Enzymes steady-state kinetics

What this really means is that the ternary complex has such a transitory existence that it never makes up a significant fraction of the total amount of enzyme. Steady-state kinetics concerns itself only with those complexes which, by their existence, detectably alter the pattern of dependence of reaction rate on substrate concentration. The Theorell-Chance mechanism may be seen perhaps as a manifestation of highly effective catalysis. Certainly, in the case of the enzyme for which it was first described, horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, the mechanism is obeyed for good substrates i.e. short-chain primary alcohols with secondary alcohols, which are poor substrates, the ternary complex becomes kinetically significant - because it works less well [44]. 

Mn -ATP (from a folded chelate to an extended outer-sphere complex) when the nucleotide binds to pyruvate kinase. It has also been established that the substitution-inert complex Cr iL-ATP binds at the ATP binding site of the pyruvate kinase-M + complex, and studies with this magnetic probe have led to the construction of molecular models for composite complexes of this important enzyme. Steady-state kinetic studies on the Mn +-, Ni +-, and Co +-activated systems suggest that the substrates of pyruvate kinase are PEP, uncomplexed ADP, and free bivalent cations. Magnesium-complexed ADP and ATP bind at the same site on yeast phosphoglycerate kinase, as do the uncomplexed nucleotides. 

Active immobilized enzyme steady-state kinetic analysis and stability studies of the immobilized enzyme... 

Kinetic studies involving enzymes can principally be classified into steady and transient state kinetics. In tlie former, tlie enzyme concentration is much lower tlian that of tlie substrate in tlie latter much higher enzyme concentration is used to allow detection of reaction intennediates. In steady state kinetics, the high efficiency of enzymes as a catalyst implies that very low concentrations are adequate to enable reactions to proceed at measurable rates (i.e., reaction times of a few seconds or more). Typical enzyme concentrations are in the range of 10 M to 10 ], while substrate concentrations usually exceed lO M. Consequently, tlie concentrations of enzyme-substrate intermediates are low witli respect to tlie total substrate (reactant) concentrations, even when tlie enzyme is fully saturated. The reaction is considered to be in a steady state after a very short induction period, which greatly simplifies the rate laws. 

Fig. 9. The MoFe protein cycle of molybdenum nitrogenase. This cycle depicts a plausible sequence of events in the reduction of N2 to 2NH3 + H2. The scheme is based on well-characterized model chemistry (15, 105) and on the pre-steady-state kinetics of product formation by nitrogenase (102). The enzymic process has not been chsiracter-ized beyond M5 because the chemicals used to quench the reactions hydrolyze metal nitrides. As in Fig. 8, M represents an aji half of the MoFe protein. Subscripts 0-7 indicate the number of electrons trsmsferred to M from the Fe protein via the cycle of Fig. 8.

The mechanism of the first half-reaction has been studied by a combination of reductive titrations with CO and sodium dithionite and pre-steady-state kinetic studies by rapid freeze quench EPR spectroscopy (FQ-EPR) and stopped-flow kinetics 159). These combined studies have led to the following mechanism. The resting enzyme is assumed to have a metal-bound hydroxide nucleophile. Evidence for this species is based on the similarities between the pH dependence of the EPR spectrum of Cluster C and the for the for CO, deter-... 

In conclusion, the steady-state kinetics of mannitol phosphorylation catalyzed by II can be explained within the model shown in Fig. 8 which was based upon different types of experiments. Does this mean that the mechanisms of the R. sphaeroides II " and the E. coli II are different Probably not. First of all, kinetically the two models are only different in that the 11 " model is an extreme case of the II model. The reorientation of the binding site upon phosphorylation of the enzyme is infinitely fast and complete in the former model, whereas competition between the rate of reorientation of the site and the rate of substrate binding to the site gives rise to the two pathways in the latter model. The experimental set-up may not have been adequate to detect the second pathway in case of II " . The important differences between the two models are at the level of the molecular mechanisms. In the II " model, the orientation of the binding site is directly linked to the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme, whereas in the II" model, the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme modulates the activation energy of the isomerization of the binding site between the two sides of the membrane. Steady-state kinetics by itself can never exclusively discriminate between these different models at the molecular level since a condition may be proposed where these different models show similar kinetics. The II model is based upon many different types of data discussed in this chapter and the steady-state kinetics is shown to be merely consistent with the model. Therefore, the II model is more likely to be representative for the mechanisms of E-IIs. 

