Parameters mass transfer coefficients

Earlier studies in mass transfer between the gas-liquid phase reported the volumetric mass-transfer coefficient kLa. Since kLa is the combination of two experimental parameters, mass-transfer coefficient and mterfacial area, it is difficult to identify which parameter is responsible for the change of kLa when we change the operating condition of a fermenter. Calderbank and Moo-Young (1961) separated kta by measuring interfacial area and correlated mass-transfer coefficients in gas-liquid dispersions in mixing vessels, and sieve and sintered plate column, as follows ... 

Of course, the fitting of the data can give rise to some compensation effects and the accuracy of the determination of the wetted areas (related to the topological description of the liquid flow on the catalyst) is limited by the knowledge of all the physico-chemical properties (vapour pressure, viscosities etc.) and of the correlated parameters (mass transfer coefficient etc...) involved in the model. 

Note that Eq. (18z56a) is very similar to Eq. (18=48b) except that c replaces the concentration of the pore fluid Cp j-e and the lunped parameter mass transfer coefficient l, replaces the film coefficient kf. As expected, the lunped parameter expressions using the single-porosity model are sirtpler. 

D13. We wish to use the local equilibrium model to estimate reasonable flow rates for the separation of dextran and fructose using an SMB. The isotherms are linear and both q and c are in g L. The linear equilibrium constants are dextran, 0.23 and fructose, 0.69. The interparticle void fraction = 0.4 and the intraparticle void fraction = 0.0. The columns are 40.0 cm in diameter. We want a feed flow rate of 1.0 L/min. The feed has 50.0 of each component. The desorbent is water and the adsorbent is silica gel. The columns are each 60.0 cm long. The limped parameter mass transfer coefficients using fluid concentration differences as the driving force are 2.84 l/min for both dextran and fructose. Operation is isothermal. Use multiplier values (see notation in Figure 18-14i of M] = 0.97, M2 = 0.99, M3 = 1.01, and M4 = 1.03. Determine the flow rates of desorbent, dextran product, fructose product, and recycle rate and find the ratio D/F. 

Possibilities for a single resistance include a linear rate expression with a lumped parameter mass transfer coefficient based either on the external fluid film or on a hypothetical solid film, depending on which film is controlling the rate of uptake of adsorbate. A quadratic driving force expression, again with a lumped parameter mass transfer coefficient, may be used instead. Alternatively, intraparticle diffusion, if the dominant form of mass transfer, may be described by the general diffusion equation (Pick s second law) with its appropriate boundary conditions, as described in Chapter 4. 

Under equiUbrium or near-equiUbrium conditions, the distribution of volatile species between gas and water phases can be described in terms of Henry s law. The rate of transfer of a compound across the water-gas phase boundary can be characterized by a mass-transfer coefficient and the activity gradient at the air—water interface. In addition, these substance-specific coefficients depend on the turbulence, interfacial area, and other conditions of the aquatic systems. They may be related to the exchange constant of oxygen as a reference substance for a system-independent parameter reaeration coefficients are often known for individual rivers and lakes. 

The mass-transfer coefficients depend on complex functions of diffii-sivity, viscosity, density, interfacial tension, and turbulence. Similarly, the mass-transfer area of the droplets depends on complex functions of viscosity, interfacial tension, density difference, extractor geometry, agitation intensity, agitator design, flow rates, and interfacial rag deposits. Only limited success has been achieved in correlating extractor performance with these basic principles. The lumped parameter deals directly with the ultimate design criterion, which is the height of an extraction tower. 

Three criteria for scale-up are that the laboratory and industrial units have the same mass-transfer coefficients /cg and E/cl and the same ratio of the specific interfacial surface and liquid holdup Tables 23-9 and 23-10 give order-of-magnitude values of some parameters that may be expected in common types of liquid/gas contactors. 

Two complementai y reviews of this subject are by Shah et al. AIChE Journal, 28, 353-379 [1982]) and Deckwer (in de Lasa, ed.. Chemical Reactor Design andTechnology, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp. 411-461). Useful comments are made by Doraiswamy and Sharma (Heterogeneous Reactions, Wiley, 1984). Charpentier (in Gianetto and Silveston, eds.. Multiphase Chemical Reactors, Hemisphere, 1986, pp. 104—151) emphasizes parameters of trickle bed and stirred tank reactors. Recommendations based on the literature are made for several design parameters namely, bubble diameter and velocity of rise, gas holdup, interfacial area, mass-transfer coefficients k a and /cl but not /cg, axial liquid-phase dispersion coefficient, and heat-transfer coefficient to the wall. The effect of vessel diameter on these parameters is insignificant when D > 0.15 m (0.49 ft), except for the dispersion coefficient. Application of these correlations is to (1) chlorination of toluene in the presence of FeCl,3 catalyst, (2) absorption of SO9 in aqueous potassium carbonate with arsenite catalyst, and (3) reaction of butene with sulfuric acid to butanol. 

Design of inorganic absorbers quite often involves a system whose major parameters are well defined such as system film control, mass transfer coefficient equations, etc. Ludwig gives design data for certain well-known systems sueh as NH3-Air-H20, CI2-H2O, COi in alkaline solutions, etc. Likewise, data for commercially available packings is well documented such as packing factors, HETP, HTU, etc. 

