Solid Phase Clean-Up

A powerful tool now employed is that of diode array detection (DAD). This function allows peaks detected by UV to be scanned, and provides a spectral profile for each suspected microcystin. Microcystins have characteristic absorption profiles in the wavelength range 200-300 nm, and these can be used as an indication of identity without the concomitant use of purified microcystin standards for all variants. A HPLC-DAD analytical method has also been devised for measurement of intracellular and extracellular microcystins in water samples containing cyanobacteria. This method involves filtration of the cyanobacteria from the water sample. The cyanobacterial cells present on the filter are extracted with methanol and analysed by HPLC. The filtered water is subjected to solid-phase clean-up using C g cartridges, before elution with methanol and then HPLC analysis. 

OG Roch, G Blunden, RD Coker, S Nawaz. The validation of a solid phase clean-up procedure for the analysis of aflatoxins in groundnut cake using HPLC. Anal Food Clin Methods. Section 93-98, 1994. 

Siren H, Hyvonen H, Saarinen M, et al. 1992. Comparison of HPLC and solid phase clean-up methods for identification of PCBs in cod-liver oil by HRGC/MS-SIM technique. Chromatographia 34(5-8) 421-430. 

The proposed proeedure are detailed next eaeh SPMD was mierowave-assisted extraeted twiee with 30 mL hexane aeetone, and irradiated with 250 W power output, until 90°C in 10 minutes, being this temperature held for another 10 minutes. Clean-up of extraet was performed by aeetonitrile-hexane partitioning eoupled by a solid-phase extraetion with a eombined eartridge of 2 g basie-alumina (deaetivated with 5% water) and 0.5 g C. ... 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) are excellent alternatives to traditional extraction methods, with both being used independently for clean-up and/or analyte concentration prior to chromatographic analysis. While SFE has been demonstrated to be an excellent method for extracting organic compounds from solid matrices such as soil and food (36, 37), SPE has been mainly used for diluted liquid samples such as water, biological fluids and samples obtained after-liquid-liquid extraction on solid matrices (38, 39). The coupling of these two techniques (SPE-SFE) turns out to be an interesting method for the quantitative transfer... 

A method which uses supercritical fluid/solid phase extraction/supercritical fluid chromatography (SE/SPE/SEC) has been developed for the analysis of trace constituents in complex matrices (67). By using this technique, extraction and clean-up are accomplished in one step using unmodified SC CO2. This step is monitored by a photodiode-array detector which allows fractionation. Eigure 10.14 shows a schematic representation of the SE/SPE/SEC set-up. This system allowed selective retention of the sample matrices while eluting and depositing the analytes of interest in the cryogenic trap. Application to the analysis of pesticides from lipid sample matrices have been reported. In this case, the lipids were completely separated from the pesticides. 

The first bioanalytical application of LC-GC was presented by Grob et al. (119). These authors proposed this coupled system for the determination of diethylstilbe-strol in urine as a replacement for GC-MS. After hydrolysis, clean-up by solid-phase extraction and derivatization by pentafluorobenzyl bromide, the extract was separated with normal-phase LC by using cyclohexane/1 % tetrahydrofuran (THE) at a flow-rate of 260 p.l/min as the mobile phase. The result of LC-UV analysis of a urine sample and GC with electron-capture detection (ECD) of the LC fraction are shown in Ligures 11.8(a) and (b), respectively. The practical detection limits varied between about 0.1 and 0.3 ppb, depending on the urine being analysed. By use of... 

Figure 13,12 Illusti ation of the clean-up method, showing the analysis of an air sample (a) with and (b) without column switching. Details of the analytical conditions are given in the text. Reprinted from Journal of Chromatography, A 697, R R. Kootsti a and H. A. Herbold, Automated solid-phase exti action and coupled-column reversed-phase liquid cltromatogra-phy for the trace-level determination of low-molecular-mass carbonyl compounds in ak , pp. 203-211, copyright 1995, with permission from Elsevier Science.

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been by far the most important method for separating chlorophylls. Open column chromatography and thin layer chromatography are still used for clean-up procedures to isolate and separate carotenoids and other lipids from chlorophylls and for preparative applications, but both are losing importance for analytical purposes due to their low resolution and have been replaced by more effective techniques like solid phase, supercritical fluid extraction and counter current chromatography. The whole analysis should be as brief as possible, since each additional step is a potential source of epimers and allomers. 

Pretreatment of hair samples also includes an extraction, usually with an alkaline sodium hydroxide solution, followed by cleaning up with LLE with n-hexane/ethyl acetate. Instead of LLE, the employment of SPE is also possible. Furthermore, the solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with head-space analysis is usable [104-106]. In the case of using hair samples, possible external contamination (e.g., by passive smoking of Cannabis) has to be considered as false positive result. False positive results can be avoided by washing of the hair samples previous to extraction [107]. Storage of collected samples is another important fact that can cause false results in their content of A9-THC and metabolites [108-110]. 

