Secondary trace analysis

Although XRF is generally the X-ray spectrometry method of choice for analysis of major and trace elements in bulk specimens, useful PIXE measurements can be made. A detailed review of the main considerations for thick-target PEXE provides guidance for trace analysis with known and unknown matrices and bulk analysis when the constituents are unknown. Campbell and Cookson also discuss the increased importance of secondary fluorescence and geometrical accuracy for bulk measurements. 

Chloro-7-nitrobenz-2,l,3-oxadiazole (NBD-C1) reacts with primary and secondary aliphatic amines to produce intensely fluorescent derivatives. Although anilines, phenols and thiols react with NBD-C1, they produce derivatives which do not fluoresce or which are only weakly fluorescent. This limits the types of compounds which can be analyzed with this reagent and thus makes the technique more selective. This selectivity is desirable in trace analysis because of a lower degree of interference from co-extractives. The general reaction scheme for formation of the fluorescent amine derivatives is shown in Fig.4.50. 

To better understand the step-wise approach for method development and validation, it is necessary to give examples. They are taken from organic and inorganic trace analysis of environmental matrices. Figure 2.2 illustrates the steps for the validation of the analytical procedure for the determination of polychlorobiphenyls (PCB) in industrially contaminated soil. Figure 2.3 shows the steps necessary to validate the determination of trace elements and particularly arsenic in a fish tissue. Each step of the procedure will provide the necessary information so that the next step can be done with confidence. In practice, the analyst will develop a procedure to quantify all primary and secondary method characteristics as defined in section 2.1.4. 

When structural alignments do not reveal structural similarities that allow annotation transfer, other approaches can be used to obtain information about the function of the target protein. The analysis of the conservation of 3D patterns of functionally relevant residues and evolutionary trace analysis (described in section 2.3.3) are examples of these methodologies. Structural patterns consist of coordinate files in PDB format containing the spatial positions of functionally important residues without considering their positions on the primary or secondary structure. In fact, these patterns can correspond to functional sites present in proteins with completely different folds. The program PINTS (Patterns In Non-homologous Tertiary Structures)... 

Most primary and secondary amines exhibit poor chromatographic performance via direct HPLC approaches, making quantitative trace analysis difficult. Chemical derivatization in solution has long been accepted as an effective modification technique in HPLC, improving the overall specificity, chromatographic performance, and sensitivity for trace analysis. " ... 

Mass spectrometry is one of the most powerful multielemental determination methods, allowing the estimation of non-pollution levels in a multielement run. In field-desorption MS, 10 pg Tl could be detected in 2, L of non-ashed sample solution (homogenized rat brain) by means of an isotope dilution technique (Schulten et al., 1978), offering possibilities of microlocal trace analysis. Ionization of CHCI3 extracts from plant cytosols with Ar" (secondary ion MS) enabled the detection of dimethylthallium-t- directly in the mass spectrum (Gunther and Umland, 1989). 

In mass spectrometric studies, WT have been applied mainly in two areas including secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and instrumentation design. SIMS is a type of surface technique for trace analysis, determination of elemental composition, and the identity and concentrations of adsorbed species and elemental composition as a function of depth [46]. The application of wavelet denoising techniques to SIMS images has been studied by Grasserbauer et al. [47-50], and details about these studies are presented in another chapter of this book. 

The rapid development of mass spectrometric technology and the wide field of applications exclude a complete and comprehensive discussion of mass spectrometric possibilities for trace analysis of metals. Therefore, this report will give a brief outline of the principles of mass spectrometry (MS) and the fundamentals of qualitative and quantitative mass spectrometric analysis with emphasis on recent developments and results. The classical methods of analysis of solids, i.e. spark-source MS and thermal ionization MS, as well as newer methods of metal analysis are described. Focal points in this survey of recently developed techniques include secondary ion MS , laser probe MS , plasma ion source MS gas discharge MS and field desorption MS . Here, a more detailed description is given and the merits of these emerging methods are discussed more explicitly. In particular, the results of the FD techniques in elemental analyses are reviewed and critically evaluated. 

Sputtered Neutral Mass Spectrometry (SNMS) is the mass spectrometric analysis of sputtered atoms ejected from a solid surface by energetic ion bombardment. The sputtered atoms are ionized for mass spectrometric analysis by a mechanism separate from the sputtering atomization. As such, SNMS is complementary to Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), which is the mass spectrometric analysis of sputtered ions, as distinct from sputtered atoms. The forte of SNMS analysis, compared to SIMS, is the accurate measurement of concentration depth profiles through chemically complex thin-film structures, including interfaces, with excellent depth resolution and to trace concentration levels. Genetically both SALI and GDMS are specific examples of SNMS. In this article we concentrate on post ionization only by electron impact. 

Figure 3.4 Two-dimensional separation of dimethylnaphthalenes in crude oil using a 50 m methyl (95%)/phenyl (5%) polysiloxane primary column and a 50 m methyl (50%)/phenyl (25%)/cyanopropyl (25%) polysiloxane secondary column. The top trace indicates the primary separation monitor, while the following chromatograms indicate individual heart-cut secondary analysis. Reproduced from R.G. Schafer and J. Holtkemerr, Anal. Chim. Acta. 1992, 260, 107 (20).

The detection and quantification of one or more of the above lipid peroxidation produas (primary and/or secondary) in appropriate biofluids and tissue samples serves to provide indices of lipid peroxidation both in ntro and in vivo. However, it must be stressed that it is absolutely essential to ensure that the products monitored do not arise artifactually, a very difiScult task since parameters such as the availability of catalytic trace metal ions and O2, temperature and exposure to light are all capable of promoting the oxidative deterioration of PUFAs. Indeed, one sensible precaution involves the treatment of samples for analysis with sufficient levels of a chainbreaking antioxidant [for example, butylated hydroxy-toluene (BHT)] immediately after collection to retard or prevent peroxidation occurring during periods of storage or preparation. 

Reaction detectors are a convenient means of performing online postcolumn derivatization in HPLC. The derivative reaction is performed after the separation of the sample by the column and prior to detection in a continuous reactor. The mobile phase flow is not interrupted during the analysis and reaction, although it may be augmented by the addition of a secondary solvent to aid the reaction or to conform to the requirements of the detector. Reaction detectors are finding increasing application for the analysis of trace components in complex matrices where both high detection sensitivity and selectivity are needed. Many suitable reaction techniques have been published for this purpose [641-650]. 

XRF nowadays provides accurate concentration data at major and low trace levels for nearly all the elements in a wide variety of materials. Hardware and software advances enable on-line application of the fundamental approach in either classical or influence coefficient algorithms for the correction of absorption and enhancement effects. Vendors software packages, such as QuantAS (ARL), SSQ (Siemens), X40, IQ+ and SuperQ (Philips), are precalibrated analytical programs, allowing semiquantitative to quantitative analysis for elements in any type of (unknown) material measured on a specific X-ray spectrometer without standards or specific calibrations. The basis is the fundamental parameter method for calculation of correction coefficients for matrix elements (inter-element influences) from fundamental physical values such as absorption and secondary fluorescence. UniQuant (ODS) calibrates instrumental sensitivity factors (k values) for 79 elements with a set of standards of the pure element. In this approach to inter-element effects, it is not necessary to determine a calibration curve for each element in a matrix. Calibration of k values with pure standards may still lead to systematic errors for unknown polymer samples. UniQuant provides semiquantitative XRF analysis [242]. 

Figure 5.21 shows the results of an analysis trace made across the primary lamellae/ secondary lamellae interface shown in Figure 5.20 as the line X-X. 

---