Auditing.Part

Process Safety Analysis This part treats the analysis of a process or project from the standpoint of hazards, risks, procedures for making potential damage estimates, and project reviews and audits. It can be helpful to management in assessing risks in a project. It consists of the following ... 

The next process step evaluates the process safety management systems to determine if they are adequate to achieve the desired results, and if they are used as intended. This evaluation is highly subjective on the auditors part. This step sets the stage for the rest of the audit, guiding the auditor s information gathering and focusing attention on critical areas. 

The client should learn about the toller s planned operation, and as part of their product stewardship responsibilities, audit the toller regarding HS E practices. 

Such sessions often help to bring to the surface those parts of the plant where suspect waste issues or pollution problems are most critical. Such areas of operations are most likely to benefit from an audit and P2 program. 

Conventional stoiehiometrie equations show the reaetants that take part and the produets formed in a ehemieal reaetion. However, there is no indieation about what takes plaee during this ehange. A detailed deseription of a ehemieal reaetion outlining eaeh separate stage is referred to as the meehanism. Meehanisms of reaetions are based on experimental data, whieh are seldom eomplete, eoneerning transition states and unstable intermediates. Therefore, they must to be eon-tinually audited and modified as more information is obtained. 

Exeept for the bolded seetions, the following information was taken direetly from a report entitled EPA/LABOR Superfund Elealth and Safety Taskforee OSHA Audits of Superfund Sites 1993 to 1996, dated August 25, 1997. The report is lengthy, so the authors have only ineluded parts of the report they felt to be pertinent to the subjeets within the main body of the book. 

The audit indieated that heat stress programs were generally ineluded in most sites that were audited. The diflfieult part again appears to be in exeeution of the SSHAP, although, in some eases, no provisions were ineluded in the plans for heat/eold stress. 

Wliat we have included is only a small part of a much longer document available in its entirety at the address shown or on the Web. We provide the complete table of contents so that you get a good idea of the subjects covered and the amount of detail taken to cover them. After the table of contents, we have taken several sections applying to working with hazardous substances. We believe that OSHA has chosen these items to ensure a safe and healthful workplace. COSHOs will use this format when performing an OSHA compliance audit on incinerator sites. 

Within the rules are some significant requirements that impact the way auditors will plan, conduct, and report their audits. These are covered in more detail in Part 1 Chapter 6. 

It is permissible for each surveillance audit to re-examine part of the system so that the equivalent of a total assessment is completed within each three-year cycle. 

The auditor needs to establish what constitutes the system and establish the identity of its associated parts (see also Annex 1 of the Rules on Final Report) so that it can be demonstrated that all parts are audited at least once every three years. 

Part of the evidence required is the result of at least one complete internal audit and management review cycle. 

They mainly apply to products as most of them are concerned with protecting the product from damage and deterioration. They apply to the end product and any items that either form part of the product or are used to produce the product, including any tools, test equipment, and processing materials. Although it is possible for some types of services to deteriorate, this use of the term preservation is covered by the process control and auditing requirements. The only requirements that do apply to services are those for identification, unless product is used in the delivery of a service. If the servicing is done to a product, whether or not the product is owned by the supplier, protection of that product is important. 

The system audit to verify that the quality system complies with the appropriate part of ISO 9000. The system audit is a composite of a documentation audit and implementation audit (see below). This is now required in ISO/TS 16949 clause... 

The implementation audit to verify that the documented practices are being followed and that there are no undocumented practices employed that affect quality. This can be divided into two parts, one addressing upper management and their implementation of the strategic plans and one addressing staff and their implementation of the procedures. 

Devise a method of determining when parts of the system were last audited. Decide on the types of audits to be conducted and the level of staff to conduct them. Determine the standards against which the organization is to be audited. 

Audits of a company or parts thereof by personnel employed by the company. These audits are also called internal audits. 

Such audits may therefore be useful as a method of increasing safety awareness and management commitment to safety as part of a more general attempt to reduce accidents. They should be treated as first steps and management must be prepared to do more than just carry out a safety audit. The authors of safety audits must be prepared to provide guidance on the next steps in error reduction once the problems have been identified. 

---