Free enzyme

Increasingly, biochemical transformations are used to modify renewable resources into useful materials (see Microbial transformations). Fermentation (qv) to ethanol is the oldest of such conversions. Another example is the ceU-free enzyme catalyzed isomerization of glucose to fmctose for use as sweeteners (qv). The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose is a biochemical competitor for the acid catalyzed reaction. 

Like a noncompetitive inhibitor, an uncompetitive inhibitor does not compete with the substrate since it binds to the enzyme—substrate complex but not to the free enzyme. Uncompetitive inhibition... 

During a resolution process, the R- and S-enantiomers compete for the free enzyme to form the noncovalent enzyme—substrate complexes ES and ER. These proceed to form transition-state intermediates [ES] and [ER] ... 

Enzymatic Reactors Adding free enzyme to a batch reactor is practical only when the value of the enzyme is relatively low. With expensive enzymes, reuse by retaining the enzyme with some type of support makes great economic sense. As some activity is usually lost in tethering the enzyme and the additional operations cost money, stabihty is very important. However, many enzymes are stabilized by immobilization thus, many reuses may be possible. 

Enzyme and substrate first reversibly combine to give an enzyme-substrate (ES) complex. Chemical processes then occur in a second step with a rate constant called kcat, or the turnover number, which is the maximum number of substrate molecules converted to product per active site of the enzyme per unit time. The kcat is, therefore, a rate constant that refers to the properties and reactions of the ES complex. For simple reactions kcat is the rate constant for the chemical conversion of the ES complex to free enzyme and products. 

The Michaelis-Menten scheme nicely explains why a maximum rate, V"max, is always observed when the substrate concentration is much higher than the enzyme concentration (Figure 11.1). Vmax is obtained when the enzyme is saturated with substrate. There are then no free enzyme molecules available to turn over additional substrate. Hence, the rate is constant, Vmax, and is independent of further increase in the substrate concentration. 

Decomposition of the complex to the product and free enzyme is assumed irreversible, and rate controlling ... 

In this case, the leading substrate, A (also called the obligatory or compulsory substrate), must bind first. Then the second substrate, B, binds. Strictly speaking, B cannot bind to free enzyme in the absence of A. Reaction between A and B occurs in the ternary complex, and is usually followed by an ordered release of the products of the reaction, P and Q. In the schemes below, Q is the product of A and is released last. One representation, suggested by W. W. Cleland, follows ... 

Note that these schemes predict that A and Q compete for the free enzyme form, E, while B and P compete for the modified enzyme form, E. A and Q do not bind to E, nor do B and P combine with E. 

The catalytically active enzyme substrate complex is an interactive structure in which the enzyme causes the substrate to adopt a form that mimics the transition-state intermediate of the reaction. Thus, a poor substrate would be one that was less effective in directing the formation of an optimally active enzyme transition-state intermediate conformation. This active conformation of the enzyme molecule is thought to be relatively unstable in the absence of substrate, and free enzyme thus reverts to a conformationally different state. 

FIGURE 15.2 Enzymes regulated by covalent modification are called interconvertible enzymes. The enzymes protein kinase and protein phosphatase, in the example shown here) catalyzing the conversion of the interconvertible enzyme between its two forms are called converter enzymes. In this example, the free enzyme form is catalytically active, whereas the phosphoryl-enzyme form represents an inactive state. The —OH on the interconvertible enzyme represents an —OH group on a specific amino acid side chain in the protein (for example, a particular Ser residue) capable of accepting the phosphoryl group. 

Scheme 10.25 Dioxygen activation in cofactor-free enzymes.

Identify which of the following statements are true for immobilised biocatalysts, when compared to free enzyme or free cell systems. 

When compared to traditional chemical synthesis, processes based on biocatalysts are generally less reliable. This is due, in part, to the fact that biological systems are inherently complex. In bioprocesses involving whole cells, it is essential to use the same strain from the same culture collection to minimise problems of reproducibility. If cell free enzymes are used the reliability can depend on the purity of the enzyme preparation, for example iso-enzyme composition or the presence of other proteins. It is, therefore, important to consider the commercial source of the enzyme and the precise specifications of the biocatalyst employed. 

Process B Genetic instability Poor enzyme stability Cofactor requirement Product (non-polar) inhibition Biocatalyst Free enzyme Free cells Immobilised enzyme Immobilised cells... 

The reactivation of enzymes (after their partial inactivation in an acid medium) upon passing into a medium of pH 8 is also of great importance for oral use (Fig. 25). Enzymes immobilized in crosslinked polyelectrolytes are characterized by a structural memory even after considerable inactivation. Under changed conditions, this leads to a considerable or almost complete reactivation of the enzyme, whereas in the reactivation of a free enzyme in solution under similar conditions the enzymatic activity is restored on a lower level. 

The free enzyme can also be defined based on the following equation ... 

From the equilibrium constant, the free enzyme concentration must be defined. We know the total enzyme concentration as the sum of the conjugated enzymes with substrates and the free enzymes. 

Generally inhibitors are competitive or non-competitive with substrates. In competitive inhibition, the interaction of the enzyme with the substrate and competitive inhibitor instead of the substrate can be analysed with the sequence of reactions taking place as a result, a complex of the enzyme-inhibitor (El) is formed. The reaction sets at equilibrium and the final step shows the product is formed. The enzyme must get free, but the enzyme attached to the inhibitor does not have any chance to dissociate from the El complex. The El formed is not available for conversion of substrate free enzymes are responsible for that conversion. The presence of inhibitor can cause the reaction rate to be slower than the ordinary reaction, in the absence of the inhibitor. The sequence of reaction mechanisms is ... 

The inhibition analyses were examined differently for free lipase in a batch and immobilised lipase in membrane reactor system. Figure 5.14 shows the kinetics plot for substrate inhibition of the free lipase in the batch system, where [5] is the concentration of (S)-ibuprofen ester in isooctane, and v0 is the initial reaction rate for (S)-ester conversion. The data for immobilised lipase are shown in Figure 5.15 that is, the kinetics plot for substrate inhibition for immobilised lipase in the EMR system. The Hanes-Woolf plots in both systems show similar trends for substrate inhibition. The graphical presentation of rate curves for immobilised lipase shows higher values compared with free enzymes. The value for the... 

In non-competitive inhibition, the substrate (S) and inhibitor (I) have equal potential to bind to the free enzyme (E). The inhibitor forms a ternary complex with enzyme-substrate (ES) whereas the substrate will form another ternary complex with enzyme-inhibitor (El). Since the non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on the binding of substrate to the enzyme, the Km value remained consistent (or unchanged). There are two different ways for the formation of ESI ternary complex this complex would not form the product and therefore was decreased. Non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on substrate binding or the enzyme-substrate affinity, therefore the apparent rate constant (K ) was unchanged.5 A possible reason for product inhibition was because of the nature of 2-ethoxyethanol,... 

---