Plasticisers, analysis Extraction

Chemical analysis of rubber (specific gravity extract, filler, CB, polymer and sulfur analysis antidegradant and plasticiser analysis)... 

Plasticiser/oil in rubber is usually determined by solvent extraction (ISO 1407) and FTIR identification [57] TGA can usually provide good quantifications of plasticiser contents. Antidegradants in rubber compounds may be determined by HS-GC-MS for volatile species (e.g. BHT, IPPD), but usually solvent extraction is required, followed by GC-MS, HPLC, UV or DP-MS analysis. Since cross-linked rubbers are insoluble, more complex extraction procedures must be carried out. The determination of antioxidants in rubbers by means of HPLC and TLC has been reviewed [58], The TLC technique for antidegradants in rubbers is described in ASTM D 3156 and ISO 4645.2 (1984). Direct probe EIMS was also used to analyse antioxidants (hindered phenols and aromatic amines) in rubber extracts [59]. ISO 11089 (1997) deals with the determination of /V-phenyl-/9-naphthylamine and poly-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (TMDQ) as well as other generic types of antiozonants such as IV-alkyl-AL-phenyl-p-phenylenediamines (e.g. IPPD and 6PPD) and A-aryl-AL-aryl-p-phenylenediamines (e.g. DPPD), by means of HPLC. 

It is of interest to examine the development of the analytical toolbox for rubber deformulation over the last two decades and the role of emerging technologies (Table 2.9). Bayer technology (1981) for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of rubbers and elastomers consisted of a multitechnique approach comprising extraction (Soxhlet, DIN 53 553), wet chemistry (colour reactions, photometry), electrochemistry (polarography, conductometry), various forms of chromatography (PC, GC, off-line PyGC, TLC), spectroscopy (UV, IR, off-line PylR), and microscopy (OM, SEM, TEM, fluorescence) [10]. Reported applications concerned the identification of plasticisers, fatty acids, stabilisers, antioxidants, vulcanisation accelerators, free/total/bound sulfur, minerals and CB. Monsanto (1983) used direct-probe MS for in situ quantitative analysis of additives and rubber and made use of 31P NMR [69]. 

Contaminated solvents and glassware are a very well known problem in analysis involving extraction. The major problem in the use of solvents is contamination with plasticisers, especially DEHP. After sample extraction usually enrichment of the analytes is required prior to the analysis. 

Brandt [200] has extracted tri(nonylphenyl) phosphite (TNPP) from a styrene-butadiene polymer using iso-octane. Brown [211] has reported US extraction of acrylic acid monomer from polyacrylates. Ultrasonication was also shown to be a fast and efficient extraction method for organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticisers [212]. Greenpeace [213] has recently reported the concentration of phthalate esters in 72 toys (mostly made in China) using shaking and sonication extraction methods. Extraction and analytical procedures were carefully quality controlled. QC procedures and acceptance criteria were based on USEPA method 606 for the analysis of phthalates in water samples [214]. Extraction efficiency was tested by spiking blank matrix and by standard addition to phthalate-containing samples. For removal of fatty acids from the surface of EVA pellets a lmin ultrasonic bath treatment in isopropanol is sufficient [215]. It has been noticed that the experimental ultrasonic extraction conditions are often ill defined and do not allow independent verification. 

Some typical applications in SFE of polymer/additive analysis are illustrated below. Hunt et al. [333] found that supercritical extraction of DIOP and Topanol CA from ground PVC increased with temperature up to 90 °C at 45 MPa, then levelled off, presumably as solubility became the limiting factor. The extraction of DOP and DBP plasticisers from PVC by scC02 at 52 MPa increased from 50 to 80 °C, when extraction was almost complete in 25 min [336]. At 70 °C the amount extracted increased from 79 to 95 % for pressures from 22 to 60 MPa. SFE has the potential to shorten extraction times for traces (<20ppm) of additives (DBP and DOP) in flexible PVC formulations with similar or even better extraction efficiencies compared with traditional LSE techniques [384]. Marin et al. [336] have used off-line SFE-GC to determine the detection limits for DBP and DOP in flexible PVC. The method developed was compared with Soxhlet liquid extraction. At such low additive concentrations a maximum efficiency in the extractive process and an adequate separative system are needed to avoid interferences with other components that are present at high concentrations in the PVC formulations, such as DINP. Results obtained... 

Applications Conventional TLC was the most successful separation technique in the 1960s and early 1970s for identification of components in plastics. Amos [409] has published a comprehensive review on the use of TLC for various additive types (antioxidants, stabilisers, plasticisers, curing agents, antistatic agents, peroxides) in polymers and rubber vulcanisates (1973 status). More recently, Freitag [429] has reviewed TLC applications in additive analysis. TLC has been extensively applied to the determination of additives in polymer extracts [444,445]. 

