Performance evaluation practices assessment

On the basis of this risk assessment the transfer strategy is evaluated. For those transfers with lowest risk, method transfer will be limited to simple knowledge transfer as there is no added value in performing any practical transfer exercises i.e. transfer waiver. 

Dispenses information Is primary learning resource Stresses inquiry Groups students according to ability (norm- referenced) Focuses on information Evaluates via classroom testing Facilitates learning experience Allows participants to serve as learning resources Stresses practical application Tries to help all participants perform to specified level (criterion-referenced) Focuses on performance Evaluates via on-the-job performance assessment... 

Sadler B (1996) International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment, final report, environmental assessment in a changing world Evaluating practice to improve performance. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and Ae International Association for Impact Assessment, Minister of Supply and Services, Canada, p 248... 

Assessment of individual differences (or average response profiles for certain tasks) in applied environments generally seeks an empirically based answer to practical questions. Such objectives include monitoring and self-monitoring of performance, evaluation of mental and physical load and overload, selection and classification of personnel, detection of health risks, and evaluation of risk behavior. Especially when costly psychophysiological methods are involved, the empirical validity and, more importantly, the incremental validity (as compared to data already available) has to be discussed on theoretical grounds within the framework of cost-benefit analyses. 

Practice fields have had an uneasy existence in the academy where the printed word (or equation) is valued above all other forms of communication. Thus creative work that can be easily described in text is more easily understood, and evaluation of scholarship more easily assessed. But performance and practice are more challenging to assess, and to narrate. Yet the process of design and the making of work are what drive many students and faculty. The chance to examine, interrogate, and experience what it means to create is central to their research and scholarship. 

Application of the above principles and solutions in practice have come across with a problem of uncertainty with respect to achievable efficiency the latter is connected with necessity of quantification of the safety level. To evaluate and assess the achievable safety level, one has to perform the full-scale PSA in addition to deterministic principles. Common realisation of the deterministic and probabilistic analyses during the NVAES-2 design process has permitted to obtain optimal solution with respect to balance of the active and passive trains of the modular safety systems. As a result of this optimisation, total core melt frequency for NVAES-2 is about three orders of magnitude less than for unit 1 of Balakovo NPP with V-320 reactor plant. 

Ergonomics Laboratory at the Tallinn University of Technology has performed several risk assessments for companies in different industrial branches. It gives the researches a good basis to evaluate the data collected on their own as well as derived from NLI and draw conclusions taking into consideration several theoretical and practical factors which may deform the actual portrait of current situation in occupational health and safety in Estonia. 

Sgorou, E., Katsakiori, R, Goutsos, S. Manatakis, E. 2010. Assessment of selected safety performance evaluation methods in regards to their conceptual, methodological and practical characteristics. Safety Science 48(8) 1019-1025. 

The risk inventory or risk evaluation is die ne. t part of die hazard survey. It is not practical to expect the plan to cover every potential accident. When die hazards liave been evaluated, die plan should be focused on die most significant ones. This risk assessment stage requires die technical expertise of many people to compare die pieces of data and detennine die relevance of each. Among die important factors to be considered in performing die risk evaluation are die following ... 

When a tracer is considered, it is important to evaluate its performance with respect to these criteria, especially stability during exposure and storage/analysis. Normal practice involves conducting weathering tests where field collectors are treated with known amounts of the tracer and an assessment is made of weathering, extraction and storage stability under conditions pertaining to the intended use. The characteristics of the tracer allow it to be applied uniformly over the application area. Typically, application monitors are used to verify both the application rate and the uniformity of the application. 

There are two main types of proficiency testing scheme. First, there are those set up to assess the competence of a group of laboratories to undertake a very specific analysis, e.g. lead in blood or the number of asbestos fibres in air collected on membrane filters. Secondly, there are those schemes used to evaluate the performance of laboratories across a certain sector for a particular type of analysis. Because of the wide range of possible analyte/matrix combinations it is not practicable to assess the performance of laboratories when analysing all the possible sample types. Instead, a representative cross-section of analyses is chosen (e.g. determination of different pesticide residues in a range of foodstuffs or the determination of trace levels of metals in water samples). 

The next step, given that no relevant data can be found from any literature sources or from any internal files (and that it has been determined what data are needed or most likely to allow selection of desirable candidate compounds), is to perform appropriate predictive tests. The bulk of this section addresses the specifics of performing such evaluations using in vitro models. Before considering how to design, develop the components of, and conduct such a testing program, we must first consider how the practice of safety assessment came to its current state of acceptance and utilization of such tests. 

---