Pesticides individual types

Based on the patch method to assess worker or re-entry exposure, researchers have developed a database, which may be used to estimate exposure. Each patch from an individual in a study can be entered into the database separately, the residue data from patches from various body areas can be summed to yield a whole-body exposure number, and the data may be sorted as to worker tasks, equipment used, protective clothing worn, formulation types and other parameters. This is the basis for the currently used Pesticide Handlers Data Base (PHED), which was developed through a joint effort in the 1980s of CropLife America [formerly known as American Crop Protection Association (ACPA) and National Agricultural Chemicals Association (NACA)], the Environmental Protection Agency (ERA) and Health Canada. " The PHED is discussed in detail in another article in this book. 

However, it is not possible to categorize the type of combined action because Chaturvedi (1993) only examined the combined effects of the 10 compounds in the mixture and did not consider the effect of the individual pesticides. 

If the assessment endpoint is a distribution, or a statistic from a distribution (e.g., 95th percentile), it is essential to be clear how the distribution is interpreted (Suter 1998, p 129). If it is a frequency distribution, to what statistical population does the distribution refer For example, does the distribution represent a population of individuals, an assemblage of species, a number of locations treated with pesticides, or a series of time periods The answer to this question has substantial implications for the structure of the assessment model and the types of data required. 

Variability refers to observed differences in a population or parameter attributable to true heterogeneity (Brusle 1991). It is the result of natural random or stochastic processes and stems from, for example, environmental, lifestyle, and genetic differences. Examples include variation between individuals in pesticide sensitivity and foraging behavior (e.g., time spent foraging in the agroenvironment) and between locations (e.g., soil type, climate, chemical concentration). 

There are 14 analytical methods developed by U.S. EPA for measuring common organic pollutants in air. These analytes include aldehydes and ketones, chlorinated pesticides, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, and many volatile organic compounds. These methods may also be applied to analyze other similar substances. All these methods are numbered from TO-1 to TO-14 and based on GC, GC/MS, and HPLC analytical techniques. Method numbers, sampling and analytical techniques, and the types of pollutants are outlined in Table 1, while individual substances are listed in Table 2. 

Recently, metapopulation models have been successfully applied to assess the risks of contaminants to aquatic populations. A metapopulation model to extrapolate responses of the aquatic isopod Asellus aquaticus as observed in insecticide-stressed mesocosms to assess its recovery potential in drainage ditches, streams, and ponds is provided by van den Brink et al. (2007). They estimated realistic pyrethroid concentrations in these different types of aquatic ecosystems by means of exposure models used in the European legislation procedure for pesticides. It appeared that the rate of recovery of Asellus in pyrethroid-stressed drainage ditches was faster in the field than in the isolated mesocosms. However, the rate of recovery in drainage ditches was calculated to be lower than that in streams and ponds (van den Brink et al. 2007). In another study, the effects of flounder foraging behavior and habitat preferences on exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in sediments were assessed by Linkov et al. (2002) using a tractable individual-based metapopulation model. In this study, the use of a spatially and temporally explicit model reduced the estimate of risk by an order of magnitude as compared with a nonspatial model (Linkov et al. 2002). 

When dealing with human tissues, experimental dosing or feeding is not possible. Determination of pesticides in human samples taken from individuals poisoned or occupationally exposed can provide information useful in development of analytical methodology. These types of samples may contain biologically incorporated pesticides and metabolites. If human tissue samples containing the pesticides of interest are not available, the researcher must rely on animal models for establishing recovery data for pesticides and metabolites. 

ELISA could potentially be used advantageously in many types of exposure and monitoring situations, for paraquat and other pesticides amenable to ELISA analysis. An obvious use of ELISA is the detection of pesticide residue levels in plant and animal tissues, or food extracts. Biological specimens such as plasma and urine currently analyzed by RIA seem particularly amenable to analysis by ELISA. Portable field kits could be developed to determine safe worker re-entry times into treated fields. Environmental samples such as soil, water, and air, can be analyzed by the ELISA. Pesticide conjugates have been proposed for skin testing of individuals suspected of sensitivity to pesticides (fi.) the ELISA could be used to detect specific antibodies in these individuals and aid in exposure studies. 

Antibodies have been raised against representative compounds from the major classes of pesticides. Although the ELISA will be useful for individual analysis of a wide variety of compounds, if one needed to analyze several different compounds simultaneously in one matrix immunoassay may not be the method of choice, due to the large amount of controls and standards needed. However, it could be successfully used for the rapid screening of a large number of samples for the presence of specific types of pesticides and for confirmatory tests (Ji). The work reported here with paraquat,... 

Indoor exposure assessments can be more complex than outdoor assessments. The indoor assessments are often complicated by the fact that pesticide application methods and their placement within the indoor environments are very diverse and include, for example, crack and crevice treatment, carpet treatment, room loggers, moth repellents, residual termiticides, disinfectants and pet products. This diversity also means that potential human contact with the residues may range from a low probability (crack and crevice treatment) to a higher probability (indoor broadcast treatment such as an indoor total release logger) because of the nature of the application and the variability in activities that may bring individuals in contact with treated areas. Furthermore, the varied characteristics of the source (e.g. formulation type, application methods, room of application and duration of emission) and the indoor residential environment (e.g. room size, air exchange rates, temperature and types of surfaces, such as carpet, upholstery, vinyl, etc.) significantly influence exposure pofenfial. 

Pesticide usage factors include those factors needed to characterize the amount of pesticide an individual is potentially exposed to each day, as well as the duration, frequency and interval of potential exposures. For example, for mixer/loaders/ applicators, this would include hectares typically treated per day, typical application rates, types of equipment used, and whether application is conducted by the farmer or a custom applicator. 

In recent years as more research has focused on the role of monounsaturates versus polyunsaturates and their effects on cholesterol reduction, oleic safflower oil has begun to receive more attention. In the United States, Saffola Grocery Products has introduced a grown-without-pesticides salad oil in which linoleic safflower oil has been replaced by the oleic type. In Japan, several bottlers have begun to feature oleic safflower oil in their gift-pack campaign both as an individually identified product and also in blends with the linoleic type. 

The actual trapping procedure to be used is a matter of individual preference, since there are many published procedures and commercial types available. The capillary-type trapping device (6, 7, 8) is appealingly simple, and the concentrated trapped pesticide is confined on the small inner surfaces of the tube from which it is quickly, easily, and, more important, eflBciently transferred to whichever infrared microsampling device is to be used. 

---