Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Affinity, relative

Even before recent advances in the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of ion exchange equilibria it was appreciated that cations and anions demonstrated an order of preferred affinity towards uptake by conventional resinous exchangers. The following sequences repre- [Pg.104]

Strong Acid Cation Resin (styrenic - sulfonate)  [Pg.105]

Strong Base Anion - Type 1 (styrenic - quaternary ammonium)  [Pg.105]

The slightly lower base strength of Type 2 strong base anion exchangers results in the relative affinity of hydroxide ion usually coming between that of fluoride ion and hydrogencarbonate ion. [Pg.105]


The sodium soaps of fatty acid form calcium soaps of such low solubdity that they act as their own budders. Initial soap additions precipitate the calcium ion and the soap added thereafter functions in soft water. At high temperatures, the calcium soaps are relatively soluble compared to calcium tripolyphosphate. Thus sodium tripolyphosphate (STEP) can budd (revert) soaps in a hot water wash. However, at low temperatures the relative affinity of STEP for calcium decreases so that STEP cannot budd soaps in a cold water wash. [Pg.529]

Although most /3- lactam antibiotics bind covalently to some or all of the same six proteins, there are decided differences among them in terms of their relative affinities. For example, cefoxitin (see Table 1 for structures) fails to bind to protein 2 while cephacetrile binds very slowly to proteins 5 and 6. Cephaloridine binds most avidly to protein 1, the transpeptidase, and inhibits cell elongation and causes lysis at its minimum inhibitory concentration. On the other hand, cephalexin binds preferentially to protein 3 and causes inhibition of cell division and filament formation (75PNA2999, 77MI51002). [Pg.297]

The working capacity of a sorbent depends on fluid concentrations and temperatures. Graphical depiction of soration equilibrium for single component adsorption or binary ion exchange (monovariance) is usually in the form of isotherms [n = /i,(cd or at constant T] or isosteres = pi(T) at constant /ij. Representative forms are shown in Fig. I6-I. An important dimensionless group dependent on adsorption equihbrium is the partition ratio (see Eq. 16-125), which is a measure of the relative affinities of the sorbea and fluid phases for solute. [Pg.1497]

Ion-exchange chromatography involves an electrostatic process which depends on the relative affinities of various types of ions for an immobilised assembly of ions of opposite charge. The stationary phase is an aqueous buffer with a fixed pH or an aqueous mixture of buffers in which the pH is continuously increased or decreased as the separation may require. This form of liquid chromatography can also be performed at high inlet pressures of liquid with increased column performances. [Pg.21]

In complexes with Cro, the overall bend and twist of the DNA are similar to those in the repressor complexes, but there is a significant difference in the local structure of two of the nucleotides in each half-site. Binding of 434 Cro or repressor fragment thus imposes a distinct local structure (Figure 8.13), as a result of differences in both the identity and conformations of various amino acid residues that interact with the DNA. The DNA conformational details are significant for the relative affinities of Cro and repressor for various sites, as we describe in a later section. [Pg.138]

The shapes of the titration curves of weak electrolytes are identical, as Figure 2.13 reveals. Note, however, that the midpoints of the different curves vary in a way that characterizes the particular electrolytes. The pV, for acetic acid is 4.76, the pV, for imidazole is 6.99, and that for ammonium is 9.25. These pV, values are directly related to the dissociation constants of these substances, or, viewed the other way, to the relative affinities of the conjugate bases for protons. NH3 has a high affinity for protons compared to Ac NH4 is a poor acid compared to HAc. [Pg.48]

In the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model for allosteric regulation, what values of L and relative affinities of R and T for A will lead activator A to exhibit positive homotropic effects (That is, under what conditions will the binding of A enhance further A-binding, in the same manner that S-binding shows positive coop-... [Pg.493]

As Fig. 16 shows, the preferential binding of DMSO, DMF and NMF from aqueous solution to (Lys HBr)n at low contents of the organic solvent x increases with its concentration. However, at approximately x3 = 0,2 a maximum is reached and then preferential hydration between x3 = 0,3 and 0,5 occurs. No preferential binding was observed for NMP, EG or 2 PrOH, however increasing hydration occured with x3. Only in 2 PrOH at x3 > 0,3 a-helix formation occured. Furthermore binding parameters for the systems NMP + DMSO, EG + DMSO and DMF + DMSO have been determined. An initial preferential binding of DMSO by (Lys HBr)n, a maximum and a subsequently inversion of the binding parameter was also observed in these mixtures. The order of relative affinity is DMSO > DMF > EG > NMP. In DMF/DMSO-mixtures (Lys HBr) attains an a-helical conformation above 20 vol.- % DMF and in 2-PrOH/water above 70 vol.- % 2 Pr-OH. [Pg.22]

