Current potential density

Plating bath Anodes Corrosion process Current Potential density (V) (A/m ) (vj.S.H.E.) ... 

The expression for the mass-transport-limiting current density may be employed together with the Nemst equation to deduce the complete current-potential response in a solution containing only oxidized or reduced species... 

Passivation is manifested in a polarization curve (figure C2.8.4) dashed line) by a dramatic decrease in current at a particular onset potential (the passivation potential, density, is lowered by several orders of magnitude. 

The potential dependence of the velocity of an electrochemical phase boundary reaction is represented by a current-potential curve I(U). It is convenient to relate such curves to the geometric electrode surface area S, i.e., to present them as current-density-potential curves J(U). The determination of such curves is represented schematically in Fig. 2-3. A current is conducted to the counterelectrode Ej in the electrolyte by means of an external circuit (voltage source Uq, ammeter, resistances R and R") and via the electrode E, to be measured, back to the external circuit. In the diagram, the current indicated (0) is positive. The potential of E, is measured with a high-resistance voltmeter as the voltage difference of electrodes El and E2. To accomplish this, the reference electrode, E2, must be equipped with a Haber-Luggin capillary whose probe end must be brought as close as possible to... 

A current of density 5- amperes per square decimetre of cathode space and a potential of 3 volts is used, and the temperature is maintained at between 75° and 85° C. During the electrolytic action, the nitro-cymene is kept in thorough emulsion in the aqueous acid solution by means of the agitator. 

The severity of corrosion interaction will depend on the density of the stray current discharged at any point on the secondary structure. This may be assessed by measuring the changes in structure/soil potential due to the application of the protection current. Potential tests should be concentrated on the portions of pipe or cable which are close to the structure to be cathodic-ally protected, where the potential change is likely to be more positive. 

The effects of adsorbed inhibitors on the individual electrode reactions of corrosion may be determined from the effects on the anodic and cathodic polarisation curves of the corroding metaP . A displacement of the polarisation curve without a change in the Tafel slope in the presence of the inhibitor indicates that the adsorbed inhibitor acts by blocking active sites so that reaction cannot occur, rather than by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. An increase in the Tafel slope of the polarisation curve due to the inhibitor indicates that the inhibitor acts by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. However, the determination of the Tafel slope will often require the metal to be polarised under conditions of current density and potential which are far removed from those of normal corrosion. This may result in differences in the adsorption and mechanistic effects of inhibitors at polarised metals compared to naturally corroding metals . Thus the interpretation of the effects of inhibitors at the corrosion potential from applied current-potential polarisation curves, as usually measured, may not be conclusive. This difficulty can be overcome in part by the use of rapid polarisation methods . A better procedure is the determination of true polarisation curves near the corrosion potential by simultaneous measurements of applied current, corrosion rate (equivalent to the true anodic current) and potential. However, this method is rather laborious and has been little used. 

Current density versus electrode potential curves (current-potential curves)... 

The current-potential relationship predieted by Eqs. (49) and (50) differs strongly from the Butler-Volmer law. For y 1 the eurrent density is proportional to the eleetro-static driving force. Further, the shape of the eurrent-potential curves depends on the ratio C1/C2 the curve is symmetrical only when the two bulk concentrations are equal (see Fig. 19), otherwise it can be quite unsymmetrieal, so that the interface can have rectifying properties. Obviously, these current-potential eurves are quite different from those obtained from the lattice-gas model. 

The basic theory of mass transfer to a RHSE is similar to that of a RDE. In laminar flow, the limiting current densities on both electrodes are proportional to the square-root of rotational speed they differ only in the numerical values of a proportional constant in the mass transfer equations. Thus, the methods of application of a RHSE for electrochemical studies are identical to those of the RDE. The basic procedure involves a potential sweep measurement to determine a series of current density vs. electrode potential curves at various rotational speeds. The portion of the curves in the limiting current regime where the current is independent of the potential, may be used to determine the diffusivity or concentration of a diffusing ion in the electrolyte. The current-potential curves below the limiting current potentials are used for evaluating kinetic information of the electrode reaction. 

The film electrodeposition process was studied by means of linear sweep voltammetry. The rate of electrochemical reaction was determined from current density (current-potential curves). The film deposits were characterized by chemical analysis, IR - spectroscopy, XRD, TG, TGA and SEM methods. 

