Sample dispersion from

The A, B, and C terms of Equation (3) symbolize contributions to sample dispersion from the interparticle flow structure A, axial diffusion B, and finite rate of equilibration of the solute between mobile and stationary phases C. The values of the coefficients A, B, and C are obtained from curve fitting of experimental data to Equation (3) for a sufficiently wide velocity range. For very good columns, A = 0.5, B = 2, and C - 0.005 (36). Independent of particle size and solute molecular weight, h reaches an optimal value of 2-3 for a well-packed column, when v is in the range of 3-5. For a given solute, the linear velocity at this optimum increases with decreasing particle size. For example,... 

When a sample is injected into the carrier stream it has the rectangular flow profile (of width w) shown in Figure 13.17a. As the sample is carried through the mixing and reaction zone, the width of the flow profile increases as the sample disperses into the carrier stream. Dispersion results from two processes convection due to the flow of the carrier stream and diffusion due to a concentration gradient between the sample and the carrier stream. Convection of the sample occurs by laminar flow, in which the linear velocity of the sample at the tube s walls is zero, while the sample at the center of the tube moves with a linear velocity twice that of the carrier stream. The result is the parabolic flow profile shown in Figure 13.7b. Convection is the primary means of dispersion in the first 100 ms following the sample s injection. 

The sum expressed by equation (21) lends itself to a digital calculation and can be employed in an appropriate computer program to calculate actual peak profiles. In doing so, however, as (v) is measured in plate volumes and sample volumes are usually given in milliliters, they must be converted to plate volumes to be used with equation (21). To demonstrate the effect of a finite charge and the use of equation (21), the peak profiles resulting from a sample dispersed over the twenty-one consecutive plates of a column are shown in Figure 16. 

Having established that a finite volume of sample causes peak dispersion and that it is highly desirable to limit that dispersion to a level that does not impair the performance of the column, the maximum sample volume that can be tolerated can be evaluated by employing the principle of the summation of variances. Let a volume (Vi) be injected onto a column. This sample volume (Vi) will be dispersed on the front of the column in the form of a rectangular distribution. The eluted peak will have an overall variance that consists of that produced by the column and other parts of the mobile phase conduit system plus that due to the dispersion from the finite sample volume. For convenience, the dispersion contributed by parts of the mobile phase system, other than the column (except for that from the finite sample volume), will be considered negligible. In most well-designed chromatographic systems, this will be true, particularly for well-packed GC and LC columns. However, for open tubular columns in GC, and possibly microbore columns in LC, where peak volumes can be extremely small, this may not necessarily be true, and other extra-column dispersion sources may need to be taken into account. It is now possible to apply the principle of the summation of variances to the effect of sample volume. 

It is seen that columns having diameters less than 2 mm will only tolerate a maximum sample volume of a fraction of a microliter. Although larger volume valves can be used to inject sample volumes of this size, the dispersion from the valve is still likely... 

To minimize the effect of sample volume on dispersion, and ensure that there was minimum dispersion from the valve and valve connections, a 0.2 pi Valeo internal... 

To determine the band dispersion that results from a significant, but moderate, sample volume overload the summation of variances can be used. However, when the sample volume becomes excessive, the band dispersion that results becomes equivalent to the sample volume itself. In figure 10, two solutes are depicted that are eluted from a column under conditions of no overload. If the dispersion from the excessive sample volume just allows the peaks to touch at the base, the peak separation in milliliters of mobile phase passed through the column will be equivalent to the sample volume (Vi) plus half the base width of both peaks. It is assumed in figure 10 that the efficiency of each peak is the same and in most cases this will be true. If there is some significant difference, an average value of the efficiencies of the two peaks can be taken. 

Where peak dispersion has not been constrained to very small volumes the external sample loop injector can be used and the external loop sample system, which employs six ports, is depicted in figure 15. In the external loop sample valve, three slots are cut in the rotor so that any adjacent pair of ports can be connected. In the loading position shown on the left, the mobile phase supply is connected by a rotor slot to port (4) and the column to port (5) thus allowing mobile phase to flow directly through the column. In this position the sample loop is connected to ports (3) and (6). Sample flows from a syringe into port (1) through the rotor slot to the sample loop at port (6). At the same... 

MgO-supported model Mo—Pd catalysts have been prepared from the bimetallic cluster [Mo2Pd2 /z3-CO)2(/r-CO)4(PPh3)2() -C2H )2 (Fig. 70) and monometallic precursors. Each supported sample was treated in H2 at various temperatures to form metallic palladium, and characterized by chemisorption of H2, CO, and O2, transmission electron microscopy, TPD of adsorbed CO, and EXAFS. The data showed that the presence of molybdenum in the bimetallic precursor helped to maintain the palladium in a highly dispersed form. In contrast, the sample prepared from the monometallie precursors was characterized by larger palladium particles and by weaker Mo—Pd interactions. ... 

