Sample Preparation and Injection

The PCR samples to be analyzed consist of many components, all of which may potentially enter the capillary. Of particular concern are the salts, which will affect sample injection, migration, and peak shape. Since it is preferable not to perform any sample preparation prior to analysis, the method of injection of the PCR product must be examined. In some cases, some sample pretreatment is required to optimize resolution and sensitivity. 

With replaceable gels, either an electrokinetic or a hydrodynamic approach to sample introduction is possible. The hydrodynamic injection is generally preferred when quantitation of the PCR product is desired. In this case, the sample, introduced as a plug into the capillary, is exactly the same as that of the sample vial from which it originated. Negative components (Cl , dNTPs, 

Desalting techniques include ultrafiltration, which simultaneously desalts and concentrates the sample membrane dialysis (Cooksy, 1992) and simple dilution in low ionic strength buffer or water. The latter method is especially useful when glycerol, Triton X-100, or formamide has been added to the PCR mixture. It should be noted that loss of DNA from adsorption onto the filters in ultrafiltration has been reported (Butler et al., 1994). Thus, as a rule, sample desalting by this method should be used as a last resort. 

---

The solvents used in extraction may affect subsequent chromatography. Precolumn hyphenation is considered to be much more difficult and critical than the more developed postcolumn hyphenation. Sample preparation and injection are considerable bottlenecks in terms of ruggedness. 

Gel Permeation Chromatography. A Water Associates model 200 gel permeation chromatograph fitted with five Styragel columns having nominal porosity designations 107, 107,106, 1.5 X 105, and 1.5 X 104 A was used for the analysis of molecular weight distribution in TFE at a temperature of 50.0 0.5°C and a flow rate of 1.00 =t 0.05 ml/min. Further details concerning instrumental and operational parameters, sample preparation and injection, and data acquisition and reduction have been reported elsewhere (I). 

Among the above-mentioned methods, SPME is relatively new. It combines sample preparation and injection of the sample into one step. Analytes are adsorbed on a polymeric fiber coated with a stationary phase such as polydimethylsiloxane, which is thermally desorbed in the injection port at 250 °C. The successful use of the technique for the GC/MS analysis of the nerve agents in water has been described (42). Levels of less than... 

Choosing an internal standard to correct errors due to sample preparation and injection reduced the impact of variability on the final trueness and precision of the developed method. Peak area can be corrected (peak area/migration time) to avoid the migration time drift influence, because of the temperature affecting both electro-osmosis and electrophoretic mobilities as well as buffer electrolysis, adsorption into the capillary wall and so on. 

A frequent use of GC with polymers is in the quantitative determination of residual monomer and solvent content, even at sub parts per million levels. This is especially important in food contact applications (e.g. printed packaging materials) where taint and odour issues are important. There are a range of sample preparation and injection techniques to deal with a vast range of samples including, for example, headspace sampling where a solid can be incubated for a period of time and then the vapours from above the solid are transferred into the GC capillary. 

Automation in HPLC is already at a high level. Sample preparation is still a major issue and there is a considerable demand to catch up with the backlog. Sample preparation and injection co-develop into one step in the analysis, often automated as well. 

Flow injection analysis (FIA) was first introduced by Ruzicka and Hansen in 1975. FIA is a technique for the manipulation of the sample and reagent streams in instrumental analysis. The purpose of flow injection is to have sample preparation and injection take place automatically in a closed system. The flow injection technique combines the principles of flow and batch type processing and it consists of a set of components which can be used in various combinations. 

Advances in the development of equipment (better control of temperature and better injection systems) and the use of an internal standard to correct errors owing to sample preparation and injection have reduced the impact of injection variation on the final precision of the method. 

Sample Preparation and Injection. Most cereal proteins are rich in glutamine and are subject to deamidation in acidic solvents. It is thus best to minimize exposure to acidic solvents, including ones containing TFA [21]. Similarly, alkaline extraction should be avoided because of potential peptide bond hydrolysis. As noted earlier, high temperature may also dissociate polypeptides. Most extracts are, however, quite stable [18-19,21]. 

In general, the proper approach to the generation of results of high accuracy is to optimise the equipment parameters and operational technique (sample preparation and injection) so that the true answer is... 

