Quantitative structure-chemical reactivity relationships

Quantitative structure-chemical reactivity relationships (QSRR). Chemical reactivities involve the formation and/or cleavage of chemical bonds. Examples of chemical reactivity data are equilibrium constants, rate constants, polarographic half wave potentials and oxidation-reduction potentials. 

Applications of neural networks are becoming more diverse in chemistry [31-40]. Some typical applications include predicting chemical reactivity, acid strength in oxides, protein structure determination, quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR), fluid property relationships, classification of molecular spectra, group contribution, spectroscopy analysis, etc. The results reported in these areas are very encouraging and are demonstrative of the wide spectrum of applications and interest in this area. 

Within the context of this book the quantitative relationships between structure and chemical reactivity are very informative. One of the early postulates of Ingold and his school in the 1930s (review see Ingold, 1969, p. 78) was that the electronic effects of substituents are composed of two main parts a field/inductive component and a mesomeric component. Hammett s work indicated clearly from the beginning that his substituent constants am and crp reflect Ingold s postulate in numerical terms. In particular, many observations indicated that the /7-substituent constant ap is the sum of a field/inductive component 0 and a resonance (mesomeric) component (Jr. 

Contemporary s Tithetic chemists know detailed information about molecular structures and use sophisticated computer programs to simulate a s Tithesis before trying it in the laboratory. Nevertheless, designing a chemical synthesis requires creativity and a thorough understanding of molecular structure and reactivity. No matter how complex, every chemical synthesis is built on the principles and concepts of general chemistry. One such principle is that quantitative relationships connect the amounts of materials consumed and the amounts of products formed in a chemical reaction. We can use these relationships to calculate the amounts of materials needed to make a desired amount of product and to analyze the efficiency of a chemical synthesis. The quantitative description of chemical reactions is the focus of Chapter 4. 

Methods have been presented, with examples, for obtaining quantitative structure-property relationships for alternating conjugated and cross-conjugated dienes and polyenes, and for adjacent dienes and polyenes. The examples include chemical reactivities, chemical properties and physical properties. A method of estimating electrical effect substituent constants for dienyl and polyenyl substituents has been described. The nature of these substituents has been discussed, but unfortunately the discussion is very largely based on estimated values. A full understanding of structural effects on dienyl and polyenyl systems awaits much further experimental study. It would be particularly useful to have more chemical reactivity studies on their substituent effects, and it would be especially helpful if chemical reactivity studies on the transmission of electrical effects in adjacent multiply doubly bonded systems were available. Only further experimental work will show how valid our estimates and predictions are. 

As the chemical models mentioned here refer to some fundamental thermochemical and electronic effects of molecules, their application is not restricted to the prediction of chemical reactivity data. In fact, in the development of the models extensive comparisons were made with physical data, and thus such data can also be predicted from our models. Furthermore, some of the mechanisms responsible for binding substrates to receptors are naturally enough founded on quite similar electronic effects to those responsible for chemical reactivity. This suggest the use of the models developed here to calculate parameters for quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). 

There are several properties of a chemical that are related to exposure potential or overall reactivity for which structure-based predictive models are available. The relevant properties discussed here are bioaccumulation, oral, dermal, and inhalation bioavailability and reactivity. These prediction methods are based on a combination of in vitro assays and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) [3]. QSARs are simple, usually linear, mathematical models that use chemical structure descriptors to predict first-order physicochemical properties, such as water solubility. Other, similar models can then be constructed that use the first-order physicochemical properties to predict more complex properties, including those of interest here. Chemical descriptors are properties that can be calculated directly from a chemical structure graph and can include abstract quantities, such as connectivity indices, or more intuitive properties, such as dipole moment or total surface area. QSAR models are parameterized using training data from sets of chemicals for which both structure and chemical properties are known, and are validated against other (independent) sets of chemicals. 

Canonica, S., and P. G. Tratnyek, Quantitative structure reactivity relationships (QSARs) for oxidation reactions of organic chemicals in water , Environ. Tox. Chem., 21, in press (2003). 

Chemical reactivity and biological activity can be related to molecular structure and physicochemical properties. QSAR models can be established among hydrophobic-lipophilic, electronic, and steric properties, between quantum-mechanics-related parameters and toxicity and between environmental fate parameters such as sorption and tendency for bioaccumulation. The main objective of a QSAR study is to develop quantitative relationships between given properties of a set of chemicals and their molecular descriptors. To develop a valid QSAR model, the following steps are essential ... 

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are important for predicting the oxidation potential of chemicals in Fenton s reaction system. To describe reactivity and physicochemical properties of the chemicals, five different molecular descriptors were applied. The dipole moment represents the polarity of a molecule and its effect on the reaction rates HOMo and LUMO approximate the ionization potential and electron affinities, respectively and the log P coefficient correlates the hydrophobicity, which can be an important factor relative to reactivity of substrates in aqueous media. Finally, the effect of the substituents on the reaction rates could be correlated with Hammett constants by Hammett s equation. 

Freidig, A.P., Verhaaar, H.J.M., Hermens, J.L.M. (1999) Quantitative structure-property relationships for the chemical reactivity of acrylates and methacrylates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18, 1133-1139. 

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) dates back to the nineteenth century and is a computer-based tool that attempts to correlate variations in structural or molecular properties of compounds with their biological activities. These physicochemical descriptors, which include parameters to account for hydrophobicity, topology, electronic properties, and steric effects, are determined empirically or, more recently, by computational methods. The premise is that the structure of a chemical determines the physiochemical properties and reactivities that underlie its biological and toxicological properties. Being able to predict potential adverse effects not only aids in the designed development of new chemicals but also reduces the need for animal testing. It may ultimately or potentially lead to better... 

The interaction of the atoms and electrons within a specific molecule determines the impact of the compound at the molecular level. The contribution of the physical-chemical characteristics of a compound to the observed toxicity is called quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). QSAR has the potential of enabling environmental toxicologists to predict the environmental consequences of toxicants using only structure as a guide. The response of a chemical to ultraviolet radiation and its reactivity with the abiotic constituents of the environment determine the fate of a compound. 

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs) refer to scientific methods for correlating chemical structures quantitatively with biological activity or chemical reactivity. 

Additive (group contribution) methods have a long tradition of successful use in predicting the properties of both ordinary molecules and macromolecules (polymers). They have formed the backbone of the quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) [1,2] used to predict the chemical reactivity and the biological activity of molecules in medicinal and agricultural chemistry. They have also been used extensively in many quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) developed for the physical and chemical properties of polymers. 

---