Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Source constraints

If the assumption that the contaminant mass in the wastewater is relaxed, then the additional raw material in the form of the contaminant mass has to be accounted for. The wastewater in this case not only supplements the water in the raw material, but also any other raw materials used in product formulation. The raw material balance given in constraint (8.1) is reformulated to account for the additional raw material source. Constraint (8.1) is split into a water balance and a raw material balance for the other components required in product formulation. The water balance is given in constraint (8.52). The balance for the other components used in the product formulation is given in constraint (8.53). Due to the fixed ratio of water and other components in product formulation and the fixed batch size, the amount of water and the amount of other components are fixed. Therefore, in constraints (8.52) and (8.53) the amount of water and amount of other raw material is fixed. The water balance, in constraint (8.52), states that the amount of water used in product is comprised of freshwater, water from storage and directly recycle/reused water. Constraint (8.53), the mass balance for the other components, states that the mass of other components used for product is the mass from bulk storage, the mass in directly recycled/reused water and the mass in water from storage. [Pg.186]

NCRP (1993a) also has emphasized the importance of source constraints in radiation protection of the public. NCRP has reaffirmed a previous recommendation (NCRP, 1984b 1987a) that whenever the potential exists for routine exposure of an individual member of the public to exceed 25 percent of the limit on annual effective dose as a result of irradiation attributable to a single site, the site operator should ensure that the annual effective dose to the maximally exposed individual from all man-made sources combined does not exceed 1 mSv on a continuous basis. Alternatively, if such an assessment is not conducted, no single source or set of sources under one control should result in an individual receiving an annual effective dose of more than 0.25 mSv. [Pg.236]

When are the parameter estimates from the noncompartmental model equal to those from a linear, constant-coefficient compartmental model As DiStefano and Landaw (22) explain, they are equal when the equivalent sink and source constraints are valid. The equivalent source constraint means that all... [Pg.103]

Similar results hold for the constant infusion or generic input. In other words, the parameters can be shown to be equal if the equivalent sink and source constraints are valid. Again, the interested reader is referred to Cobelli and Toffolo (3) or Coveil et al. (4) for details and for consideration of the situation in which the equivalent source and sink constraints are not valid. [Pg.105]

S. T. Grilli, M. loualalen, J. Asavanant, F. Shi, J. T. Kirby, P. Watts, Source constraints and model simulation of the December 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami, J. Waterway, Port, Goastal Ocean Eng. ASGE 133 6), 414-428 (2007). [Pg.259]

Munker, C. (1998). Nb/Ta fractionation in a Cambrian arc/back arc system. New Zealand Source constraints and application of refined ICPMS techniques. Chem. Geol. 144(1-2), 23. [Pg.246]

To these technological constraints are added an increasing preoccupation with limiting the evaporation losses that are an important source of atmospheric pollution (Me Arragher et al., 1990). [Pg.190]

CE uses holonomic constraints. In a constrained system the coordinates of the particles 5t independent and the equations of motion in each of the coordinate directions are cted. A second difficulty is that the magnitude of the constraint forces is unknown, in the case of the box on the slope, the gravitational force acting on the box is in the ction whereas the motion is down the slope. The motion is thus not in the same direc-s the gravitational force. As such, the total force on the box can be considered to arise wo sources one due to gravity and the other a constraint force that is perpendicular to otion of the box (Figure 7.8). As there is no motion perpendicular to the surface of the the constraint force does no work. [Pg.386]

MOPAC runs in batch mode using an ASCII input hie. The input hie format is easy to use. It consists of a molecular structure dehned either with Cartesian coordinates or a Z-matrix and keywords for the type of calculation. The program has a very versatile set of options for including molecular geometry and symmetry constraints. Version 6 and older have limits on the size of molecule that can be computed due to the use of hxed array sizes, which can be changed by recompiling the source code. This input format allows MOPAC to be run in conjunction with a batch job-queueing system. [Pg.342]