Precision The precision of a gas chromatographic analysis includes contributions from sampling, sample preparation, and the instrument. The relative standard deviation due to the gas chromatographic portion of the analysis is typically 1-5%, although it can be significantly higher. The principal limitations to precision are detector noise and the reproducibility of injection volumes. In quantitative work, the use of an internal standard compensates for any variability in injection volumes. 

Table 3.46 compares SPME and SPE. Although SPME has in common with SPE that the analytes are concentrated by adsorption into a solid phase, SPE involves absorbing the analyte from the sample onto a modified solid support. In practice, the two techniques are quite different. SPME differs from conventional SPE in that SPE isolates the majority of the analyte from a sample (>90%) but injects only about 1 to 2% of the sample onto the GC. SPME isolates a much smaller quantity of analyte (2-20%), but that entire sample is injected into the GC. SPME is easy-to-perform and often significantly more rapid and simpler than SPE, but its quantitative aspect is exacting. Both conventional SPE and SPME minimise the use of solvents for sample preparation and free analysts from tedious sample clean-up. Where SPE can replace LLE... 

Major advantages of LVI methods are higher sensitivity (compare the 100-1000 iL volume in LVI to the maximum injection volume of about 1 iL in conventional splitless or on-column injection), elimination of sample preparation steps (such as solvent evaporation) and use in hyphenated techniques (e.g. SPE-GC, LC-GC, GC-MS), which gives opportunities for greater automation, faster sample throughput, better data quality, improved quantitation, lower cost per analysis and fewer samples re-analysed. At-column is a very good reference technique for rapid LVI. Characteristics of LVI methods are summarised in Tables 4.19 and 4.20. Han-kemeier [100] has discussed automated sample preparation and LVI for GC with spectrometric detection. 

Principles and Characteristics Extraction or dissolution methods are usually followed by a separation technique prior to subsequent analysis or detection. While coupling of a sample preparation and a chromatographic separation technique is well established (Section 7.1), hyphenation to spectroscopic analysis is more novel and limited. By elimination of the chromatographic column from the sequence precol-umn-column-postcolumn, essentially a chemical sensor remains which ensures short total analysis times (1-2 min). Examples are headspace analysis via a sampling valve or direct injection of vapours into a mass spectrometer (TD-MS see also Section 6.4). In... 

Direct injections using RAM or TFC have simplified sample preparation and increased throughput. Matrix ion suppression was greatly reduced or eliminated in several cases compared with traditional off-line sample cleanup procedures such as PPT, SPE, and LLE. Method development time was minimized with generic methods15 that suit most applications. Detailed applications can be found in a recent review.8... 

Since the HPLC-MS cycle time (the chromatographic run time plus the autosampler injection time) is usually governed by the chromatographic system, focus has been given to sample preparation and chromatographic techniques. 

Lester et al. [24] have described a robotic system for the analysis of arsenic and selenium in human urine samples which demonstrates how robotics has been used to integrate sample preparations and instrument analysis of a biological matrix for trace elements. The robot is used to control the ashing, digestion, sample injection and operation of a hydride system and atomic absorption instrument, including the instrument calibration. The system, which routinely analyses both As and Se at ppb levels, is estimated to require only... 

First, a 50 ml solution was prepared of the sample V without (V-0) and with (V-A) antioxidants. The solution was poured into 12 sampling bottles and injected immediately and then every 2 hrs for 72 hrs. The variation of Mj s with time for these samples is shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. 

Inject the diluted sample solution into the HPLC system. Replicates of the sample preparation and of the injection of the sample in HPLC may be carried out sample preparation procedures are more likely to give rise to imprecision than instrumental variation. 

The study of the precision of a method is often the most time and resource consuming part of a method validation program, particularly for methods that are developed for multiple users. The precision is a measure of the random bias of the method. It has contributions fi om the repeatability of various steps in the analytical method, such as sample preparation and sample injection for HPLC [5-9], and from reproducibility of the whole analytical method fiom analyst to analyst, fiom instrument to instrument and fiom laboratory to laboratory. As a reproducibility study requires a large commitment of time and resources it is reasonable to ensure the overall ruggedness of the method before it is embarked upon. 

HPLC Separations. SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR INJECTION. Isolated residue organics were dissolved in water/acetonitrile solvent mixtures for reverse-phase HPLC separations as follows sample was dissolved in a minimum volume of acetonitrile and diluted with water until... 

---