Steady state experiments electron transfer kinetics

In this section, we will treat the one-step, one-electron reaction O + R using the general (quasireversible) i-E characteristic. In contrast with the reversible cases just examined, the interfacial electron-transfer kinetics in the systems considered here are not so fast as to be transparent. Thus kinetic parameters such as kf, and a influence the responses to potential steps and, as a consequence, can often be evaluated from those responses. The focus in this section is on ways to determine such kinetic information from step experiments, including sampled-current voltammetry. As in the treatment of reversible cases, the discussion will be developed first for early transients, then it will be redeveloped for the steady-state. 

Clearly, whether an electrode reaction appears reversible or irreversible depends both on the kinetics of electron transfer (i.e. the standard rate constant for Reaction (1.46)) and the mass transport conditions. As a guide, however, it is found that for a steady state experiment in unstirred solution. 

For many electrode processes of interest, the rates of electron transfer, and of any coupled chemical reactions, are high compared with that of steady state mass transport. Therefore during any steady state experiment, Nernstian equilibrium is maintained at the electrode and no kinetic or mechanistic information may be obtained from current or potential measurements. Apart from in a few areas of study, most notably in the field of corrosion, steady state measurements are not therefore widely used by electrochemists. For the majority of electrode processes it is only possible to determine kinetic parameters if the Nernstian equilibrium is disturbed by increasing the rate of mass transport. In this way the process is forced into a mixed control region where the rates of mass transport and of the electrode reaction are comparable. The current, or potential, is then measured as a function of the rate of mass transport, and the data are, then either extrapolated or curve fitted to obtain the desired kinetic parameters. There are basically three different ways in which the rate of mass transport may be enhanced, and these are now discussed. 

Similar considerations, most notably treating the transport to an impacted sphere as being at steady state, also allow the modelling of the APC type of impact experiment where the nanoparticle is exhaustively oxidised and in particular the prediction of the onset potential for the appearance of current spikes . Different behaviour is predicted for fast or slow (electrochemically reversible or irreversible) charge transfer kinetics.Copper and nickel nanoparticles showed slow electron transfer kinetics whereas silver nanoparticles showed reversible kinetics. The latter observation explains the fact that the onset potential for the appearance of oxidation spikes for the silver nanoparticles approximately matches the peak potential in the stripping voltammetry when the same particles are immobilised on an electrode. 

Lastly, electron transfer in D—[H]—A assemblies is not a perquisite of the excited states of metal complexes. Organic ensembles 38 and 39 (R = SiMe2 Bu), containing a dimethylaniline-anthracene redox pair, have been synthesized recently [124]. Preliminary time-resolved and steady-state fluorescence experiments indicate the occurrence of photoinduced electron transfer. In work related to Watson Crick base-paired systems, the excited state of the fluorescent pyrene derivative 40 is efficiently quenched (94-99 %) by 2 -deoxyguanosine (dG), 2 -deoxycytidine (dC), or 2 -deoxythymidine (dT) in aqueous solution [125]. A PCET mechanism is thought to be responsible for this process, as the thermodynamics of electron transfer are unfavorable unless coupled to a rapid proton-transfer step. The quenched lifetime of 40 in the presence of dC and dT in H2O is significantly extended by a factor of 1.5-2.0 in D2O this isotope effect is similar to that observed in the kinetics studies of 1 [70]. The invoked PCET reaction mechanism also accounts for the inability of dC and dT to quench the fluorescence of 40 in the aprotic organic solvent DMSO. 

In the following we consider a simple electron transfer mechanism in order to discuss quantitatively the variations in the potential location of the steady-state voltammogram of the system according to the kinetics of the heterogeneous electron transfer. In the derivation of the kinetics we consider that the solution contains only the reactant at concentration C before the electrochemical experiment. Let E°, k, and a be the standard reduction potential, the standard heterogeneous rate constant, and the transfer coefficient of the electron transfer in Eq. (176). 

Usual conditions for LSV or CV experiments require a quiet solution in order to allow undisturbed development of the diffusion layer at the electrode. Some groups, however, have purposely used the interplay between diffusion and convection in electrolytes flowing in a channel or similar devices [23]. In these experiments (see also Chapter 2.4), mass transport to the electrode surface is dramatically enhanced. A steady state develops [54] with a diffusion layer of constant thickness. Thus, such conditions are in some way similar to the use of ultramicroelectrodes. Hydro-dynamic voltammetry is advantageous in studying processes (heterogeneous electron transfer, homogeneous kinetics) that are faster than mass transport under usual CV or LSV conditions. A recent review provides several examples [22]. 

For master s degree and PhD level, this work describes the main methods used in the field of electrochemistry (steady-state and non-steady-state) and applies them to various concepts, including kinetic models for electronic transfer, double layer and electrocatalysis. There are particular chapters focused on electrocrystallization, optical and spectroscopic methods as well as designing an electrochemical experiment, covering the suitable instruments required. 

Additional experiments performed with SECM include current-distance measurements, whereby the steady-state tip current is measured as the tip is slowly moved from bulk solution toward the substrate in steps (at a fixed x-y position above the substrate), yielding a probe approach curve (RAC). Theory can be used to fit the experimentally observed PACs, permitting the extraction of rate constants for irreversible substrate kinetics (see Chapter 5). We are currently using this mode to determine electron transfer rates at A1 alloy heterogeneities, using COMSOL Multiphysics to model the PAC for a small active spot (a Cu-rich inclusion at which faster electron transfer occurs) surrounded by a less active area (the A1 alloy matrix) at which slower electron transfer occurs [11]. 

---