Reliability of assay

The conventional analytical process is comprised of sampling — sample preparation —> analysis —> calculation —> approval of results — report — decision.93 The introduction of productivity measurements to focus attention on continuous improvement and improving the reliability of assays to eliminate re-analysis can aid in re-engineering the process for greater efficiency.93 Automation is another important aspect of improving efficiency.94 The rate-limiting steps in many industrial laboratories, however, may precede or... 

Disadvantages Error addition Insufficient accuracy and precision of Reliability of assay results originating from ... 

Unfortunately there is no commercial assay for routine measurement of serum levels of RCM-specific IgE antibodies. The reliability of other in vitro tests, such as the basophil activation test, has not yet been established. Results from individual patients indicate that the basophil activation test may be helpful [36]. However, at the moment it is only added on an experimental scientific basis. Provocation is not generally recommended, as intravenous applications of as low as 0.5-1 ml RCM have led to severe anaphylaxis [41]. 

The anti-DNA antibody has been used as a marker molecule of Systemic Lupus Erthematosus (SLE) which is a severe autoimmune disease. Enzyme immunoassay is the most reliable, widely used method of assay however, the electrochemical detection method reported here should be interesting for the purpose of a rapid and convenient diagnostic tool of SLE. 

The Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by (8) and (9), were also investigated for Na assay in control serum and urine [22]. The found values for the Na concentrations in both of the serum and urine samples are in good agreement with their corresponding actual values with a relative standard deviation of about 1%. These results suggest that the Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by calix[4]arene neutral carrier (8) are reliable on assay in human body fluid. 

In a so-called competitive immunoassay format the antigen competes with a labeled antigen for a limited number of antibody-binding sites. It can be shown that in this case the ultimate sensitivity of the assay (when the [Ab] approaches zero) is dependent on the equilibrium constant K and the reliability of the signal measurement of the bound fraction at zero dose [15],... 

Detailed analysis of the experimental methods of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species detection is outside the scope of this book. However, the consideration of the most important contemporary analytical assays is necessary because the reliability of the data already considered strongly depends on the reliability of the methods applied. 

Spectrophotometric plate readers Perkin-Elmer s lambda reader, an automated microprocessor-controlled, microplate reader, offers the flexibility of configuring a reliable, user-friendly, versatile system, capable of accommodating a wide variety of assays requiring calorimetric measurement on microscale (<300pl) samples. These assays include ELISA, protein determination, cytotoxicity, cytoproliferation and antibody sensitivity testing. 

As an identity (ID) test, per ICH guidelines, only selectivity is required in method qualification and validation. Repeatability and intermediate precision are often included to ensure reliability of p7 determinations. Additionally, method robustness should be tested to assure that the assay performance is suitable for QC environment. Quantitative parameters such as LOD/LOQ are not required for an ID assay. If a cIEF method is used for purity determination, then all the purity parameters shown in Section 4 should be qualified. The following sections illustrate an example of method development and qualification procedures for cIEF. 

The evaluation of robustness should be considered in the development of the assay and will depend on the type of procedure under development. It must show the reliability of a method with respect to deliberate variations in method parameters. If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions, the analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a precautionary statement might be included in the procedure. One consequence of the evaluation of robustness may be that a series of system suitability parameters is established to ensure that the validity of the analytical procedure is maintained whenever used. Typical parameters to be tested would be the following sample concentration, sample stability, labeling variability (if applicable), injection variability, reagent lot-to-lot variability, and capillary vendor. 

The reliability of the assay method used to determine the concentration of the drug and its possible metabolites. 

The reliability of the SPE-LC-ESI-MS/MS quantitation method of the nonbound marker spiperone was verified in identical binding assays employing [ H] spiperone as marker and (S)-sulpiride as test compound, again quantifying the nonbound marker but this time by scintillation counting. Both the run of the competition curve and the Ki value determined for (S)-sulpiride were in good accordance with the results from the MS binding assays (Table 7.2). 

The precision of an analytical method is usually expressed as the standard deviation or relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation) of a series of measurements. Precision represents repeatability or reproducibility of the analytical method under normal operating conditions. Precision determinations permit an estimate of the reliability of single determinations and are commonly in the range of 0.3 to 3% for dosage form assays. 

The information in this chapter applies specifically to the first element sample preparation. The sample preparation steps are usually the most tedious and labor-intensive part of an analysis. By automating the sample preparation, a significant improvement in efficiency can be achieved. It is important to make sure that (1) suitable instrument qualification has been concluded successfully before initiation of automated sample preparation validation [2], (2) the operational reliability of the automated workstation is acceptable, (3) the analyte measurement procedure has been optimized (e.g., LC run conditions), and (4) appropriate training in use of the instrument has been provided to the operator(s). The equipment used to perform automated sample preparation can be purchased as off-the-shelf units that are precustomized, or it can be built by the laboratory in conjunction with a vendor (custom-designed system). Off-the-shelf workstations for fully automated dissolution testing, automated assay, and content uniformity testing are available from a variety of suppliers, such as Zymark (www.zymark.com) and Sotax (www.sotax.com). These workstations are very well represented in the pharmaceutical industry and are all based on the same functional requirements and basic principles. 

The same authors (G8, G7) also found very substantial decreases in riboflavin (approx. 80%), and niacin (P9) fared little better. When mixtures were irradiated unusual events occurred. Riboflavin and ascorbic acid were each protected by niacin. Addition of cystine or cysteine apparently sensitized the niacin (P10). Since initial rates were not given, and the doses were considerably above the oxygen breakpoint (Sec. IIIA2), no mechanistic interpretation is possible. There also appears to be some doubt about the reliability of the colormetric assay used by these workers. 

---