Pseudomonas 244 cells were exposed to Bu Sn (x = 0,1,2,3) to compare the relative affinities the cells had for the differing species. The cells were exposed to 10 ppm solutions of the various tin species for over 2h hours. After treating the cells with Sn, one half of the cells were analyzed by GFAA, the other half by EMI. GFAA results are contrasted to EMI results in Table II. [Pg.92]

Column chromatographic separations depend on the relative affinity of different proteins for a given stationary phase and for the mobile phase. Association between each protein and the matrix is weak and transient. Proteins that interact more strongly with the stationary phase are retained longer. The length of time that a protein is associated with the stationary phase is a function of the composition of both the stationary and mobile phases. Optimal separation of the protein of interest from other proteins thus can be achieved by careful manipulation of the composition of the two phases. [Pg.21]

P50 Expresses the Relative Affinities of Different Hemoglobins for Oxygen... [Pg.42]

Relative affinities of different hemoglobins for oxygen are expressed as P5Q, the POj that half-saturates them with Oj. Hemoglobins samrate at the partial pressures of their respective respiratory organ, eg, the lung or placenta. [Pg.47]

Ahrland, S., Chatt, J. Davies, N. R. (1958). The relative affinities of ligand atoms for acceptor molecules and ions. Quarterly Reviews, 12, 265-76. [Pg.26]

Ahrland et al. (1958) classified a number of Lewis acids as of (a) or (b) type based on the relative affinities for various ions of the ligand atoms. The sequence of stability of complexes is different for classes (a) and (b). With acceptor metal ions of class (a), the affinities of the halide ions lie in the sequence F > Cl > Br > I , whereas with class (b), the sequence is F < Cl" < Br < I . Pearson (1963, 1968) classified acids and bases as hard (class (a)), soft (class (b)) and borderline (Table 1.23). Class (a) acids prefer to link with hard bases, whereas class (b) acids prefer soft bases. Yamada and Tanaka (1975) proposed a softness parameter of metal ions, on the basis of the parameters En (electron donor constant) and H (basicity constant) given by Edwards (1954) (Table 1.24). The softness parameter a is given by a/ a - - P), where a and p are constants characteristic of metal ions. [Pg.180]

Lipophilicity is a molecular property expressing the relative affinity of solutes for an aqueous phase and an organic, water-immiscible solvent. As such, lipophilicity encodes most of the intermolecular forces that can take place between a solute and a solvent, and represents the affinity of a molecule for a lipophilic environment. This parameter is commonly measured by its distribution behavior in a biphasic system, described by the partition coefficient of the species X, P. Thermodynamically, is defined as a constant relating the activity of a solute in two immiscible phases at equilibrium [111,112]. By convention, P is given with the organic phase as numerator, so that a positive value for log P reflects a preference for the lipid phase ... [Pg.730]

This fundamental parameter quantifies the relative affinity of an ion in the two phases, but it is not directly accessible experimentally because it is associated with a single ionic component. Therefore, to make or logP ° amenable to direct measurement,... [Pg.733]

A number of protocols are available for measuring cannabinoid-binding affinity and as such there is a variation in reported K[ values for end-ocannabinoids across labs. For this reason, wherever possible, the relative affinity compared to AEA (measured in that protocol) will be given in an attempt to provide a benchmark for comparison. [Pg.237]


See other pages where Affinity, relative is mentioned: [Pg.252]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.1217]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.538]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.71 , Pg.73 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



Anion relative solvent affinity

Comparing Relative Affinity

Estimation of Relative Binding Affinities from GPC Spin-Column ESI-MS Data

Introduction Measuring Relative BF3 Affinity by Ligand Exchange in Solution

Relative affinity coefficient

Relative affinity for chelating agents

Relative binding affinity

Relative binding affinity, RBA

Relative inhibitor affinity

© 2024 chempedia.info