Resistance polarization

Polarization resistance (Rp) techniques can be used to continuously monitor the instantaneous corrosion rate of a metal. Mansfeld provided a thorough review of the use of the polarization resistance technique for the measurement of corrosion currents. R is defined as  

The exact calculation of icorr for a given time requires simultaneous measurements of Rp and anodic and cathodic Tafel slopes (/ and be). Computer programs have been developed for the determination of precise values of /corr according to Eqs. (2) and (3). Experimental values of Rp (2p contain a contribution from the uncompensated solution resistance 

Significant errors in the calculation of corrosion rates can occur for electrolytes of low conductivity or systems with very high corrosion rates (low Rp) if a correction for is not applied. Corrosion rates will be underestimated in these cases. Additional problems can arise from the effects of the sweep rate used to determine Rp according to Eq. (1). If the 

Applications of Rp techniques have been reported by King et al. in a study of the corrosion behavior of iron pipes in environments containing SRB. In a similar study, Kasahara and Kajiyama used Rp measurements with compensation of the ohmic drop and reported results for active and inactive SRB. Nivens et al. calculated the corrosion current density from experimental Rp data and Tafel slopes for 304 stainless steel exposed to a seawater medium containing the non-SRB Vibrio mtriegens. 

A qualitative measure of the corrosion rate can be obtained from the slope of the curves in Fig. 2. Z INT is given in units of s ohm . Owing to the presence of the uncompensated ohmic resistance and lack of values for Tafel slopes [Eq. (2)], data in Fig. 2 should be viewed as indicative of significant changes in corrosion rates. Corrosion loss remained low during the first 2 months, followed by a large increase for both flushed samples and controls. The corrosion rate increased when the surface pH reached values of 1 or less. Total corrosion loss as determined from integrated Rp data was less for the control than for the flushed sample. 

Linear polarization resistance (R ) is defined as the charge transfer resistance of the solution-metal interface. The linear polarization technique was employed to measure the Rp values of the A1 alloy surfaces after different pretreatments. Polarization 

In contrast, a significant increase of the Rp values was observed with the application of a thin layer of TMS plasma polymers (about 50 nm) on these chemically treated [2A] surfaces. It was also noted that these TMS plasma polymer-coated [2A] samples have the same level of Rp values as the [2A]CC controls. These results clearly indicate that these plasma polymer coatings have a good corrosion resistance property. 

Plasma polymer-coated [2B] surfaces showed higher polarization resistance than native and chemically cleaned surfaces. Thus, the corrosion resistance of plasma polymer-coated [2B] was much higher than that of the barrier-type oxides formed after chemical cleaning. Also, as is evident from the higher polarization resistance of the plasma polymers, they are good barriers to water, oxygen, and corrosive species, even under an externally applied potential. The Rp values of the 

Deoxidized surfaces of [7B] with a plasma polymer coating ([7B] (Dox)/T) showed higher polarization resistance than the chemically deoxidized surfaces without a plasma polymer. This indicates that the added corrosion resistance offered by plasma polymer films is much higher than that of the barrier-type oxides, formed after chemical cleaning, alone. As compared to the chromate conversion-coated surfaces ([7B] CQ, the deoxidized and plasma polymer-coated ([7B] (Dox)/T) surfaces showed higher Rp values, suggesting that these surfaces have higher corrosion resistance. 

Two types of corrosion evaluation tests, SO2 and Prohesion salt spray tests, were employed for the evaluation of corrosion protection characteristics of painted plasma systems. The SO2 salt spray test was chosen to speed up differentiation of the corrosion protection properties of the different systems investigated. The Prohesion 

Capacitors in EIS experiments often do not behave ideally. Instead, they act like a constant phase element (CPE) as defined below for the impedance of a capacitor  

When this equation describes a capacitor, the constant A = 1/C (the inverse of the capacitance) and the exponent a = 1. For a CPE, the exponent a is less than one. The double layer capacitor on real cells often behaves like a CPE instead of a capacitor. 

Whenever the potential of an electrode is forced away from its value at open circuit, it is referred to as polarizing the electrode. When an electrode is polarized, it can cause current to flow via electrochemical reactions that occur at the electrode surface. The amount of current is controlled by the kinetics of the reactions and the diffusion of reactants both toward and away from the electrode. The open circuit potential is controlled by the equilibrium between two different electrochemical reactions. One of the reactions generates cathodic current and the other generates anodic current. The open circuit potential ends up at the potential where the cathodic and anodic currents are equal. 