Applications Open-column chromatography was used for polymer/additive analysis mainly in the 1950-1970 period (cf. Vimalasiri et al. [160]). Examples are the application of CC to styrene-butadiene copoly-mer/(additives, low-MW compounds) [530] and rubbers accelerators, antioxidants) [531]. Column chromatography of nine plasticisers in PVC with various elution solvents has been reported [44], as well as the separation of CHCI3 solvent extracts of PE/(BHT, Santonox R) on an alumina column [532]. Similarly, Santonox R and Ionol CP were easily separated using benzene and Topanol CA and dilaurylthiodipropionate using cyclohexane ethyl acetate (9 1 v/v) [533]. CC on neutral alumina has been used for the separation of antioxidants, accelerators and plasticisers in rubber extracts [534]. Column chromatography of polymer additives has been reviewed [160,375,376]. 

Aromatic amines formed from the reduction of azo colorants in toy products were analysed by means of HPLC-PDA [703], Drews et al. [704] have applied HPLC/ELSD and UV/VIS detection for quantifying SFE and ASE extracts of butyl stearate finish on various commercial yarns. From the calibrated ELSD response the total extract (finish and polyester trimer) is obtained and from the UV/VIS response the trimer only. Representative SFE-ELSD/UV finish analysis data compare satisfactorily to their corresponding SFE gravimetric weight recovery results. GC, HPLC and SEC are also used for characterisation of low-MW compounds (e.g. curing agents, plasticisers, by-products of curing reactions) in epoxy resin adhesives. 

In conclusion, IR analysis of polymer/additive extracts before chromatographic separation takes advantage mainly of straightforward transmission measurements. Without separation it is often possible to make class assignments (e.g. in the reported examples on plasticisers and carbodiimide hydrolysis stabilisers) it may eventually be necessary to use multivariate techniques. Infrared detection of chromatographic effluents is dealt with in Chapter 7. 

Applications Identification of polymer additives by TLC-IR is labour intensive and comprises extraction, concentration of extracts, component separation by TLC on silica, drying, removal of spots, preparation of KBr pellets and IR analysis. The method was illustrated with natural rubber formulations, where N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazyl sulfenamide, IPPD and 6PPD antioxidants, and a naphthenic plasticiser were readily quantified [765]. An overview of polymer/additive type compounds analysed by transfer TLC-FTIR is given in Table 7.80. 

Applications Most plasticisers can be removed almost quantitatively from PVC by Soxhlet extraction or direct refluxing with diethyl ether for several hours. With the dissolution (THF)/reprecipitation (n-hexane) method, PVC compounds can be isolated. However, reliable results are also obtained by using a short cut in which a PVC compound (0.3g) is dissolved in THF (lOg), insoluble material is allowed to settle and then the THF solution including PVC is injected on to the GC column [12]. Although direct gas chromatographic analysis... 

Whereas the use of conventional fast atom bombardment (FAB) in the analysis of polymer/additive extracts has been reported (see Section 6.2.4), the need for a glycerol (or other polar) matrix might render FAB-MS analysis of a dissolved polymer/additive system rather unattractive (high chemical background, high level of matrix-, solvent- and polymer-related ions, complicated spectra). Yet, in selected cases the method has proved quite successful. Lay and Miller [53] have developed an alternative method to the use of sample extraction, cleanup, followed by GC in the quantitative analysis of PVC/DEHP with plasticiser levels as typically found in consumer products (ca. 30 %). The method relied on addition of the internal standard didecylphthalate (DDP) to a THF solution of the PVC sample with FAB-MS quantitation based on the relative signal levels of the [MH]+ ions of DEHP and DDP obtained from full-scan spectra, and on the use of a calibration curve (intensity ratio m/z 391/447 vs. mg DEHP/mg DDP). No FAB-matrix was added. No ions associated with the bulk of the PVC polymer were observed. It was... 

For applications requiring high temperature and extraction resistance, polymeric esters are used (88). New polymeric plasticisers are in development (87) including adipate based for improved low temperature properties (103). Plastisols based on propyleneglycol adipate have been examined (198) and the thermal degradation has been determined using dynamic and isothermal thermogravimetric analysis (188). 

Robertson and Rowley [18] studied the extraction of plasticisers from PVC using different solvents prior to analysis by IR spectroscopy. 

Turnstall [81] has described a gas chromatographic method for the determination of plasticisers in propellent compositions. This procedure which might also be applicable to polymer extracts involves extracting the sample with dichloromethane and concentration of the extract for analysis on a column (2 m x 3.175 mm) of 5% of Antarox CO-990 on AW-DMCS Chromosorb G (80 to 100 mesh) the column was operated at 185 "C, with nitrogen as carrier gas (25 ml per minute) and flame ionisation detection. The method permitted the measurement of dimethyl phthalate, dimethyl sebacate, triacetin, diacetin, and diethyl phthalate. 

Two general methods of plasticiser determination were distinguished between by Guiochon and Henniker [82] with and without preliminary extraction. Either may precede infrared spectrometry or GC. The most common method is to use ether to extract the plasticisers to be determined. If a quantitative analysis is required, the sample should be thin (0.1 mm or less) and should be extracted for several hours (usually 10 hours) to ensure that extraction is complete. If extraction is to be followed by spectrometry, care must be taken to eliminate all solvent by drying for 2-3 hours at 80 "C. If the analysis is to be done by chromatography, drying is unnecessary since the solvent is much more volatile than the plasticiser and will be well separated. 

The direct analysis of plasticisers in a polymer is of considerable interest as it would eliminate the preliminary extraction. Effectively this is possible by infrared spectrometry... 

---