Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sensitizer concentrations

The observations that the pss depends upon the sensitizer concentration (for low-energy sensitizers Et < S3 kcal/mole) and that added azulene (Ef = 30 kcal/mole) alters the [Cy [T], ratio so that the pss contains more fra/w-stilbene requires the addition of the following reactions ... [Pg.193]

Proteins contain a variety of functional groups and interact with the stationary phase at a number of simultaneous sites on the protein molecule, each more or less affected by change in eluent, or mobile-phase, pH or ionic strength. The equilibrium constant for the dissociation of the adsorption complex thus contains a product of many eluent-sensitive concentration terms, and the equilibrium position is very sensitive to elution conditions. Under the elution conditions, some proteins in a mixture may be tightly bound by the stationary phase (t), oo) while others are unretained (t R 0). Differential migration (Section 19.2.1) is replaced by extreme retention values. [Pg.1094]

The only drawback to NMR is its low sensitivity. Concentrations in the millimolar range are sometimes required, although with computer enhancement techniques (such as Fourier transform) signals at 10 -10 M concentrations can be detected. This is especially important for nuclei that have a low natural abundance, such as (1.1%) or deuterium, (0.015%). [Pg.59]

In a study of the photoisomerization of 4,4-dimethyl-2-cyclohexenone (8) to 6,6-dimethylbicyclo[3.1.0]-hexane-2-one (9) and 3-isopropyl-2-cyclo-pentenone (10), Chapman and Wampfler48 accounted for the pronounced effect of sensitizer concentration by such a self-quenching mechanism. The phenomenon was exhibited by four ketones with () lowest triplet states but not by benzophenone or acetophenone which have (w, n) triplet states.49... [Pg.253]

Equation (10) allows one to calculate a by determining the quantum yield of reaction as a function of sensitizer concentration. However, it should also be remembered that if the substrate absorbs part of the light, m may need to be corrected for changes in the amount of light absorbed by the sensitizer. [Pg.254]

One further complication should be noted as well namely, a sensitizer that contains a quenching impurity will display identical kinetics, since the impurity concentration will be proportional to the sensitizer concentration. [Pg.255]

Photoaddition reactions can destroy the original sensitizer, form a new sensitizer, or form a substance that quenches the desired reaction completely. Since substrate would also be consumed, its measured rate of disappearance will be anomalously high and that of product appearance too low. The importance of ensuring that the sensitizer acts as a true catalyst in a photo-reaction is demonstrated by a study88 in which 1,2-benzanthracene (13) was used to sensitize the dimerization of cyclohexadiene. The quantum yield of dimer formation was found to decrease at higher sensitizer concentration ... [Pg.257]

When the rate constants are such that the last term in Eq. (15) is not negligible, determination of the quantum yield of reaction as a function of sensitizer concentration will reveal back transfer this experiment also tests for sensitizer self-quenching (Section III.B). In the most frequently encountered case, forward transfer is much faster than back transfer (i.e., ke k.e) so that this term is small. The dependence of m on sensitizer concentration disappears and Eq. (15) reduces to the usual expression for quantum yield as a function of [A]. [Pg.260]

The sensitizer concentration dependence is lost and back transfer becomes unimportant when product formation from the excited acceptor (kr) is much faster than decay of the triplet sensitizer to its ground state (kd). As an extreme example, an acceptor which dissociates on the first vibration after... [Pg.260]

In general, fewer complications are observed with (ir, ir) triplet state ketones than with either (ir, /i) ketones, quinones, or aromatic hydrocarbons. The only serious problem observed to date with these compounds is selfquenching, which, however, is readily revealed by the effect of sensitizer concentration of quantum yield. [Pg.296]

Experimental SEC conditions require highly sensitive concentration detectors giving a detector response, which is linearly related to polymer concentration. The most common detector for monitoring polymer concentration in the eluent is the differential refractometer (DRI). The response of the detector to polymer concentration does not depend on polymer molecular weight except for very low polymers. [Pg.144]

For the oxygen adsorption proceeding with time as shown in Fig. 7 the sensitizer concentration [SQ] at time zero is associated with the initial lifetime T = T, and it follows that... [Pg.170]

Nitro compounds may add to carbon-centered radicals and thus also with the majority of the DNA radicals (Chap. 6.3 only the very strongly reducing radicals such as eaq and C02 reduce the nitro sensitizers to (unstable) hydroxyl-amines McClelland et al. 1984). Originally, the nitro compounds and 02 have just been taken as oxidants irrespective of their mode of action, especially as the efficiency of the sensitizers correlates with their reduction potential (Adams and Cooke 1969 Tallentire et al. 1972 Simic and Powers 1974 Adams et al. 1976a, 1981). This concept is expressed in relationship (88), where C is the sensitizer concentration required to achieve a constant sensitizing response (e.g. an enhancement ratio of 1.6) and E7 the one-electron reduction potential of the sensitizer at pH 7. [Pg.441]

Fig. 3 presents the experimental CO yield versus time for the same 3 pellet lengths. Two peaks also occur for CH, and H O (22). The gas species yield variations with pellet length are similar to those for CO. The initial experimental maximum is less distinct in the experiment than in model predictions owing to the requisite time between 2 successive GC samples. Fig. 4 shows product distribution as a function of time resulting from devolatilization of the 1.5 cm pellet (the larger pellet gives greater sensitivity concentration measurements). Water-free tar is the major product and its production increases with particle size. [Pg.466]

