Dispersion from sample volume

This mode of flow analysis was proposed [128] as a means of easily and efficiently achieving extended sample handling times without excessive sample dispersion. The sample volume is inserted into an unsegmented carrier stream, and two air plugs are added at its ends in order to minimise sample broadening, and hence axial dispersion. The beneficial effects arising from the presence of air plugs at both ends of the sample bolus were already emphasised in 1972, in relation to a chemilumino-metric determination of low concentrations of Cr(III) [129]. 

The sum expressed by equation (21) lends itself to a digital calculation and can be employed in an appropriate computer program to calculate actual peak profiles. In doing so, however, as (v) is measured in plate volumes and sample volumes are usually given in milliliters, they must be converted to plate volumes to be used with equation (21). To demonstrate the effect of a finite charge and the use of equation (21), the peak profiles resulting from a sample dispersed over the twenty-one consecutive plates of a column are shown in Figure 16. 

Having established that a finite volume of sample causes peak dispersion and that it is highly desirable to limit that dispersion to a level that does not impair the performance of the column, the maximum sample volume that can be tolerated can be evaluated by employing the principle of the summation of variances. Let a volume (Vi) be injected onto a column. This sample volume (Vi) will be dispersed on the front of the column in the form of a rectangular distribution. The eluted peak will have an overall variance that consists of that produced by the column and other parts of the mobile phase conduit system plus that due to the dispersion from the finite sample volume. For convenience, the dispersion contributed by parts of the mobile phase system, other than the column (except for that from the finite sample volume), will be considered negligible. In most well-designed chromatographic systems, this will be true, particularly for well-packed GC and LC columns. However, for open tubular columns in GC, and possibly microbore columns in LC, where peak volumes can be extremely small, this may not necessarily be true, and other extra-column dispersion sources may need to be taken into account. It is now possible to apply the principle of the summation of variances to the effect of sample volume. 

The maximum allowable dispersion will include contributions from all the different dispersion sources. Furthermore, the analyst may frequently be required to place a large volume of sample on the column to accommodate the specific nature of the sample. The peak spreading resulting from the use of the maximum possible sample volume is likely to reach the permissible dispersion limit. It follows that the dispersion that takes place in the connecting tubes, sensor volume and other parts of the detector must be reduced to the absolute minimum and, if possible, kept to less than 10% of that permissible (i.c.,1 % of the column variance) to allow large sample volumes to be used when necessary. 

It is seen that columns having diameters less than 2 mm will only tolerate a maximum sample volume of a fraction of a microliter. Although larger volume valves can be used to inject sample volumes of this size, the dispersion from the valve is still likely... 

The sample volume of the internal loop valve is contained in the connecting slot of the valve rotor and can range in capacity from 0.1 pi to about 0.5 pi. The dispersion that... 

To minimize the effect of sample volume on dispersion, and ensure that there was minimum dispersion from the valve and valve connections, a 0.2 pi Valeo internal... 

In a packed column the HETP depends on the particle diameter and is not related to the column radius. As a result, an expression for the optimum particle diameter is independently derived, and then the column radius determined from the extracolumn dispersion. This is not true for the open tubular column, as the HETP is determined by the column radius. It follows that a converse procedure must be employed. Firstly the optimum column radius is determined and then the maximum extra-column dispersion that the column can tolerate calculated. Thus, with open tubular columns, the chromatographic system, in particular the detector dispersion and the maximum sample volume, is dictated by the column design which, in turn, is governed by the nature of the separation. 

Consider the separation depicted in Figure 1. It is assumed that the pair of solutes represent the elution of the solute of interest and its nearest neighbor. Now, when the sample volume becomes extreme, the dispersion that results from column overload, to the first approximation, becomes equivalent to the sample volume itself as the sample volume now contributes to the elution of the solutes. Thus, from Figure 1, the peak separation in milliliters of mobile phase will be equivalent to the volume of sample plus half the sum of the base widths of the respective peaks. 

