Risk assessment subjectiveness

Recent developments take the risk assessment subject to a higher level within the practice of safety. By formalizing the hazard analysis and risk assessment process, a better appreciation of the significance of individual risks is achieved. As risks levels are categorized and prioritized, more intelligent decisions can be made with respect to their elimination or reduction. For the hazard analysis and risk assessment process, it is necessary to arrive at definitions of hazards, hazards analyses, risks, and risk assessments. 

The analysis of a risk—that is, its estimation—leads to the assessment of that risk and the decision-making processes of selecting the appropriate level of risk reduction. In most studies this is an iterative process of risk analysis and risk assessment until the risk is reduced to some specified level. The subjec t of acceptable or tolerable levels of risk that coiild be applied to decision making on risks is a complex subject which will not oe addressed in this section. 

It has been traditional to subject workers to higher risks than the public, (a) Write a short discussion of the equities of this practice with consideration for the fact the worker may leave employment that imposed a long term risk, (b) The Nevada Test Site has been selected as a possible location for a high level waste repository. For purposes of the risk assessment, the workers in the repository will be treated as workers with subsequent higher allowable risk. There are many other workers at NTS. Discuss whether these should be treated as workers or public, (c) If they are treated... 

The severe accident research program improved public risk assessment, reduced uncertainties, and the reliance on subjective expert opinion. To close two severe accident issues in NRC s Severe Accident Research Plan (NUREG-1365) Mark I Liner Attack and Direct Containment Heating (DCH) were addressed with a new approach using the Risk Oriented Accident Analysis Method (ROAAM) (Theofanous, 1994, 1989). The resolution of the Mark-I Liner Attack issue constitutes the first full demonstration of ROAAM. It emphasizes the determinism and provides a basis for synergistic collaboration among experts through a common communication frame. 

Risk is often defined as the likelihood of a certain event times a measure of the severity of its consequences. Most risk assessment studies concentrate on estimating the likelihood of certain events. They often concern the release of chemicals, or accidents in engineering projects and the project outcome. In thi.s section, the subject of accidents is not covered. Risk assessment (RA), as a technique, has been adopted by various national governments, by EU, and by OECD.-... 

In terms of the contents of Part 111, Cliapter 9 serves to introduce die general subject of healdi risk assessment (HRA). An expanded presentation on each of die four healdi risk assessment steps follows, as detailed below ... 

Chronic. Continuous exposure occurs over long periods of time, generally several mondis to years. Concentradons of inlialed (toxic) contaminants are usually reladvely low. This subject area falls in die general domain of healdi risk assessment (HRA) and it is diis subject tliat is addressed in die next five chapters. Thus, in contrast to the acute (short-term) exposures dial predominate in hazard risk assessments, cliroiiic (loiig-temi) exposures are the major concern in health risk assessments. 

The term risk assessment is not only used to describe the likelihood of an ad crse response to a chemical or physical agent, but it has also been used to describe the likelihood of any unwanted event. This subject is treated in more detail in tlie next Part. These include risks such as explosions or injuries in tlie workplace natural catastrophes injury or deatli due to various voluntary activities such as skiing, sky diving, flying, and bimgee Jumping diseases deatli due to natural causes and many others. ... 

This cliapter serves to introduce tlie general subject of hazard risk assessment and analysis, including cause-consequence risk evaluation. The cause-consequence aspect of this topic is perliaps tlie key to understanding hazard risk. As such, it is treated in a separate section later in diis cliapter. 

This book is divided into five parts the problem, accidents, health risk, hazard risk, and hazard risk analysis. Part 1, an introduction to HS AM, presents legal considerations, emergency planning, and emergency response. This Part basically ser es as an oveiwiew to the more teclmical topics covered in the remainder of the book. Part 11 treats the broad subject of accidents, discussing fires, explosions and other accidents. The chapters in Parts 111 and Part IV provide introductory material to health and hazard risk assessment, respectively. Pai1 V examines hazaid risk analysis in significant detail. The thiee chapters in this final part include material on fundamentals of applicable statistics theory, and the applications and calculations of risk analysis for real systems. 

The effectiveness of a QA-related independent Part 11 audit is dependent on the checklist or audit plan utilized. Here, provided as a model, is a two-part audit checklist. The depth of the evidence and support required is dependent on the results of the risk assessment All high-, medium-, or low-risk systems should be subject to the same general questions. 

This chapter provides general information for performing qualitative or quantitative risk assessments on buildings in process plants. For detailed guidance on risk assessment techniques, the user is referred to other CCPS books on this subject, including Reference 3, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition, and Reference 4, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. 

The link between the ecological/ecotoxicological risk assessment and the risk management frameworks is demonstrated. The ecological risk assessment consists of seven interactive elements (Fig. 17). The quantitative and descriptive science used to conduct ERA (Table 5) does not answer, in a direct way, the question of what should be done to manage the risk. Science determines adversity, but the public determines acceptability (Fig. 18). But acceptable risk is a highly subjective and relative term. It is time and space-specific and depends upon definitions of quality of life and robustness of the environment. 

The technique of risk assessment is used in a wide range of professions and academic subjects. Accordingly, in this introductory section some basic definitions are necessary. 

This book in not intended to provide in-depth guidance on basic risk assessment principles nor on fire and explosion protection engineering foundations or design practices. Several other excellent books are available on these subjects and some references to these are provided at the end of each chapter. 

Substances that are used only to formulate cosmetics or to manufacture food-packaging materials are dual regulated they still have to be registered under REACH, although they are subject to separate EU measures that involve an evaluation of their safety to humans. Hence, in order to avoid duplication of work, the REACH CSR only has to include an environmental risk assessment. 

Note that in these several examples certain kinds of assumption are used to estimate intakes. In the TCE examples all adults were assumed to consume 2 liters of water each day and were also assumed to weigh 80 kg. Obviously in any population exposed to the contaminated water, it is unlikely that these two assumptions apply with high accuracy to any actual individuals. In fact the assumptions may be quite inaccurate for some individuals, even while they might be reasonably representative, on average, for most. It is in fact not possible to conduct risk assessments without the use of assumptions such as these, and so the individuals that are the subjects of typical risk assessments might be described as generic rather than actual. As will become clear in the later chapters on risk assessment, this type of generic evaluation is appropriate and useful for the purposes of public health protection. 

The subjects of NOAELs and LOAELs are critical to the risk assessment process, and we shall he referring to them throughout the hook. 

An issue of obvious importance in test species selection is the degree to which test results can be reliably applied to human beings. As we noted in the last chapter this is one of the principal problems in the evaluation of human risk, and we shall get back to it in the later chapters on risk assessment. For now, emphasis is on the selection of animal species and strains for their known reliability as experimental subjects. To put it in stark (but honest) terms - the animals are used as toxicity measuring devices. 

How this type of information influences the risk assessment and management processes is the subject of much of the last third of the book. 

The science policy components of risk assessment have led to what have come to be called default assumptions. A default is a specific, automatically applied choice, from among several that are available (in this case it might be, for example, a model for extrapolating animal dose-response data to humans), when such a choice is needed to complete some undertaking (e.g., a risk assessment). We turn in the next chapter to the conduct of risk assessment and the ways in which default assumptions are used under current regulatory guidelines. We might say we have arrived at the central subject of this book. 

Defining the risk assessment problem to be evaluated should precede entering the four-step process set out in Figure 7.1, Chapter 7. This means identifying the population that is to be the subject of the assessment, and specifying the conditions under which it is or may come to be exposed to a chemical or mixture of chemicals. Formulations of the problem might be similar to any of the five examples offered at the beginning of Chapter 7. 

---