Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simulation Case

Hydrogen produced from the decomposition of anunonia (600 °C) can be often used for feeding alkaline fuel cells, particularly suited for portable power applications. The performance of this reaction was developed by Ganley et al. [79] over a proper MSR configuration (Ru supported on aluminum-anodized alumina microchannels) resulting in a H2 production equivalent to 60W with an ammonia conversion of 99%, all in a volume of 0.35 cm, which exceeded the specifications for practical use laid out until that moment. [Pg.785]

Performance of this reaction in MSRs has been reported to be stable under reverse flow for a wide range of reaction parameters [80]. Kurungot et al. [81] proved that partial oxidation of methane (POM) (in a silica membrane-corundum reactor coated with Rh/y-alumina) at 525 °C exceeds the equilibrium conversion by 37%, which corresponds to a separation fector of 31. [Pg.785]

Regarding the potential commercial use of millistructured reactors, one of the main aspects to be considered is its possible integration in industrial processes. In this context, not only the design of the reactor but also the way in which it interacts with the different equipment linked to it in terms of mass and heat balances should be taken into account. For the latter purpose, process simulation software such as Aspen HYSYS, Aspen Plus, PROMAX, UNISIM, and/or [Pg.785]

VMGSim appear to be essential tools for evaluating the industrial feasibility of promising catalysts and reactors. [Pg.786]

Stream Products To WGS HTS-out Null Methane Water WTOMIX To heater Feed To LTS LTS-out [Pg.788]


In a normal molecular dynamics simulation with repeating boundary conditions (i.e., periodic boundary condition), the volume is held fixed, whereas at constant pressure the volume of the system must fluemate. In some simulation cases, such as simulations dealing with membranes, it is more advantageous to use the constant-pressure MD than the regular MD. Various schemes for prescribing the pressure of a molecular dynamics simulation have also been proposed and applied [23,24,28,29]. In all of these approaches it is inevitable that the system box must change its volume. [Pg.60]

Time available It takes some time to set up a simulation case. After a basic configuration has run successfully, it is easy and quick to do additional computer simulations with different boundary conditions. Experiments, on the other hand, are generally time-consuming. [Pg.1028]

This chapter presents a regulatory overview of on-site remediation, remedial investigations (RI), feasibility studies (FS), remedial technologies, and a simulated case study. The discussion of remedial investigations and feasibility studies also includes the development and selection of remedial technologies. The case study outlines a remedial investigation and feasibility study, as well as the selection of remedial technologies. [Pg.590]

Walton RT et al. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. Br Med J 1997 315(7111) 791—795. [Pg.460]

Fig. 20. Ratio of the interclass to intraclass variance as a function of zenith and azimuthal angles in a simulated case with 3 variables and 3 categories... Fig. 20. Ratio of the interclass to intraclass variance as a function of zenith and azimuthal angles in a simulated case with 3 variables and 3 categories...
In this section, the proposed approach has been tested in a simulation case study, developed in the MATLAB/SIMULINK environment. In detail, the problem of temperature control of the phenol-formaldehyde reactive system, developed in Sect. 2.4, has been considered. [Pg.108]

Subsequently, we considered the control implications of our findings, and showed that control objectives related to the energy dynamics of the individual units (e.g., temperature control) should typically be addressed in the fast time scale. On the other hand, control objectives related to the energy dynamic at the process level (such as managing energy use) should be addressed in the slow time scale. These concepts were illustrated through several examples and a simulation case study. [Pg.176]

There are simulation cases (for example using unequal intervals) where it is desirable to use a two-point approximation for G, both for the evaluation of a current, and as part of the boundary conditions. In that case, an improvement over the normally first-order two-point approximation is welcomed, and Hermitian formulae can achieve this. Two cases of such schemes are now described that of controlled current and that of an irreversible reaction, as described in Chap. 6, Sect. 6.2.2, using the single-species case treated in that section, for simplicity. The reader will be able to extend the treatment to more species and other cases, perhaps with the help of Bieniasz seminal work on this subject [108]. Both the 2(2) and 2(3) forms are given. It is assumed that we have arrived at the reduced didiagonal system (6.3) and have done the u-v calculation (here, only v and iq are needed). [Pg.162]

We first consider the intermolecular modes of liquid CS2. One of the details that two-dimensional Raman spectroscopy has the potential to reveal is the coupling between intermolecular motions on different time scales. We start with the one-dimensional Raman spectrum. The best linear spectra are based on time domain third-order Raman data, and these spectra demonstrate the existence of three dynamic time scales in the intermolecular response. In Fig. 3 we have modeled the one-dimensional time domain spectrum of CS2 for 3 cases (A) a single mode represented by the sum of three Brownian oscillators, (B) three Brownian oscillators, and (C) a distribution of 20 arbitrary Brownian oscillators. Case (A) represents the fully coupled, or isotropic case where the liquid is completely homogeneous on the time scales of the simulation. Case (B) deconvolutes the linear response into the three time scales that are directly evident in the measured response and is in the limit that the motions associated with each of the three timescales are uncoupled. Case (C) is an example where the liquid is represented by a large distribution of uncoupled motions. [Pg.462]