Tirrell et al. [42,43] studied the role of interfacial chains in a more detailed fashion. Tirrell et al. [42,43] used a crosslinked PDMS cap in contact with a silicon wafer on to which a,o)-hydroxyl terminated PDMS chains are tethered by adsorption from a solution. The molecular weight of the narrow disperse PDMS samples was in the range of 20,000-700,000. The surface chain density was given by27 yj g e 0 is the volume fraction of PDMS in solution. 

To determine the band dispersion that results from a significant, but moderate, sample volume overload the summation of variances can be used. However, when the sample volume becomes excessive, the band dispersion that results becomes equivalent to the sample volume itself. In figure 10, two solutes are depicted that are eluted from a column under conditions of no overload. If the dispersion from the excessive sample volume just allows the peaks to touch at the base, the peak separation in milliliters of mobile phase passed through the column will be equivalent to the sample volume (Vi) plus half the base width of both peaks. It is assumed in figure 10 that the efficiency of each peak is the same and in most cases this will be true. If there is some significant difference, an average value of the efficiencies of the two peaks can be taken. 

In total, 550 analyses were conducted from samples taken at this site. These data indicate that only 5.8 percent of the 10.9 acres contaminated represented the road surfaces originally sprayed. The remaining surface contamination probably resulted from dispersion by wind, vehicular traffic, runoff, etc. The total TCDD sprayed was probably about 340 grams, with 74 percent still on the areas sprayed. Mean, volume weighted, TCDD concentrations in the sprayed and dispersed areas were 469 and 31 ppb, respectively. Concentrations in individual composite samples collected from sprayed areas ranged up to 1,800 ppb. About 90 percent of the TCDD was contained in 13 percent of the soil volume. 

A precision injection device is required to minimize sample dispersion and keep the sample volume and length of sample zone reproducible. This is normally a rotary valve similar to that used for injection in HPLC. Exact timing from sample injection to detection is critical because of rapidly occurring reactions which are monitored before they reach completion. This demands a constant flow rate with low amplitude pulsing, normally achieved by a peristaltic... 

Unfortunately, the magnitude of the variance contribution from each source will be different and the ultimate minimum size of each is often dictated by the limitations in the physical construction of of the different parts of the apparatus and consequently not controllable. It follows that equipartition of the permitted extra column dispersion is not possible. It will be seen later that the the maximum sample volume provides the maximum chromatographic mass and concentration sensitivity. Consequently, all other sources of dispersion must be kept to the absolute minimum to allow as large a sample volume as possible to be placed on the column without exceeding the permitted limit. At the same time it must be stressed, that all the permitted extra column dispersion can not be allotted solely to the sample volume. 

It is seen from equation (34) that for a fully optimized column the maximum sample volume depends solely on the extra column dispersion (oe) This again emphasizes the importance of not only using equipment with low extra column dispersion but, also, knowing the value of (oe) for the particular chromatograph being used. 

The polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres were obtained from Seragen Diagnostics. The nominal sizes of these standards were from electron microscopy measurements. The samples were prepared by diluting the 10% solids in filtered, doubly distilled water, adding a small amount of SDS to help disperse the samples and sonicating with Branson 60 watt bath sonicator for 30 seconds to disperse any aggregates. The relative volumes (weights) of the two sizes of PSL in the mixed sample were estimated to be accurate to about 5-10%. 

Sodium Oxide Disperse 500 mg of sample, accurately weighed, in 150 mL of water, and heat to ensure its dissolution. Add 2 to 3 drops of phenolphthalein TS and 100.0 mL of 0.1 N sulfuric acid. Titrate with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide until a permanent pink color first appears. Subtract the volume of 0.1 N sodium hydroxide from the volume of 0.1 N sulfuric acid. Each milliliter of 0.1 N sulfuric acid is equivalent to 3.099 mg of sodium oxide. 

---