Parameter transferability

Statistical Parameters Transferring Site (RandD) Receiving Site (QC Production)... 

Of course, the rich information available from a QM/MM simulation does not come without cost. The QM/MM Claisen simulation required several million AMI calculations to be carried out while AMI is a very efficient level of QM theory for a molecule as small as allyl vinyl ether, that still represents an enormous investment of computational resources. As a result, the application of QM/MM methodologies based on the formalism of Eqs. (13.4) and (13.5) has tended not to be especially systematic, i.e., choices of QM and MM models and necessary coupling parameters have tended to be made on an ad hoc basis, without regarding parameter transferability as being an issue of paramount concern. 

It can be shown that three different modes of front propagation during the formation of polycaproamide can be observed, depending on the relationship between the process parameters. In the first mode, which was found experimentally, the zones of polymerization and crystallization coincide. In the second mode these zones are separated in space. The third mode, which was predicted theoretically, is characterized by a non-monotonic distribution of the degree of crystallinity. However, it is not clear whether this situation can actually be observed in anionic e-caprolactam polymerization because even slight variations in parameters transfers the system into another regime. 

Classical molecular simulation methods such as MC and MD represent atomistic/molecular-level modeling, which discards the electronic degrees of freedom while utilizing parameters transferred from quantum level simulation as force field information. A molecule in the simulation is composed of beads representing atoms, where the interactions are described by classical potential functions. Each bead has a dispersive pair-wise interaction as described by the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential, ULj(Ly) ... 

Gerloch and Woolley reformulated the AOM in a way that resolves some of the difficulties encountered with, for example, square planar CuCLi , but rejects parameter transferability. The LF parameters are determined from both optical and magnetic data, with SO coupling taken fully into account. The five-orbital model, which lies at the heart of LF theory is retained the d orbitals, it is argued, are not significantly involved in covalency and remain pure , albeit with expanded radial functions as a consequence of central-field covalence. 

For a set of simulated data it would be desirable to be able to process all the data using the same processing parameters, such as zero filling or window function. It is possible to define a limited number of processing parameters in NMR-SIM and have these parameters transferred directly to ID WIN-NMR or 2D WIN-NMR with the simulated experimental data. It is then possible to process the simulated data utilizing the parameters defined in NMR-SIM using all the standard processing commands in ID WIN-NMR and 2D WIN-NMR. 

The increased current tailing at longer times along with a shift of the current peak to longer times found in kMC simulations with low CO surface mobility, cf. Figure 2.4a, is characteristic for experimental transients on small nanoparticles ( 1.8 nm). Overall, the simulated transients capture all the essential features of experimental current transients. Analogous as for large nanoparticles, the model fits chronoamperometric current transients for various potentials and, thereby, explore effects of particle size and surface structure on rate constants, Tafel parameters (transfer coefficients), and equilibrium potentials. Due to the stochastic nature of the MC approach, systematic optimization of the fits is a much more delicate task. 

A study of the optical spectra of symmetrically and asymmetrically substituted ethylenediamine complexes of Ni with known structures by Lever et al is a good example of how AOM parameters can be derived from the spectra of low symmetric (rhombic) species and, additionally, allows one to check the concept of parameter transferability, e r Parameters for the Ni—N bond vs. the Ni—bond distance are depicted in Figure 4. Here, data for the Ni— NH3 bond reported for rran -[Ni(NH3)4(NCS)2] and [Ni(NH3)6] + are also included. With increasing steric... 

The disadvantages are the loss of the variational principle (one can obtain a total energy that is below the true total energy), the limited applicability (methods can only be applied to molecules containing elements that have been parametrized), and the danger of spurious results. There are no perfect semiempirical methods. They all can produce incorrect results, especially for molecular systems which are different from the structures used for parametrizations (the problem of parameter transferability). 

Multiscale simulation by parameter transfer from smaller to larger scale... 

Attempts Avere made recently to develop a set of deformation parameters, transferable between chemically similar molecules. Their application is much less time-consuming than a full electron density study and may give more realistic least-squares refinement (reduction of displacement parameters) and better predictions of molecular properties than the atomic approximation. 

---