Figure 2.8 Relationship between steady state kinetic constants and specific portions of the enzyme reaction pathway.

For our purposes the most important factor that can impact the individual steady state kinetic constants is the presence of an inhibitor. We will see in Chapter 3 how specific modes of inhibitor interactions with target enzymes can be diagnosed by the effects that the inhibitors have on the three steady state kinetic constants. 

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the free enzyme (i.e., for which a = °°) is said to be competitive because the binding of the inhibitor and the substrate to the enzyme are mutually exclusive hence these inhibitors compete with the substrate for the pool of free enzyme molecules. Referring back to the relationships between the steady state kinetic constants and the steps in catalysis (Figure 2.8), one would expect inhibitors that conform to this mechanism to affect the apparent value of KM (which relates to formation of the enzyme-substrate complex) and VmJKM, but not the value of Vmax (which relates to the chemical steps subsequent to ES complex formation). The presence of a competitive inhibitor thus influences the steady state velocity equation as described by Equation (3.1) ... 

In this chapter we described the thermodynamics of enzyme-inhibitor interactions and defined three potential modes of reversible binding of inhibitors to enzyme molecules. Competitive inhibitors bind to the free enzyme form in direct competition with substrate molecules. Noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and to the ES complex or subsequent enzyme forms that are populated during catalysis. Uncompetitive inhibitors bind exclusively to the ES complex or to subsequent enzyme forms. We saw that one can distinguish among these inhibition modes by their effects on the apparent values of the steady state kinetic parameters Umax, Km, and VmdX/KM. We further saw that for bisubstrate reactions, the inhibition modality depends on the reaction mechanism used by the enzyme. Finally, we described how one may use the dissociation constant for inhibition (Kh o.K or both) to best evaluate the relative affinity of different inhibitors for ones target enzyme, and thus drive compound optimization through medicinal chemistry efforts. 

A steady-state kinetics study for Hod was pursued to establish the substrate binding pattern and product release, using lH-3-hydroxy-4-oxoquinoline as aromatic substrate. The reaction proceeds via a ternary complex, by an ordered-bi-bi-mechanism, in which the first to bind is the aromatic substrate then the 02 molecule, and the first to leave the enzyme-product complex is CO [359], Another related finding concerns that substrate anaerobically bound to the enzyme Qdo can easily be washed off by ultra-filtration [360] and so, the formation of a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate seems unlikely in the... 

The reduction of 7,8-dihydrofolate (H2F) to 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate (H4F) has been analyzed extensively14 26-30 and a kinetic scheme for E. Coli DHFR was proposed in which the steady-state kinetic parameters as well as the full time course kinetics under a variety of substrate concentrations and pHs were determined. From these studies, the pKa of Asp27 is 6.5 in the ternary complex between the enzyme, the cofactor NADPH and the substrate dihydrofolate. The second observation is that, contrary to earlier results,27 the rate determining step involves dissociation of the product from the enzyme, rather than hydride ion transfer from the cofactor to the substrate. 

Steady state kinetics and protein-protein binding measurements have also been reported for the interaction of these mutant cytochromes with bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase [120]. The binding of cytochrome c variants to the oxidase occurred with increasing values of Kj in the order He (3 x 10 Mol L ) < Leu = Gly < wild-type < Tyr < Ser (3 x 10 molL ). Steady-state kinetic analysis indicated that the rate of electron transfer with cytochrome c oxidase increased in the order Ser < He < Gly < Leu < Tyr < wild-type, an order notably different from that observed for a related analysis of the oxidation of these mutants by cytochrome c peroxidase [85]. This difference in order of mutant turnover by the oxidase and peroxidase may arise from differences in the mode of interaction of the cytochrome with these two enzymes. 

