Kinetic steady state

C. N. Montreiul, S. D. WiUiams, and A. A. Adanc2yk, Modeling Current Generation Catalytic Converters Eaboratoy Experiments and Kinetic Parameter Optimisation—Steady State Kinetics, SAE 920096, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 1992. 

Kinetic studies involving enzymes can principally be classified into steady and transient state kinetics. In tlie former, tlie enzyme concentration is much lower tlian that of tlie substrate in tlie latter much higher enzyme concentration is used to allow detection of reaction intennediates. In steady state kinetics, the high efficiency of enzymes as a catalyst implies that very low concentrations are adequate to enable reactions to proceed at measurable rates (i.e., reaction times of a few seconds or more). Typical enzyme concentrations are in the range of 10 M to 10 ], while substrate concentrations usually exceed lO M. Consequently, tlie concentrations of enzyme-substrate intermediates are low witli respect to tlie total substrate (reactant) concentrations, even when tlie enzyme is fully saturated. The reaction is considered to be in a steady state after a very short induction period, which greatly simplifies the rate laws. 

Photoinitiation is an excellent method for studying the pre- and posteffects of free radical polymerization, and from the ratio of the specific rate constant (kx) in non-steady-state conditions, together with steady-state kinetics, the absolute values of propagation (kp) and termination (k,) rate constants for radical polymerization can be obtained. 

In the case of reagents with a low content of inhibitors a steady-state polymerization rate may be set up. Steady-state kinetics are also observed... 

Steady-state kinetics. Consider the interchange of 02 and CO coordinated to myoglobin, an iron porphyrin represented as PFe ... 

Steady-state kinetics. The nickel complex Ni2(C5H5)2(CO)2 reacts with diphenylacety-Iene (dpa) to add dpa and displace both CO molecules. Assume the following mechanism ... 

Steady-state kinetics. The reaction of methylthiamine (MT+) in the presence of a large excess of SO3 and of 4-thiopyridone (= ArS-) is believed to follow the mechanism shown here,15 in which A" and B are steady-state intermediates. Derive the steady-state rate law. 

Steady-state kinetics. The cycloaddition reaction between the singlet ground state of 2-isopropylidene cyclopentane-1,3-diyl ( = S ) with acrylonitrile (A) is believed to occur by way of a biradical intermediate (BR),17... 

The reader can show that, with the steady-state approximation for [Tl2+], this scheme agrees with Eq. (6-14), with the constants k = k i and k = k j/k g. Of course, as is usual with steady-state kinetics, only the ratio of the rate constants for the intermediate can be determined. Subsequent to this work, however, Tl2+ has been generated by pulse radiolysis (Chapter 11), and direct determinations of k- and k g have been made.5... 

Figure 8.78. Steady-state kinetics of C2H4 oxidation on Pt/Ce02 as a function of catalyst potential, UWR, and oxygen partial pressure. T=500°C, Pc2h4=1-5 kPa.71 Reprinted by permission of The Electrochemical Society.

Despite these problems, the potential of research with conformationally restricted substrate analogs appears to be great. As yet, the use of these analogs with tools other than steady-state kinetics has been little explored. 

Fig. 9. The MoFe protein cycle of molybdenum nitrogenase. This cycle depicts a plausible sequence of events in the reduction of N2 to 2NH3 + H2. The scheme is based on well-characterized model chemistry (15, 105) and on the pre-steady-state kinetics of product formation by nitrogenase (102). The enzymic process has not been chsiracter-ized beyond M5 because the chemicals used to quench the reactions hydrolyze metal nitrides. As in Fig. 8, M represents an aji half of the MoFe protein. Subscripts 0-7 indicate the number of electrons trsmsferred to M from the Fe protein via the cycle of Fig. 8.

The mechanism of the first half-reaction has been studied by a combination of reductive titrations with CO and sodium dithionite and pre-steady-state kinetic studies by rapid freeze quench EPR spectroscopy (FQ-EPR) and stopped-flow kinetics 159). These combined studies have led to the following mechanism. The resting enzyme is assumed to have a metal-bound hydroxide nucleophile. Evidence for this species is based on the similarities between the pH dependence of the EPR spectrum of Cluster C and the for the for CO, deter-... 

We have studied the steady-state kinetics and selectivity of this reaction on clean, well-characterized sinxle-crystal surfaces of silver by usinx a special apparatus which allows rapid ( 20 s) transfer between a hixh-pressure catalytic microreactor and an ultra-hixh vacuum surface analysis (AES, XPS, LEED, TDS) chamber. The results of some of our recent studies of this reaction will be reviewed. These sinxle-crystal studies have provided considerable new insixht into the reaction pathway throuxh molecularly adsorbed O2 and C2H4, the structural sensitivity of real silver catalysts, and the role of chlorine adatoms in pro-motinx catalyst selectivity via an ensemble effect. 

Fig. 8. A model of bases on steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic data. Ps indicate the two phosphorylation sites. Cl, CII and NIII refer to domains A, B, and C, respectively.

