Detection concentration sensitivity

The major problems in assay of protein by CE are the low efficiency and reproducibility by presents of protein adsorption on the inner surface of a capillary, and poor concentration sensitivity UV-detection. 

The method of stripping voltammetry (SV) is one of the most perspective methods in concentration range of thallium(I) determination of 10 -10 M. Achievement of high sensitivity of thallium(I) determination needs carrying out its additional concentration and sepai ation from other metals which ai e close by electrochemical properties. For these purposes it is offered to use a method of coprecipitation with collector. The combination of SV and a method of coprecipitation on a collector have shown that minimum detectable concentration can be decreased by 2-3 orders of magnitude. 

To unambiguously identify the presence of a peak and, in addition, be able to give some proximate estimation of its size for quantitative purposes, the peak height needs to be at least 5 times the noise level. The detector sensitivity, or the minimum detectable concentration, (Xd), is defined as that concentration of solute that will give a signal equivalent to twice the noise level and, consequently, the concentration of solute at the limiting (k ) value must be 2.5Xd. 

Equation (33) shows that the maximum capacity ratio of the last eluted solute is inversely proportional to the detector sensitivity or minimum detectable concentration. Consequently, it is the detector sensitivity that determines the maximum peak capacity attainable from the column. Using equation (33), the peak capacity was calculated for three different detector sensitivities for a column having an efficiency of 10,000 theoretical plates, a dead volume of 6.7 ml and a sample concentration of l%v/v. The results are shown in Table 1, and it is seen that the limiting peak capacity is fairly large. 

It is instructive to compare the sensitivity which may be achieved by absorption and fluorescence methods. The overall precision with which absorbance can be measured is certainly not better than 0.001 units using a 1 cm cell. Since for most molecules the value of emax is rarely greater than 105, then on the basis of the Beer-Lambert Law the minimum detectable concentration is given by cmin> 10 3/105= 10 8M. 

Detector Sensitivity, or Minimum Detectable Concentration Pressure Sensitivity Flow Sensitivity Temperature Sensitivity... 

Detector Sensitivity or the Minimum Detectable Concentration has been defined as the minimum concentration of an eluted solute that can be differentiated unambiguously from the noise. The ratio of the signal to the noise for a peak that is considered decisively identifiable has been arbitrarily chosen to be two. This ratio originated from electronic theory and has been transposed to LC. Nevertheless, the ratio is realistic and any peak having a signal to noise ratio of less than two is seriously obscured by the noise. Thus, the minimum detectable concentration is that concentration that provides a signal equivalent to twice the noise level. Unfortunately, the concentration that will provide a signal equivalent to twice the noise level will usually depend on the physical properties of the solute used for measurement. Consequently, the detector sensitivity, or minimum detectable concentration, must be quoted in conjunction with the solute that is used for measurement. 

The flow sensitivity of a detector will also be one of the factors that determines the long term noise and thus will influence the sensitivity or minimum detectable concentration of the detector.lt is usually measured as the change in detector output for unit change in flow rate through the sensor cell. Again, the refractive index detector is the most sensitive to flow rate changes. 

The term sensitivity is often used in place of the limit of detection . The sensitivity actually refers to the degree of response obtained from a detector, i.e. the increase in output signal obtained from an increasing amount or concentration of analyte reaching the detector. Care must therefore be taken when these terms are being used or when they are encountered to ensure that their meanings are unambiguous. 

Where Q, is the minimum detectable amount, R the detector noise level and s the detector sensitivity [135,146,151,152]. For a concentration sensitive detector the minimum detectable concentration is the product of Q, and the volumetric gas flow rate through the detector. The minimum detectable amount or concentration is proportional to the retention time, and therefore, directly proportional to the column radius for large values of n. it follows, then, that very small quantities can be detected on narrow-bore columns. 

Detection is also frequently a key issue in polymer analysis, so much so that a section below is devoted to detectors. Only two detectors, the ultra-violet-visible spectrophotometer (UV-VIS) and the differential refractive index (DRI), are commonly in use as concentration-sensitive detectors in GPC. Many of the common polymer solvents absorb in the UV, so UV detection is the exception rather than the rule. Refractive index detectors have improved markedly in the last decade, but the limit of detection remains a common problem. Also, it is quite common that one component may have a positive RI response, while a second has a zero or negative response. This can be particularly problematic in co-polymer analysis. Although such problems can often be solved by changing or blending solvents, a third detector, the evaporative light-scattering detector, has found some favor. 

The detection of the migrating sample boundary in CE can be accomplished by UV, fluorescent, electrochemical, radiochemical, conductivity, and mass spectrometry (MS) means. The use of high-sensitivity detection systems is always a key issue in CE applications. The sensitivity of HPCE detectors may be at least 2 to 3 orders of magnitude better than that of HPLC detectors. Since the detection cell volume is very small, the concentration sensitivity... 

Concentration sensitive detection (microbore LC for best sensitivity)... 

Fujiwara et al. [94] found that, when present as a heteropolyacid complex, molybdenum(VI), germanium(IV), and silicon(IV) produced CL emission from the oxidation of luminol, and similar CL oxidation of luminol was observed for arsenic(V) and phosphorus(V) but with the addition of the metavanadate ion to the acid solution of molybdate. A hyphenated method was therefore proposed for the sensitive determination of arsenate, germanate, phosphate, and silicate, after separation by ion chromatography. The minimum detectable concentrations of arsenic(V), germanium(IV), phosphate, and silicon(IV) were 10, 50, 1, and 10... 

---