Henderson PJ. 1972. A linear equation that describes the steady-state kinetics of enzymes and subceUular particles interacting with tightly bound inhibitors. Biochem J 127 321. 

Protein concentrations are often reported in terms of mass per unit volume (eg., mg/ml) or in units of activity per volume. Care should be exercised when using these forms of concentrations. To have valid steady-state kinetics, the total enzyme concentration must be much less than the substrate concentration. Hence, one should always be cognizant of the true concentration of active enzyme in terms of molarity. 

In steady-state kinetic studies, the total concentration of the enzyme should be much less than the concentration of the substrate(s), product(s), and effector(s) typically, by at least a thousandfold. When this condition is not true, the steady-state condition will not be valid and other methods, such as global analysis, have to be utilized to analyze the kinetic data. 

Kinetics of O-Methylaiion. The steady state kinetic analysis of these enzymes (41,42) was consistent with a sequential ordered reaction mechanism, in which 5-adenosyl-L-methionine and 5-adenosyl-L-homocysteine were leading reaction partners and included an abortive EQB complex. Furthermore, all the methyltransferases studied exhibited competitive patterns between 5-adenosyl-L-methionine and its product, whereas the other patterns were either noncompetitive or uncompetitive. Whereas the 6-methylating enzyme was severely inhibited by its respective flavonoid substrate at concentrations close to Km, the other enzymes were less affected. The low inhibition constants of 5-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (Table I) suggests that earlier enzymes of the pathway may regulate the rate of synthesis of the final products. 

A number of cases are known in which the properties of an enzyme are markedly altered by interaction with a membrane. Of course, in some cases the normal function of an enzyme is destroyed when it is removed from the membrane. For example, the mitochondrial coupling factor cannot synthesize ATP when removed from the membrane, since coupling to a proton gradient is required. The portion of the coupling factor that is easily solubilized (F,) is an ATPase. The steady-state kinetic properties of this solubilized ATPase are appreciably changed when it is reconstituted with mitochondrial membranes The turnover numbers and pH dependencies are different the solubilized enzyme is strongly inhibited by ADP, whereas the reconstituted enzyme is not and the reconstituted enzyme is inhibited by oligomycin, whereas the solubilized enzyme is not. 

When the enzyme is first mixed with a large excess of substrate, there is an initial period, the pre-steady state, during which the concentration of ES builds up. This period is usually too short to be easily observed, lasting just microseconds. The reaction quickly achieves a steady state in which [ES] (and the concentrations of any other intermediates) remains approximately constant over time. The concept of a steady state was introduced by G. E. Briggs and Haldane in 1925. The measured V0 generally reflects the steady state, even though V0 is limited to the early part of the reaction, and analysis of these initial rates is referred to as steady-state kinetics. 

Reversible Inhibition One common type of reversible inhibition is called competitive (Fig. 6-15a). A competitive inhibitor competes with the substrate for the active site of an enzyme. While the inhibitor (I) occupies the active site it prevents binding of the substrate to the enzyme. Many competitive inhibitors are compounds that resemble the substrate and combine with the enzyme to form an El complex, but without leading to catalysis. Even fleeting combinations of this type will reduce the efficiency of the enzyme. By taking into account the molecular geometry of inhibitors that resemble the substrate, we can reach conclusions about which parts of the normal substrate bind to the enzyme. Competitive inhibition can be analyzed quantitatively by steady-state kinetics. In the presence of a competitive inhibitor, the Michaelis-Menten equation (Eqn 6-9) becomes... 

The first evidence for a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate came from a classic application of pre-steady state kinetics. In addition to its action on polypeptides,... 

FIGURE 6-19 Pre-steady state kinetic evidence for an acyl-enzyme intermediate. The hydrolysis of p-nitrophenylacetate by chymotrypsin is measured by release of p-nitrophenoi (a colored product). Initially, the reaction releases a rapid burst of p-nitrophenol nearly stoichiometric with the amount of enzyme present. This reflects the fast acylation phase of the reaction. The subsequent rate is slower, because enzyme turnover is limited by the rate of the slower deacylation phase. 

---