Miller and Hawthorne [416] have developed a chromatographic method that allows subcritical (hot/liquid) water to be used as a mobile phase for packed-column RPLC with solute detection by FID, UV or F also PHWE-LC-GC-FTD couplings are used. Before LC elution the extract is dried in a solid-phase trap to remove the water. In analogy to SFE-SFC, on-line coupled superheated water extraction-superheated water chromatography (SWE-SWC) has been proposed [417]. On-line sample extraction, clean-up and fractionation increases sensitivity, avoids contamination and minimises sources of error. 

Principles and Characteristics Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is a very popular sample preparation and clean-up technique. In SPE solutes are extracted from a liquid (or gaseous) phase into a solid phase. Substances that have been extracted by the solid particles can be removed by washing with an appropriate liquid eluent. Usually, the volume of solvent needed for complete elution of the analytes is much smaller (typically < 1 mL) than the original sample volume. A concentration of the analytes is thus achieved. 

Table 3.46 compares SPME and SPE. Although SPME has in common with SPE that the analytes are concentrated by adsorption into a solid phase, SPE involves absorbing the analyte from the sample onto a modified solid support. In practice, the two techniques are quite different. SPME differs from conventional SPE in that SPE isolates the majority of the analyte from a sample (>90%) but injects only about 1 to 2% of the sample onto the GC. SPME isolates a much smaller quantity of analyte (2-20%), but that entire sample is injected into the GC. SPME is easy-to-perform and often significantly more rapid and simpler than SPE, but its quantitative aspect is exacting. Both conventional SPE and SPME minimise the use of solvents for sample preparation and free analysts from tedious sample clean-up. Where SPE can replace LLE... 

Especially in the case of solid substances, waste management is responsible for the clean-up of the technosphere, i.e. collection and disposal of the chemical in question. With respect to hazardous compounds in used goods, tools have been developed to phase out these goods for special recycling procedures or safe disposal. 

Representative Samples and Sample Storage. Sample Concentration and Clean-up Solid Phase Extraction. 

Application of SPE to sample clean-up started in 1977 with the introduction of disposable cartridges packed with silica-based bonded phase sorbents. The solid phase extraction term was devised in 1982. The most commonly cited advantages of SPE over liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) as practiced on a macroscale include the reduced time and labor requirements, use of much lower volumes of solvents, minimal risk of emulsion formation, selectivity achievable when desired, wide choices of sorbents, and amenability to automation. The principle of operation consists of four steps (1) conditioning of the sorbent with a solvent and water or buffer, (2) loading of the sample in an aqueous or aqueous low organic medium, (3) washing away unwanted components with a suitable combination of solvents, and (4) elution of the desired compound with an appropriate organic solvent. 

The most common (off-line) sample preparation procedures after protein precipitation are solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction. Multiple vendors and available chemistries utilize 96-well plates for solid phase extraction systems and liquid-liquid extraction procedures. Both extraction process can prepare samples for HPLC/MS/MS assay. Jemal et al.110 compared liquid-liquid extraction in a 96-well plate to semi-automated solid phase extraction in a 96-well plate for a carboxylic acid containing analyte in a human plasma matrix and reported that both clean-up procedures worked well. Yang et al.111 112 described two validated methods for compounds in plasma using semi-automated 96-well plate solid phase extraction procedures. Zimmer et al.113 compared solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction to a turbulent flow chromatography clean-up for two test compounds in plasma all three clean-up approaches led to HPLC/MS/MS assays that met GLP requirements. 

As a general rule, APCI is less likely to demonstrate matrix effects and ESI is more likely to be affected by matrix effects. Sample clean-up is another important factor—protein precipitation is more likely to result in matrix effects than is solid phase extraction. Matrix effects may be caused by sample constituents that are not parts of the biological matrix. Mei et al.126 129 showed that certain brands of sample tube containers can produce matrix effects. They also demonstrated that Li-heparin, a common anticoagulant for plasma samples, can produce significant matrix effects... 

Solid phase extraction (SPE) is fast and can work as a clean-up method when combined with capillary electrophoresis or used prior to HPLC/MS.34-37 Kerns et al.35 described an online alternating parallel SPE column with MS/MS detection and a turn-around time of 1.1 min. 

Pre-concentration methods using online trace enrichment by applying chromatographic principles are also reported [66,69]. As described by Guzman and Meyers [71,72], this can be achieved by incorporating e.g. a solid-phase CE-concentrator tip at the inlet of the capillary. Undesired sample components can be flushed out prior to the CE separation run, providing faster and more specific analyses. Especially in the field of bioanalysis, where sample clean up and pre-concentration of analytes is usually critical, this approach may be preferred. 

The Gilson Aspec automatic sample preparation system is a fully automated system for solid-phase extraction on disposable columns and online HPLC analysis. The Aspec system offers total automation and total control of the entire sample preparation process including clean-up and concentration. In addition, Aspec can automatically inject prepared samples into on-line HPLC systems. 

A clean-up step may be employed using gel permeation chromatography, Florisil, silica gel or alumina column fractionation, or solid phase extraction (SPE). 

---