], electron microscopy [111], and electrokinetic measurement of latex particles [112,113] and capillaries [114], The TIRE technique has recently been adapted to observe surface diffusion [106] and orientation [IIS] in adsorbed layers. These experiments point toward the significant influence of the protein-surface interaction on the adsorption characteristics [105,108,110]. A very important interaction is due to the hydrophobic interaction between parts of the protein and polymeric surfaces [18], although often electrostatic interactions are also influential [ 116]. Protein desorption can be affected by altering the pH [117] or by the introduction of a complexing agent [118]. [Pg.404]

Particle-Bubble Attachment. In the above, principles leading to creation of desired hydrophobicity/hydrophihcity of the particles has been discussed. The next step is to create conditions for particle-bubble contact, attachment, and their removal, which is simply described as a combination of three stochastic events with which are associated the probability of particle-bubble colhsion, probabihty of attachment, and probability of retention of attachment. The first term is controlled by the hydrodynamic conditions prevaihng in the flotation unit. The second is determined by the surface forces. The third is dependent on the s irvival of the laden bubble by liq ud t irbulence and impacts by the other suspended particles. A detailed description of the hydrodynamic and other physical aspects of flotation is found in the monograph by Schulze (19 ). [Pg.1810]

The surface forces apparatus (SEA) can measure the interaction forces between two surfaces through a liquid [10,11]. The SEA consists of two curved, molecularly smooth mica surfaces made from sheets with a thickness of a few micrometers. These sheets are glued to quartz cylindrical lenses ( 10-mm radius of curvature) and mounted with then-axes perpendicular to each other. The distance is measured by a Fabry-Perot optical technique using multiple beam interference fringes. The distance resolution is 1-2 A and the force sensitivity is about 10 nN. With the SEA many fundamental interactions between surfaces in aqueous solutions and nonaqueous liquids have been identified and quantified. These include the van der Waals and electrostatic double-layer forces, oscillatory forces, repulsive hydration forces, attractive hydrophobic forces, steric interactions involving polymeric systems, and capillary and adhesion forces. Although cleaved mica is the most commonly used substrate material in the SEA, it can also be coated with thin films of materials with different chemical and physical properties [12]. [Pg.246]

In filtration, the particle-collector interaction is taken as the sum of the London-van der Waals and double layer interactions, i.e. the Deijagin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory. In most cases, the London-van der Waals force is attractive. The double layer interaction, on the other hand, may be repulsive or attractive depending on whether the surface of the particle and the collector bear like or opposite charges. The range and distance dependence is also different. The DLVO theory was later extended with contributions from the Born repulsion, hydration (structural) forces, hydrophobic interactions and steric hindrance originating from adsorbed macromolecules or polymers. Because no analytical solutions exist for the full convective diffusion equation, a number of approximations were devised (e.g., Smoluchowski-Levich approximation, and the surface force boundary layer approximation) to solve the equations in an approximate way, using analytical methods. [Pg.209]

Experimental studies of the thermodynamic, spectroscopic and transport properties of mineral/water interfaces have been extensive, albeit conflicting at times (4-10). Ambiguous terms such as "hydration forces", "hydrophobic interactions", and "structured water" have arisen to describe interfacial properties which have been difficult to quantify and explain. A detailed statistical-mechanical description of the forces, energies and properties of water at mineral surfaces is clearly desirable. [Pg.21]

What is the likely future use of MC and MD techniques for studying interfacial systems Several promising approaches are possible. Continued investigation of double layer properties, "hydration forces", "hydrophobic effects", and "structured water" are clearly awaiting the development of improved models for water-water, solute-water, surface-water, and surface-solute potentials. [Pg.33]

Between hydrophobic surfaces a completely different interaction is observed. Hydrophobic surfaces attract each other [184], This attraction is called hydrophobic interaction. The first direct evidence that the interaction between solid hydrophobic surfaces is stronger than the van der Waals attraction was provided by Pashley and Israelachvili [185,186], With the surface force apparatus they observed an exponentially decaying attractive force between two mica surfaces with an adsorbed monolayer of the cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Since then the hydrophobic force has been investigated by different groups and its existence is now generally accepted [189]. The origin of the hydrophobic force is, however, still under debate. [Pg.107]