A pulse of a racemic mixture (5 g each enantiomer) was carried out to check the adsorption model and to predict the mass transfer coefficient. The other model parameters used in simulation were = 0.4 and Pe = 1000. The mass transfer coefficient used to fit experimental and model predictions in the pulse experiment was k = 0.4 s k Model and experimental results are compared in Figs. 9-16 and 9-17. 

Parameters a and b are related to the diffusion coefficient of solutes in the mobile phase, bed porosity, and mass transfer coefficients. They can be determined from the knowledge of two chromatograms obtained at different velocities. If H is unknown, b can be estimated as 3 to 5 times of the mean particle size, where a is highly dependent on the packing and solutes. Then, the parameters can be derived from a single analytical chromatogram. 

The plot of the rate of disappearance of CO per volume of liquid in the serum bottles versus partial pressure of CO in the gas phase based on (3.14.4.14) could give the constant slope value of KLa/H. Henry s constant is independent of the acetate concentration but it is only dependent on temperature. The overall volumetric mass transfer coefficient can be calculated based on the above assumption. The data for various acetate concentrations and different parameters were plotted to calculate the mass transfer coefficient. 

Table 3.1 shows the kinetic parameters for cell growth, rate models with or without inhibition and mass transfer coefficient calculation at various acetate concentrations in the culture media. The Monod constant value, KM, in the liquid phase depends on some parameters such as temperature, initial concentration of the carbon source, presence of trace metals, vitamin B solution, light intensity and agitation speeds. The initial acetate concentrations in the liquid phase reflected the value of the Monod constants, Kp and Kp. The average value for maximum specific growth rate (/xm) was 0.01 h. The value... 

Estimation of parameters. Model parameters in the selected model are then estimated. If available, some model parameters (e.g. thermodynamic properties, heat- and mass-transfer coefficient, etc.) are taken from literature. This is usually not possible for kinetic parameters. These should be estimated based on data obtained from laboratory expieriments, if possible carried out isothermal ly and not falsified by heat- and mass-transport phenomena. The methods for parameter estimation, also the kinetic parameters in complex organic systems, and for discrimination between models are discussed in more detail in Section 5.4.4. More information on parameter estimation the reader will find in review papers by Kittrell (1970), or Froment and Hosten (1981) or in the book by Froment and Bischoff (1990). 

It was shown later that a mass transfer rate sufficiently high to measure the rate constant of potassium transfer [reaction (10a)] under steady-state conditions can be obtained using nanometer-sized pipettes (r < 250 nm) [8a]. Assuming uniform accessibility of the ITIES, the standard rate constant (k°) and transfer coefficient (a) were found by fitting the experimental data to Eq. (7) (Fig. 8). (Alternatively, the kinetic parameters of the interfacial reaction can be evaluated by the three-point method, i.e., the half-wave potential, iii/2, and two quartile potentials, and ii3/4 [8a,27].) A number of voltam-mograms obtained at 5-250 nm pipettes yielded similar values of kinetic parameters, = 1.3 0.6 cm/s, and a = 0.4 0.1. Importantly, no apparent correlation was found between the measured rate constant and the pipette size. The mass transfer coefficient for a 10 nm-radius pipette is > 10 cm/s (assuming D = 10 cm /s). Thus the upper limit for the determinable heterogeneous rate constant is at least 50 cm/s. 

The PULSAR units are high efficiency static aerators that have been developed for municipal wastewater treatment plants and have successfully been used over extended periods of time without any operational problems such as unstable operation or plugging up during intermittent operation of the air pumps (Chourda-kis, 1999). Data have been collected from a pilot plant unit at the Wastewater Treatment plant of the Industrial Park (Herakleion, Crete). A series of experiments were conducted for the determination of the mass transfer coefficient (kLa) and are shown in Figure 17.4. The data are also available in tabular form as part of the parameter estimation input files provided with the enclosed CD. 

Instead of using a constant value of the mass transfer coefficient k at each pressure given by Harwell (Walley et al., 1973), Levy and Healzer (1980) developed an entrainment parameter p. GF and P are evaluated by solving the following two equations simultaneously ... 

Equation (5) is equivalent to stating that sublimation and subsequent transport of 1 g of water vapor into the chamber demands a heat input of 650 cal (2720 J) from the shelves. The vial heat transfer coefficient, Kv, depends upon the chamber pressure, Pc and the vapor pressure of ice, P0, depends in exponential fashion upon the product temperature, Tp. With a knowledge of the mass transfer coefficients, Rp and Rs, and the vial heat transfer coefficient, Kv, specification of the process control parameters, Pc and 7 , allows Eq. (5) to be solved for the product temperature, Tp. The product temperature, and therefore P0, are obviously determined by a number of factors, including the nature of the product and the extent of prior drying (i.e., the cake thickness) through Rp, the nature of the container through Kv, and the process control variables Pc and Ts. With the product temperature calculated, the sublimation rate is determined by Eq. (4). 

Steps 1 and 7 are highly dependent on the fluid flow characteristics of the system. The mass velocity of the fluid stream, the particle size, and the diffusional characteristics of the various molecular species are the pertinent parameters on which the rates of these steps depend. These steps limit the observed rate only when the catalytic reaction is very rapid and the mass transfer is slow. Anything that tends to increase mass transfer coefficients will enhance the rates of these processes. Since the rates of these steps are only slightly influenced by temperature, the influence of these processes... 

---