In conclusion, the steady-state kinetics of mannitol phosphorylation catalyzed by II can be explained within the model shown in Fig. 8 which was based upon different types of experiments. Does this mean that the mechanisms of the R. sphaeroides II " and the E. coli II are different Probably not. First of all, kinetically the two models are only different in that the 11 " model is an extreme case of the II model. The reorientation of the binding site upon phosphorylation of the enzyme is infinitely fast and complete in the former model, whereas competition between the rate of reorientation of the site and the rate of substrate binding to the site gives rise to the two pathways in the latter model. The experimental set-up may not have been adequate to detect the second pathway in case of II " . The important differences between the two models are at the level of the molecular mechanisms. In the II " model, the orientation of the binding site is directly linked to the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme, whereas in the II" model, the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme modulates the activation energy of the isomerization of the binding site between the two sides of the membrane. Steady-state kinetics by itself can never exclusively discriminate between these different models at the molecular level since a condition may be proposed where these different models show similar kinetics. The II model is based upon many different types of data discussed in this chapter and the steady-state kinetics is shown to be merely consistent with the model. Therefore, the II model is more likely to be representative for the mechanisms of E-IIs. 

The Kmax (and K, see below) constants determined from steady-state kinetic measurements are thus seen to be complex constants containing two or more of the individual rate constants illustrated in Fig. 2. 

Steady state and non steady state kinetic measurements suggest that methane carbon dioxide reforming proceeds in sequential steps combining dissociation and surface reaction of methane and CO2 During admission of pulses of methane on the supported Pt catalysts and on the oxide supports, methane decomposes into hydrogen and surface carbon The amount of CH, converted per pulse decreases drastically after the third pulse (this corresponds to about 2-3 molecules of CH< converted per Pt atom) indicating that the reaction stops when Pt is covered with (reactive) carbon CO2 is also concluded to dissociate under reaction conditions generating CO and adsorbed... 

Ogura, Y. and Yamazaki, I. (1983). Steady-state kinetics of the catalase reaction in the presence of cyanide. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 94, 403-408. 

The calculated conversions presented in Table VIII used Eq. (57). They are quite remarkable. They reproduce experimental trends of lower conversion and higher peak bed temperature as the S02 content in the feed increases. Bunimovich et al. (1995) compared simulated and experimental conversion and peak bed temperature data for full-scale commercial plants and large-scale pilot plants using the model given in Table IX and the steady-state kinetic model [Eq. (57)]. Although the time-average plant performance was predicted closely, limiting cycle period predicted by the... 

Model dynamics were forced to steady state by setting derivatives for the melt complexes in Eq. (61) to zero (Bunimovich et al., 1995). This should make the model behave as though the steady-state kinetic model... 

Fig. 17. Comparison of the variation of the time-average S02 conversion and the maximum bed temperature predicted for stationary cycling condition by an unsteady-state and a steady-state kinetic model for a packed-bed S02 converter operating with periodic flow reversal...

Factors Affecting the Steady State Kinetic Constants... 

Figure 2.8 Relationship between steady state kinetic constants and specific portions of the enzyme reaction pathway.

For our purposes the most important factor that can impact the individual steady state kinetic constants is the presence of an inhibitor. We will see in Chapter 3 how specific modes of inhibitor interactions with target enzymes can be diagnosed by the effects that the inhibitors have on the three steady state kinetic constants. 

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the free enzyme (i.e., for which a = °°) is said to be competitive because the binding of the inhibitor and the substrate to the enzyme are mutually exclusive hence these inhibitors compete with the substrate for the pool of free enzyme molecules. Referring back to the relationships between the steady state kinetic constants and the steps in catalysis (Figure 2.8), one would expect inhibitors that conform to this mechanism to affect the apparent value of KM (which relates to formation of the enzyme-substrate complex) and VmJKM, but not the value of Vmax (which relates to the chemical steps subsequent to ES complex formation). The presence of a competitive inhibitor thus influences the steady state velocity equation as described by Equation (3.1) ... 

Table 3.3 Effects of inhibitors of different modalities on the apparent values of steady state kinetic constants and on specific steps in catalysis... 

In this chapter we described the thermodynamics of enzyme-inhibitor interactions and defined three potential modes of reversible binding of inhibitors to enzyme molecules. Competitive inhibitors bind to the free enzyme form in direct competition with substrate molecules. Noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and to the ES complex or subsequent enzyme forms that are populated during catalysis. Uncompetitive inhibitors bind exclusively to the ES complex or to subsequent enzyme forms. We saw that one can distinguish among these inhibition modes by their effects on the apparent values of the steady state kinetic parameters Umax, Km, and VmdX/KM. We further saw that for bisubstrate reactions, the inhibition modality depends on the reaction mechanism used by the enzyme. Finally, we described how one may use the dissociation constant for inhibition (Kh o.K or both) to best evaluate the relative affinity of different inhibitors for ones target enzyme, and thus drive compound optimization through medicinal chemistry efforts. 

---