Surfactants adsorb on solid surfaces due to hydrophobic bonding, electrostatic interaction, acid-base interaction, polarisation of rr electrons and dispersion forces. Hydrophobic bonding occurs between the hydrophobic surfactant tail and the hydrophobic solid surface (tail down adsorption with monolayer structure) or between the hydrophobic tails of the surfactant adsorbed on the hydrophilic solid surface and the hydrophobic tails of the surfactant from the liquid phase (head down adsorption with bilayer structure) [54, 55]. [Pg.39]

Later an exceptionally long-range attractive force between mica surfaces made hydrophobic by LB deposition of a monolayer of dimethyldioctadecyl-ammonium bromide (DODAB) was measured by Christenson and Claesson [82], It was shown to be an exponentially decaying force with a decay-length of 12-13 nm in the distance range 20-80 nm. This force was noted to be up to 100 times stronger than the expected van der Waals attraction (Fig. 5). [Pg.32]

The interferometric SFA has served as an invaluable tool in studying the hydrophobic attraction among other things due to the fact that it is the only technique available today that enables direct observation of occurrence of cavitation. For instance, recently Lin et al. [89] employed a dynamic surface forces measurement method to study interactions between DODAB LB coated surfaces. High-speed camera images of FECO revealed that there are no bubbles on the surfaces prior to contact. However, short-lived cavities, typically lasting 3 ps before disappearing, have been observed to form upon separation (Fig. 6). [Pg.33]

Force-distance curves between monolayers of monoglycerides, monoolein and monopalmitin, deposited on hydrophobically modified mica were determined using the surface force technique. It was demonstrated that the interactions between the monoglyceride films change with the state of the hydrocarbon chain, the headgroup being the same. In transition from the more condensed state to the more fluid state the attraction between the monolayers decreased whereas the repulsion increased [100]. [Pg.36]

Another AFM-based technique is chemical force microscopy (CFM) (Friedsam et al. 2004 Noy et al. 2003 Ortiz and Hadziioaimou 1999), where the AFM tip is functionalized with specific chemicals of interest, such as proteins or other food biopolymers, and can be used to probe the intermolecular interactions between food components. CFM combines chemical discrimination with the high spatial resolution of AFM by exploiting the forces between chemically derivatized AFM tips and the surface. The key interactions involved in food components include fundamental interactions such as van der Waals force, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic force, and elastic force arising from conformation entropy, and so on. (Dther interactions such as chemical bonding, depletion potential, capillary force, hydration force, hydrophobic/ hydrophobic force and osmotic pressure will also participate to affect the physical properties and phase behaviors of multicomponent food systems. Direct measurements of these inter- and intramolecular forces are of great interest because such forces dominate the behavior of different food systems. [Pg.131]

Two types of Aerosil with different surface activity have been studied hydrophilic and hydrophobic Aerosil. Hydrophilic Aerosil contains on its siirface hydroxyl groups which are the sites of adsorption. The surface groups of hydrophilic Aerosil are able to interact with the PDMS chain both through permanent dipoles in the partially ionic siloxane bond via permanent dipole-dipole interactions and through even weaker van der Waals forces. In contrast to hydrophilic Aerosil, non-polar trimethylsilyl groups on the surface of hydrophobic Aerosil effectively decrease the dipole-dipole interaction and mainly weak van der Waals forces are formed between methyl groups of PDMS and trimethylsilyl surface groups of Aerosil. [Pg.799]

As opposed to normal-phase HPLC, reversed-phase chromatography employs mainly dispersive forces (hydrophobic or van der Waals interactions). The polarities of mobile and stationary phases are reversed, such that the surface of the stationary phase in RP HPLC is hydrophobic and mobile phase is polar, where mainly water-based solutions are employed. [Pg.11]

The work described here strengthens the idea that when the a-helix is present in a polypeptide monolayer, the transition in the pressure—area curve arises from the collapse of the monolayer under the action of surface forces and that at least in some cases this is in the nature of a phase transition and proceeds in an orderly manner. The transition is in fact rather analogous to the development of the tertiary structure in a protein under the action of hydrophobic forces. We can therefore now... [Pg.357]


See other pages where Surface forces hydrophobic is mentioned: [Pg.247]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.795]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.2991]    [Pg.4157]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.104]   


SEARCH



Hydrophobic force

Hydrophobic surfaces

Surface Hydrophobation

Surface force hydrophobic interaction

Surface forces

Surface hydrophobicity

© 2024 chempedia.info