For kinetically controlled reactions occurring, the potential of the cell is related to the current by the following (known as the Butler-Volmer equation, Equation 5.77)  

---

Other techniques to detennine the corrosion rate use instead of DC biasing, an AC approach (electrochemical impedance spectroscopy). From the impedance spectra, the polarization resistance (R ) of the system can be detennined. The polarization resistance is indirectly proportional to j. An advantage of an AC method is given by the fact that a small AC amplitude applied to a sample at the corrosion potential essentially does not remove the system from equilibrium. 

When a battery produces current, the sites of current production are not uniformly distributed on the electrodes (45). The nonuniform current distribution lowers the expected performance from a battery system, and causes excessive heat evolution and low utilization of active materials. Two types of current distribution, primary and secondary, can be distinguished. The primary distribution is related to the current production based on the geometric surface area of the battery constmction. Secondary current distribution is related to current production sites inside the porous electrode itself. Most practical battery constmctions have nonuniform current distribution across the surface of the electrodes. This primary current distribution is governed by geometric factors such as height (or length) of the electrodes, the distance between the electrodes, the resistance of the anode and cathode stmctures by the resistance of the electrolyte and by the polarization resistance or hinderance of the electrode reaction processes. 

Linear polarization re.slstance probe.s. LPR probes are more recent in origin, and are steadily gaining in use. These probes work on a principle outlined in an ASTM guide on making polarization resistance measurements, providing instantaneous corrosion rate measurements (G59, Standard Practice for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements ). 

LPR probes measure the electrochemical corrosion mechanism involved in the interaction of the metal with the electrolyte. To measure hnear polarization resistance R, l/cm", the following assumptions must be made ... 

Polarization probes rely on the relationship of the applied potential to the output current per unit area (current density). The slope of applied potential versus current density extrapolated through the origin, yields the polarization resistance Rp, which can be related to the corrosion rate. 

There are several methods for relating the corrosion current, the apphed potential, and the polarization resistance. These methods involve various ways of stepping or ramping either the potential or current. Also, a constant value of potential or current can be applied. 

ASTM G59, Standard Prac tice for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements, provides instructions for the graphical plotting of data (from tests conducted using the above-noted ASTM Standard G103) as the hnear potential versus current density, from which the polarization resistance can be found. 

Measurements of polarization resistance Rp, given by LPR probes, can lead to measurement of the corrosion rate at a specific instant, since values of Rp are instantaneous. 

To obtain the corrosion current from Rp, values for the anodic and cathodic slopes must be known or estimated. ASTM G59 provides an experimental procedure for measuring Rp. A discussion or the factors which may lead to errors in the values for Rp, and cases where Rp technique cannot be used, are covered by Mansfeld in Polarization Resistance Measurements—Today s Status, Electrochemical Techniques for Corrosion Engineers (NACE International, 1992). 

The ratio of the areas of cathodes to anodes is decisive for the potential damage resulting from cell formation [16,17]. Using the integral (mean) polarization resistances... 

In electrochemical protection the necessary range of protection current is achieved by an appropriate arrangement of the electrodes. It follows that measures which raise the polarization resistance are beneficial. Coated objects have a coating resistance (see Section 5.2), which can be utilized in much the same way as the polarization resistance in Eq. (2-45). Therefore, the range in the medium can be extended almost at will by coatings for extended objects, even at low conductivity. However, the range is then limited by current supply to the object to be protected (see Section 24.4). 

In contrast to signal spread, according to Eq. (3-48) for a coating with few defects, in this case a locally almost constant conductivity is assumed. For the extreme case of an uncoated pipe and neglecting the ohmic polarization resistances, there is a distance x = a where both voltage drops of Eqs. (3-52) and (3-53) are equal... 

Differences in rest potential can be about 0.5 V for cell formation with foreign cathodic structures. The danger increases on coated construction components with coating defects of decreasing size on account of the surface rule [Eq. (2-44)], and is limited, for a given soil resistivity p-Mv., not by the grounding resistance of the defect / , but rather by the pore resistance R2 and the polarization resistance of Rp. 