Figures 3.52-3.54 show three cases of simulation of the process where the diffusion coefficients for the support and membrane take, respectively, the following values Di = D3 = Dgp = 10 m /s 02 = 04 = Of b = 10 m /s. All simulated cases keep the total volume of the membrane assembly constant but differ from each other due to parameter 1/L which takes the values 10,100, and 1000. Figures 3.52-3.54 show three cases of simulation of the process where the diffusion coefficients for the support and membrane take, respectively, the following values Di = D3 = Dgp = 10 m /s 02 = 04 = Of b = 10 m /s. All simulated cases keep the total volume of the membrane assembly constant but differ from each other due to parameter 1/L which takes the values 10,100, and 1000.
For axiaUy symmetric molecules, the calculated shape of the AMs = 1 lines are given in Figure 1.8. The separation of the outer lines is 2D (where D = D/g(if) while that of the irmer lines is D (E is zero in this case). The theoretical Une shape for a randomly oriented triplet with E 0 is also shown in Figure 1.8. The separation of the outermost lines is again 2D whereas that of the intermediate and inner pairs is D + 31 /2 and D — 31 /2 respectively. As the zero-field interactions become comparable to and larger than the microwave energy, the Une shape exhibits severe distortions from the simulated case in Figure 1.8. [Pg.18]

Atkinson AJ Jr. Gentamicin kinetics A simulation case study. In Foster DM, Atkinson AJ Jr. Principles of pharmacokinetic data analysis Modeling and simulation (workshop manual). Seattle SAAM Institute, Inc. 2004. [Pg.221]

First, we set three simulation cases where we vary CO-j emission constraints. Next, we conduct simulation analyses using the model and the data. [Pg.971]

In the case of 44 % moisture there is liquid water present in the structure and also the permeability of liquid influences the conversion time of the sample. Figure 6 shows the measured temperature profiles of Figure 1 and the two simulated Cases 6 and 7 in Table 1, simulated for liquid axial permeabilities of 10 and 10 respectively. In both cases the radial permeability is assumed to be 10 lower. It is seen from Figure 6 that the intrinsic permeability of liquid has a large influence on the pyrolysis time. A higher permeability leads to a larger transport of water through the wood and less water evaporates inside the sample, which reduces the time of conversion. [Pg.1054]

The proposed strategies for stabilization of gas-lifted oil wells are offline methods which are unable to track online dynamic changes of the system. However, system parameters such as flow rate of injected gas and also noise characteristic are not constant with respect to time. An adaptive Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) approach is presented in this paper in which the state estimation is performed using an Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter (AUKF) to deal with unknown time-varying noise statistics. State-feedback gain is adaptively calculated based on Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Finally, the proposed control scheme is evaluated on a simulation case study. [Pg.381]

In the simulated case with S, equal to 0.7, Pu/iOo is 2.1, which is consistent with the experimental data of Wang et al. (2001c). However, in the case with... [Pg.98]

The information from these simulation cases is that surfactant adsorption cannot be correlated to the oil recovery factor. Figures 8.11 and 8.12 show the published experimental data on surfactant retention. The data in Figure 8.11 are from Gupta and Trushenski (1979), and the data in Figure 8.12 are from Glover et al. (1979). These figures also show that the recovery factor could uot be correlated with surfactant adsorption (retention). [Pg.353]

Polymer can be placed in a mixed SP slug or in a polymer-only slug for mobility control. Table 9.1 compares the results from different schemes. In SIM 1, 0.25 PV 0.07 wt.% polymer is injected after the surfactant slug (0.1 PV 2% S). In SIM 2, 0.1 PV X 0.07% polymer is moved to the surfactant slug. In SIM 3, all the polymer in 0.25 PV, 0.07 % polymer slug (0.25 x 0.0007 = 0.000175 PV) is placed in the 0.1 PV surfactant slug. Then the polymer concentration in the 0.1 PV surfactant slug is 0.175%. The recovery factors and incremental recovery factors are almost the same in these three simulation cases. From these simulation cases, it seems that it does not matter where polymer is placed. [Pg.379]


See other pages where Simulation Case is mentioned: [Pg.161]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.971]    [Pg.1052]    [Pg.1053]    [Pg.1056]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.1339]    [Pg.43]   


SEARCH



A simulation case study—the Brent Sands

Base case design process simulation

Base case design simulation)

Case study Monte Carlo simulation

EMTP Simulation Test Cases

Simulation case study

Simulation of Water Gas Shift Reactor An Industrial Case

© 2024 chempedia.info