In total, 550 analyses were conducted from samples taken at this site. These data indicate that only 5.8 percent of the 10.9 acres contaminated represented the road surfaces originally sprayed. The remaining surface contamination probably resulted from dispersion by wind, vehicular traffic, runoff, etc. The total TCDD sprayed was probably about 340 grams, with 74 percent still on the areas sprayed. Mean, volume weighted, TCDD concentrations in the sprayed and dispersed areas were 469 and 31 ppb, respectively. Concentrations in individual composite samples collected from sprayed areas ranged up to 1,800 ppb. About 90 percent of the TCDD was contained in 13 percent of the soil volume. 

As always in chemisorption measurements, pretreatment of the samples should be done with care. For metal catalysts prepared from oxides in particular this is experimentally troublesome because a reduction step is always needed in the preparation of the metal catalyst. Hydrogen or hydrogen diluted with an inert gas is usually used for the reduction but it is difficult to remove adsorbed H2 from the surface completely. So, after reduction the metal surfaces contains (unknown) amounts of H atoms, which are strongly retained by the surface and, as a consequence, it is not easy to find reliable values for the dispersion from H2 chemisorption data. 

The small peak volumes typical of samples eluted from small bore columns and short small diameter particle columns used in high-speed liquid chromatography place severe demands on the dispersion characteristics of all components of the liquid chromatograph. The standard deviation of a peak eluting from a column is given by... 

Fig. 1. An indicator mineral plume consisting of Cr-diopsides glacially dispersed from the Thompson Nickel Belt in Manitoba, Canada, detected in 20 litre till samples at a 30-km spacing (Thorleifson et al. 1994 Thorleifson Matile 1997). 

In matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) the sample is mixed with a suitable powdered solid-phase until a homogeneous dry, free flowing powder is obtained with the sample dispersed over the entire material. A wide variety of solid-phase materials can be used, but for the non-ionic surfactants usually a reversed-phase C18 type of sorbent is applied. The mixture is subsequently (usually dry) packed into a glass column. Next, the analytes of interest are eluted with a suitable solvent or solvent mixture. The competition between reversed-phase hydrophobic chains in the dispersed solid-phase and the solvents results in separation of lipids from analytes. Separation of analytes and interfering substances can also be achieved if polarity differences are present. The MSPD technique has been proven to be successful for a variety of matrices and a wide range of compounds [43], thanks to its sequential extraction matrices analysed include fish tissues [44,45] as well as other diverse materials [46,47]. 

A precision injection device is required to minimize sample dispersion and keep the sample volume and length of sample zone reproducible. This is normally a rotary valve similar to that used for injection in HPLC. Exact timing from sample injection to detection is critical because of rapidly occurring reactions which are monitored before they reach completion. This demands a constant flow rate with low amplitude pulsing, normally achieved by a peristaltic... 

For almost three decades, many Ti dispersion curves (including the first one shown in Fig. 1) were actually measured by moving the sample manually from one magnet to the other. Quite soon, however, mechanical devices (50-64) were developed to achieve the task, some of which were quite sophisticated. 

Figure 6 shows the size distributions for the samples taken from one of the runs, presented as the cumulative number oversize per ml of slurry. From the lateral shift of the size distributions, the growth rate can be determined. Figure 7 shows values of growth rate, G, supersaturation, s, and crystal content determined during the run. As a material balance check, the crystal contents were evaluated from direct measurements, from solution analyses and from the moments of the size distribution. The agreement was satisfactory. No evidence of size dependent growth or size dispersion was observed. 

Source-dispersion and receptor-oriented models have a common physical basis. Both assume that mass arriving at a receptor (sampling site) from source j was transported with conservation of mass by atmospheric dispersion of source emitted material. From the source-dispersion model point of view, the mass collected at the receptor from source j, Mj, Is the dependent variable which Is equal to the product of a dispersion factor, Dj (which depends on wind speed, wind direction, stability, etc.) and an emission rate factor, Ej, 1. e. , ... 

Band dispersion from sample mass overload is a direct result of the chromatographic process proceeding under conditions, where the adsorption isotherm of the solute on the stationary phase, is no longer linear. The development of an equation that describes the extent, of band spreadinn as a function of mass of sample placed on the column, is complex. This problem has been elegantly approached by 6uiochon and his co-workers (15-18) from the basis of the adsorption isotherm of the solute on the stationary phase. 

---