Protection current density and coating resistance are important for the current distribution and for the range of the electrochemical protection. The coating resistance determines, as does the polarization resistance, the polarization parameter (see Sections 2.2.5 and 24.5). For pipelines the protection current density determines the length of the protection range (see Section 24.4.3). 

The current-density-potential graph for a working galvanic anode is given by Eq. (6-8) in which the polarization resistance /j, is dependent on loading ... 

Almost all common metals and structural steels are liable to corrode in seawater. Regulations have to be followed in the proper choice of materials [16], In addition, there is a greater risk of corrosion in mixed constructions consisting of different metals on account of the good conductivity of seawater. The electrochemical series in seawater (see Table 2-4), the surface area rule [Eq. (2-44)] and the geometrical arrangement of the structural components serve to assess the possibility of bimetallic corrosion (see Section 2.2.4.2 and Ref. 17). Moreover the polarization resistances have considerable influence [see Eq. (2-43)]. The standards on bimetallic corrosion provide a survey [16,17]. 

It should be clearly pointed out that with anodic interference according to the data in Fig. 2-6 in Section 2.2.4.1, the corrosivity of the electrolyte for the particular material has no influence on the current exit corrosion. On the other hand, the conductivity of the electrolyte has an effect according to Eqs. (24-102) and (20-4). Chemical parameters have a further influence that determines the formation of surface films and the polarization resistance. 

As the measurements show, the small heater without an electrical separation (from the boiler) is not detrimental to cathodic protection. However, with the uninsulated built-in Cu heat exchanger without an electrical separation, cathodic protection was not achieved. As expected, the polarization increased with increasing conductivity of the water. It should be pointed out that the Cu tube was tinned and that the tin could act as a weak cathodic component. Apart from the unknown long-term stability of such a coating, the apparent raising of the cathodic polarization resistance of tin is not sufficient to provide cathodic protection with such a large fixture. This applies also to other metal coatings (e.g., nickel). 

Good current distribution can be expected because of the good conductivity of the electrolyte. However, if a large area of the coating is damaged, local underprotection cannot be ruled out due to the low polarization resistance. For this reason, control with several reference electrodes is advisable. 

The transition resistance between the surface of the metal and the electrolyte with uncoated iron anodes in coke backfill, the transition resistance is usually low. With metals in soil, it can be increased by films of grease, paint, rust or deposits. It contains in addition an electrochemical polarization resistance that depends on the current [see Eq. (2-35)]. 

Here is the specific cathodic polarization resistance which is assumed to be a constant in what follows. The cathodic J U) curve is therefore given by ... 

Since/(a) is a monotonically increasing function, the protection region, a, increases with the polarization parameter, k. As an example, a symmetrical coplanar electrode arrangement with equally large anodic and cathodic polarization resistances is considered. Here/(jc) is defined as [19] ... 

Impedance spectroscopy This technique is essentially the extension of polarization resistance measurements into low-conductivity environments, including those listed above. The technique can also be used to monitor atmospheric corrosion, corrosion under thin films of condensed liquid and the breakdown of protective paint coatings. Additionally, the method provides mechanistic data concerning the corrosion processes, which are taking place. 

Figure 8.13. (a) Cyclic voltammetric investigation of the Ir02/YSZ interface (inset shows the circuit used to model the data)19 and (b) Effect of catalyst-electrode mass on the polarization resistance Rp and the double layer capacitance Cd.19 Scan rate 20 mV/s, T=380°C, pO2=20 kPa. 

A simplification of the polarization resistance technique is the linear polarization technique in which it is assumed that the relationship between E and i is linear in a narrow range around E . Usually only two points ( , 0 are measured and B is assumed to have a constant value of about 20 mV. This approach is used in field tests and forms the basis of commercial corrosion rate monitors. Rp can also be determined as the dc limit of the electrochemical impedance. Mansfeld et al. used the linear polarization technique to determine Rp for mild steel sensors embedded in concrete exposed to a sewer environment for about 9 months. One sensor was periodically flushed with sewage in an attempt to remove the sulfuric acid produced by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria within a biofilm another sensor was used as a control. A data logging system collected Rp at 10-min intervals simultaneously for the two corrosion sensors and two pH electrodes placed at the concrete surface. Figure 2 shows the cumulative corrosion loss (Z INT) obtained by integration of the MRp time curves as ... 

---