In general, the effects of the process variables on electrocodeposition are often interdependent and therefore, are ill understood. Often a slight change of one variable can sometimes lead to a dramatic change in the amount of particle incorporation. For specific systems, the current density at which maximum incorporation occurs seems to be related to a change in the slope of the current-potential relation-... 

Fig. 2. Current-potential curves in Evans diagram [29] format for reduction of Cu2+ ions and oxidation of H2CO. and are the equilibrium, or open circuit, potentials for the Cu2+ reduction and H2CO oxidation reactions, respectively. Assuming negligible interfering reactions, the vertical dashed lines indicate the exchange current densities for the two half reactions, and the deposition current for the complete electroless solution. Adapted from ref. 23.

The data shown in Figure 2.36 were gathered at constant current with a value of the current density that brought the electrode potential at the foot of the current-potential characteristic of the system. The concentration of substrate may thus be considered as constant. As discussed in Section 2.5, we consider only the case where the second electron transfer in the radical-substrate coupling pathway occurs at the electrode (ECE). The following equations and conditions apply. 

SWV experiments are usually performed on stationary solid electrodes or static merciuy drop electrodes. The response consists of discrete current-potential points separated by the potential increment AE [1,20-23]. Hence, AE determines the apparent scan rate, which is defined as AE/t, and the density of information in the response, which is a number of current-potential points within a certain potential range. The currents increase proportionally to the apparent scan rate. For better graphical presentation, the points can be interconnected, but the fine between two points has no physical significance, as there is no theoretical reason to interpolate any mathematical function between two experimentally determined current-potential points. The currents measured with smaller A are smaller than the values predicted by the interpolation between two points measured with bigger AE [3]. Frequently, the response is distorted by electronic noise and a smoothing procedure is necessary for its correct interpretation. In this case, it is better if AE is as small as possible. By smoothing, the set of discrete points is transformed into a continuous current-potential curve. Care should be taken that the smoothing procedttre does not distort the square-wave response. 

Current-Potential Relationship for Partial Reactions, Partial i = /(A(/)) functions can be derived by joining equations expressing the rate of electrochemical reactions in terms of current [Eqs. (6.18) and (6.20)] and equations expressing the rate constant as a function of potential [Eqs. (6.31) and (6.32)]. Thus, the cathodic partial current density i is obtained from Eqs. (6.18) and (6.31) to yield... 

For example, if Qi = 50 tF/cm and R = 2 fi, t = 4.6 X 10 " s (0.46 ms). Thus, in the galvanostatic transient technique, the duration of the input current density pulse is on the order of milliseconds. From a series of measurements of for a set of i values, one can construct the current-potential relationship for an electrochemical process. For example. Figure 6.20 shows the current-potential relationship for the electrodeposition of copper from acid CUSO4 solution. 

Electroless Deposition in the Presence of Interfering Reactions. According to the mixed-potential theory, the total current density, is a result of simple addition of current densities of the two partial reactions, 4 and However, in the presence of interfering (or side) reactions, 4 and/or may be composed of two or more components themselves, and verification of the mixed-potential theory in this case would involve superposition of current-potential curves for the electroless process investigated with those of the interfering reactions in order to correctly interpret the total i-E curve. Two important examples are discussed here. 

Boltzmann term, 1078 computer simulation. 1161 current density, 1078, 1081 current potential relation, 1082 doping, 1073 effect of light on, 785 -/junction, 1081 electrode kinetics of, 170 electrodeposition on, 1344... 

After a stepwise change of the potential from Ei to a value E within the faradaic region, where kf and/or kb have a substantial value, a current with density jF will start to flow and the interfacial concentrations will change with time. In the simple case adopted for this section, eqn. (18)... 

Figure 28.5 Current-potential curves for p-GaP under low- to moderate-intensity illumination a 1 M NaCl (pH = 1) electrolyte is employed. Illumination is from a 200-W high-pressure mercury lamp filtered with neutral density filter. Intensity is relative to the full lamp output. The H2/H+ redox potential is -0.3 V vs. SCE in this cell. Thus, this cell yields approximately 400 mV of open-circuit photovoltage. Note that increased illumination increases both the saturation photocurrent and the onset potential. Although the photocurrent is increased at higher light intensities, a calculation of the quantum yield for electron flow indicates that this parameter decreases with increased light intensity.

---