Operational Constraints and Problems. Synthetic ammonia manufacture is a mature technology and all fundamental technical problems have been solved. However, extensive know-how in the constmction and operation of the faciUties is required. Although apparendy simple in concept, these facihties are complex in practice. Some of the myriad operational parameters, such as feedstock source or quaUty, change frequendy and the plant operator has to adjust accordingly. Most modem facihties rely on computers to monitor and optimize performance on a continual basis. This situation can produce problems where industrial expertise is lacking. [Pg.84]

Recycle refers to the utilization of a pollutant-laden stream (a source) in a process unit (a sink). Each sink has a number of constraints on the characteristics (e g, flowrate and composition) of feed that it can process. If a source satisfies these constraints it may be directly recycled to or reused in the sink. However, if the source violates these constraints segregation, mixing, and/or interception may be used to prepare the stream for recycle. [Pg.12]

On the source-sink mapping diagram, sources are represented by shaded circles and sinks are represented by hollow circles. Typically, process constraints limit the range of pollutant composition and load that each sink can accept. ITie intersection of these two bands provides a zone of acceptable conqKisition and load for recycle. If a source (e.g., source a) lies within this zone, it can be directly recycled to tiie sink (e.g., sink S). Moreover, sources b and c can be mixed using the lever-arm principle to create a mixed stream that can be recycled to sink S. [Pg.85]

The scope of the previously addressed CE case study is now altered to allow for stream segregation, mixing, and recycle within the ethyl chloride plant. There are five sinks the reactor (u = 1), the first scrubber (u = 2), the second scrubber (u = 3), the mixing tank (u = 4) and the biotreatment facility for effluent treatment (m = 5). There are six sources of CE-laden aqueous streams (in = 1-6). There is the potential for segregating two liquid sources (lu = 2, 4). The following process constraints should be considered ... [Pg.176]

However, moving the support zone farther from the source of contamination often brings up logistical problems associated with the distance. The logistics should be considered at all times. No matter how open the space is, there are always distance constraints. [Pg.67]

Table 13.17 lists some of the important considerations for the different fume capture techniques. From the point of view of cost effectiveness, the usual preference is source collection or a low-level hood, provided an acceptable scheme can be developed within the process, operating, and layout constraints. The cost of fume control systems is almost a direct function of the gas volume being handled. Flence, the lower volume requirements for the source capture or low-level hood approach often results in significant capital and operating cost savings for the fume control system. [Pg.1275]

The use of canopy hoods or remote capture of fume is usually considered only after the rejection of source or local hood capture concepts. The common reasons for rejecting source or local hood capture are usually operating interference problems or layout constraints. In almost all cases, a canopy hood system represents an expensive fume collection approach from both capital and opetating cost considerations. Remote capture depends on buoyant ait curtents to carry the contaminated gas to a canopy hood. The rising fume on its way to the hood is often subjected to cross-drafts within the ptocess buildings or deflected away from the hood by objects such as cranes. For many of these canopy systems, the capture efficiency of fume may be as low as 30-50%. [Pg.1279]

Rossiter (1986) demonstrated the procedure for the production process of crystalline common salt from brine. It was found that the optimal median size is determined by the entrainment limit in the crystallizer. The crystallizer had to be operated at maximum allowable temperature and the slurry density measured for quality constraints. It was also suggested that cost discontinuities should be imposed based on temperatures of the available heat sources, possible materials of construction and other intrinsic properties of the system. [Pg.272]

It may be necessaiy to position flame arresters away from heat sources that could cause the allowable operating temperature of the arrester to be exceeded. Positioning must be made with due consideration of DDT constraints. See Table 5-4, which shows the relationship of run-up distance to... [Pg.119]

Now it is realized that there are developing constraints on the utilizable sources of fuel and energy that feed the entire kinetic complex of human society. The prospect of the primary rate constants becoming limiting, diminishing, or even vanishing, places the associated problems high on the... [Pg.440]


See other pages where Source constraints is mentioned: [Pg.149]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.2158]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.812]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.1]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.148 , Pg.236 ]




SEARCH



Equivalent Sink and Source Constraints

Source constraints standards

© 2024 chempedia.info