TABLE 1. Effect of sensitizer concentration on the molecular weight of polybutyl acrylate using 0.0349M A-methyldiethanolamine as the photoinitiator. [Pg.605]

Where the other absorber(s) react and influence the degradation of the drug, for example, an impurity or additive which sensitizes the photoreaction, the overall kinetics will be a combination of both pathways. Thus, the reaction rate may depend on both the drug and the sensitizer concentrations. As a consequence of such considerations, the photochemical stability of a drug in a formulation is not necessarily predictable only from its absorption spectrum and stability studies in a pure solvent. The final form of the drug in the formulation should also be considered. [Pg.211]

A perfect photosensitizer will not be transformed in the photosensitizing process, although in reality, some degradation of the photosensitizer will occur in time. Nonetheless, the rate of the photosensitized reaction will depend directly on the sensitizer concentration at low values where not all of the relevant incident radiation is being absorbed. Most studies of this type of photoreaction use a high concentration of the acceptor A, in which case the transformation of A will follow apparent zero-order kinetics. [Pg.212]

A sensitizer concentration of 5 x 10 mol g , at which a monolayer of the sensitizer molecules on the external surface of the niobate would be formed, was found to be ideal for efficient photocatalysis. At higher concentrations, the activity diminished. Also, an initial Pt loading of 0.05 wt. /) and a reduction temperature [for reducing Pt(NH3)4 + to Pt] of 450 °C were found to be optimum for this system. [Pg.2875]

Sensitizer Concentrations. The ABP concentrations were measured using the infrared I670 cm l band (benzophenone carbcmyl). Both a Beckman mfracord and a Beckman IR12 were employed. Q3ie extinction coefficient (base 10) was determined from model compound mixture studies and found to be 0.0341 (mll-wt... [Pg.78]

The Gyna-ir Correlation can be sharpened by the two-phase argument. With the crosslinking agents confined to their own phase, the quantity of gel should be determined by the total surface area of that phase and, hence, the dispersion of the E/ABP in the polyethylene matrix. If we assume that better blending is achieved by matching the component melt viscosities, then Qninv should be dependent on the sensitizer melt index (MI), the relative volumes of the components -blend ratio, BR - and the total sensitizer concentration (Co). From least squares analyses of our results, we find ... [Pg.85]

Ammonia has an odor threshold ranging from 1 to 5 ppm. Exposures between 20 and 25 ppm can cause complaints and discomfort in some workers unaccustomed to ammonia exposure but have little effect on pulmonary function or odor sensitivity. Concentrations of 100 ppm caused definite irritation of the respiratory tract and eyes, and exposures at 250 ppm ammonia are bearable for 30-60 min. Severe irritation of the respiratory tract, skin, and eyes has been observed following ammonia exposures ranging from 400 to 700 ppm. Exposure to 2500-4500 ppm ammonia can be fatal within 30 min. Immediate fatalities appear to be the result of airway obstruction, particularly laryngeal edema and glottic spasm, while infections and other secondary complications appear to be the cause of fatality among those who survive for several days to weeks. [Pg.102]

Since the TCD Is a flow sensitive (concentration) detector, the low flow rates generally associated with capillary systems should enhance the observed response of a low volume (30) TCD. The observed response, l.e. peak height, or peak area, is Inversely proportional to the gas flow rate at the detector (assuming the same carrier gas flow rate through the column, with any additional gas being Introduced as a make-up flow just prior to the detector). Optimum detector response should be obtained at those flow rates Just sufficient to efficiently sweep-out the dead volumes associated with the detector and connecting tubing. [Pg.60]

In the rice test with both cultivars, a linear correlation was obtained between 5 x 10-3 and 5 x 10 5 ig/ml for BL and CS. The induced angles leveled off at higher concentrations. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) was tested and was found to produce only a weak effect, five orders of magnitude less than BL. Cytokinins were inactive and actually counteracted the effect of BL. Abscisic acid (ABA) also counteracted the effect of BL. This assay is thus highly specific for BRs and is also the most sensitive, concentrations as low as 0.05 ng/ml of BL being readily detected. [Pg.113]


See other pages where Sensitizer concentrations is mentioned: [Pg.156]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.2860]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.92]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.78 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.78 ]




SEARCH



Applications of local concentration sensitivities

Cellular substrate concentration, enzymes sensitivity

Concentration sensitivity

Concentration sensitivity, trace analysis

Concentration, sensitivity sensitive detector

Concentration-sensitive detectors

Detection concentration sensitivity

Detector, atomic spectrometer concentration sensitivity

High concentration-sensitive

Increase of sensitivity pre-concentration techniques

Sensitivity or the Minimum Detectable Concentration

Sensitivity sensitizer concentration effects

Sensitivity to concentration

Sensitivity, concentration detector

Sensitivity, concentration enhancement

Sensitivity, concentration optimum choice

Sensitivity, concentration pressure

Sensitivity, concentration temperature

The Concentration Sensitivity of a Chromatographic System

Vapor concentration, detection sensitivity

© 2024 chempedia.info