Capturing hood

Rim exhausts are a specific application of slot hoods, which in turn are a type of exterior or capture hood. Rim exhausts are slot hoods placed along the rim or edge of an area source such as an open surface tank or vessel opening. Open surface tanks are widely used in indu.strial settings for cleaning, stripping. 

On oxygen steel conversion furnaces, primary fume control is usually achieved by a separate close-capture hood positioned over the vessel mouth. The enclosure is then used for secondary fume control during charging, turndown, tapping, and slagging. 

The nature of the preceding analysis does not permit the application of the technique to design of local capture hoods but rather to the design of remote or canopy fume hoods. For this approach to be valid, the hoods must usually be at least two source diameters away from the emission source. 

Canopy hoods A capture hood located above a process, designed to provide a suitable capture velocity to ensure the safe removal of the contaminant produced by the process. 

Spot ventilation or capture hoods may be used as appropriate. 

Despite limitations, specific ventilation capture systems provide effective control of emissions of toxic vapors or dusts if they are installed and used correctly. A separate, dedicated exhaust system is recommended. The capture system should not be attached to an existing hood duct unless fan capacity is increased and airflow to both hoods is properly balanced. One important consideration is the effect that such added local exhaust systems will have on the ventilation for the rest of the laboratory. Each additional capture hood will be a new exhaust port in the laboratory and will compete with the existing exhaust sources for supply air. 

Fixed capturing hood (90.00 % reduction) No localized controls (0.00 % reduction)... 

When siting a capture hood or slot, advantage should be taken of the natural movement of the pollutants as they are released. For example, hot substances and gases are lighter than air and tend to rise, thus overhead capture might be most suitable, whereas some solvent vapours when in concentrated form are heavier than air and tend to roll along horizontal surfaces and pour downwards, so capture points are best placed at the side or below. Care must be taken to ensure that all contaminants are drawn away from the breathing zone of the worker - this particularly applies to places where workers have to lean over or get close to their work. It is important to note that whenever extract ventilation is exhausted outside, a suitably heated supply of make-up air must be provided to replace that volume of air discarded. 

When siting a capture hood or slot, advantage should be taken of the natural movement of the pollutants as they are released. For example, hot substances and gases are lighter than air and tend to rise, thus overhead capture might be most suitable, whereas some solvent vapours when in concentrate form are heavier than air and tend to roll along horizontal... 

Three types of hoods are used in these systems capture hoods, enclosing hoods and receiving hoods. 

Enclosure hood Receiving hood Capturing hood... 

Design hoods to exhaust the minimum quantity of air necessary to ensure pollutant capture. 

Steps such as the substitution of low sulfur fuels or nonvolatile solvents, change of taw materials, lowering of operation temperatures to reduce NO formation or vo1ati1i2ation of process material, and instaHion of weU-designed hoods (31—37) at emission points to effectively reduce the air quantity needed for pollutant capture are illustrations of the above principles. 

To remove all decomposition products, a "total-capture" exhaust hood is recommended. 

Basic oxygen furnaces oxygen blowing Fumes, smoke, CO, particulates (dust) Proper hooding (capturing of emissions and dilute CO), scrubbers, or electrostatic precipitator... 

The pollutant-capturing efficiency of local ventilation systems depends on hood design, the hood s positioning near the source of contamination, and the... 

For nonenclosing hoods, the airflow rate that allows contaminant capture is called a target airfloitO The target airflow rate is proportional to some characteristic flow rate Qg that depends on the type of contaminant source ... 

Room air currents favorable to capture Contaminants of low toxicity or of nuisance value only Intermittent, low production Large hood large air mass in motion... 

Numerical simulation of hood performance is complex, and results depend on hood design, flow restriction by surrounding surfaces, source strength, and other boundary conditions. Thus, most currently used method.s of hood design are based on experimental studies and analytical models. According to these models, the exhaust airflow rate is calculated based on the desired capture velocity at a particular location in front of the hood. It is easier... 

Local ventilation in industry usually differs from the description above in that it is connected to a local exhaust hood (Chapter 10), which has a capture efficiency less than 100%. The capture efficiency is defined as the amount of contaminants captured by the exhaust hood per time divided by the amount of contaminants generated per each time (see Section 10.5). Figure 8.3 outlines a model for a recirculation system with a specific exhaust hood. Here, the whole system could be situated inside the workroom as one unit or made up of separate units connected with tubes, with some parts outside the workroom. For the calculation model it makes no difference as long as the exhaust hood and the return air supply are inside the room. 

This latter equation can also be used for systems without a local exhaust hood by setting the capture efficiency to zero. It could also be used to show the result of recirculation from, e.g., a laboratory fume hood with immediate recirculation. In such a hood all contaminants are generated within the hood and usually also all generated contaminants are captured, so the capture efficiency is 1. The equation demonstrates that if the... 

FIGURE 8.3 Model of a local recirculating system with a local exhaust hood, used for calculating the connection between contaminant concentrations, airflow rates, contamirtartt source strength, q , air cleaner efficiency, n and hood capture efficiency, a. is the concentration in the supply (outside) air c (equal to c h) is the concentration in the room Is the concentration in the returned air is the supply flow rate to the room equal to the exhaust flow rate, the recirculated flow rate (through the cleaner) is T is the time constant for the room and V is the room volume. 

Many different measures of local ventilation performance exist. These measures can be divided into three main categories capture velocities, capture efficiencies, and containment efficiencies. Table 10.1 shows the connections between hood types and different efficiency measurements. Section 10.5 describes procedures for measuring each of these performance measures. 

FIGURE 10.6 Definition of capture efficiency, a, M = contaminant source rate, m = contaminant transport (directly) into the exhaust hood, a — m/M. 

A laboratory study of surface-treatment tanks by Braconnier et al." showed the effects of cross-drafts and obstructions to airflow on capture efficiency. They found that, without obstructions, capture efficiency decreased with increasing cnrss-draft velocity but the importance of this effect depended on freeboard height. In their study, cross-draft direction was always perpendicular to the hood face and directed opposite to the hood suction flow. Follow cro.ss-draft velocities (less than 0.2 m s ), efficiency remained close to 1.0 for the three freeboard heights studied. With higher cross-draft velocities, efficiency decreased as freeboard height decreased. For example, when the crossdraft velocity was 0.55 m s , efficiency decreased from 0.90 to 0.86 to 0.67 as freeboard height decreased from 0.3 m to 0.15 m to 0.1 m, respectively. 

A similar effect was observed for changes in hood flow rate. With a fixed cross-draft velocity, capture efficiency decreased with decreasing hood flow rate. This effect was much more important when freeboard height was small. Their results showed that when hood flow rate was 1.5 m s m, efficiency remained close to 1.0 as long as the cross-draft velocin. was less than 0.45 in s. The most severe conditions tested were a hood flow rate equal to 0.33 m s" nr- and crossdraft velocity equal to 1.15 m s. Under these conditions, capture efficiency was equal to 0.83 for freeboard hei t equal to 0.3 m, but decreasing to 0.4 when freeboard height was decreased to 0.1 m. 

Cross-draft velocity was normalized by dividing the measured cross-draft ve-locit by the capture velocity calculated at the tatik centerline. Capture velocity at the tank centerline was calculated using Silverman s - centerline velocity (Eq. (JO.l)) for unflanged slot hoods. There was considerable scatter in the data, show ing chat cross-draft velocity alone is not responsible for low capture efficiency. 

FIGURE 10.9 Hood capture efficiency versus normalized cross-draft velocity, ... 

---