Organization of This Report

BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement 

ANSI and AIHA. 2012. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems. ANSI/ AIHA/ASSE ZlO-2012. Falls Church, Va. 

Recommended Practice for Development ofaSafetyandEnvironment Management Program for Ojfshore Operations and Facilities, 3rd ed. API RP 75. Washington, D.C. BOEMRE. 2011. Process Guide Offshore Renewable Energy Installations, and Annexes 1-4, Version 1.0. July 27. 

Occupational Health and Safety Management. BS OHSAS 18001. London. 

The European Offshore Wind Industry Key 2011 Trends and Statistics. Jan. 2012. http //www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/ EWEA stats offshore 2011 02.pdf. Accessed Feb. 7, 2013. 

Robert A. Beaudet, Chair Committee on Review and Evalnation of Alternative Technologies for Demilitarization of Assembled Chemical Weapons Phase II 

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft mannscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report  

Steven Konkel, Eastern Kentucky University Richard Magee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Walter May, Consultant Ray McGuire, Consultant 

Vernon Myers, Environmental Protection Agency Headquarters 

George Parshall, E.I. du Pont de Nemours (retired) Robert Olson, Consultant 

Synonyms Jet fuel JP-8, kerosene, aviation kerosene, fuel oil no. 1, jet kerosene, turbo fuel A, straight-run kerosene, distillate fuel oil-light, MIL-T-83133B, AVTUR, NATO F-34 

Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (DiEGME) Ice inhibition 0.1 vol/vol % Required 

Metal deactivator Control of metal-catalyzed fuel deterioration 3 ppm Optional 

Source Major Tom Miller, U.S. Air Force, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. 

ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 2002. Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH. 

---

This introductory section describes the purpose, scope, and intended audience for this report discusses the definition and application of ecological risk assessment outlines the basic elements of the proposed framework and describes the organization of this report. 

The organization of this Report is similar to that of Volume 9. Cydopentadienyl and arene complexes containing metal-metal bonds, carbene, carbyne, and hydro-carbyl ligands, generally are not included (see Chapters 9—12) unless reactions of the title ligands are involved. Only those metalla-borane and -carbaborane complexes that contain a i-cyclopentadienyl-metal residue are described and crystal-structure determinations are included only where results of particular significance or solutions of structural problems are provided. 

Not all problems were solved, however, and different usages were encountered on the two sides of the Atlantic. A joint British-American committee was therefore set up, and in 1952 it published Rules for Carbohydrate Nomenclature [18]. This work was continued, and a revised version was endorsed in 1963 by the American Chemical Society and by the Chemical Society in Britain and published [19]. The publication of this report led the IUPAC Commission on Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry to consider the preparation of a set of IUPAC Rules for Carbohydrate Nomenclature. This was done jointly with the IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature, and resulted in the Tentative Rules for Carbohydrate Nomenclature, Part I, 1969 , published in 1971/72 in several journals [1]. It is a revision of this 1971 document that is presented here. In the present document, recommendations are designated 2-Carb-n, to distinguish them from the Carb-n recommendations in the previous publication. 

We are grateful to the organizers of this symposium for the opportunity to enlarge upon our reports of these investigations that have appeared in a wide variety of publications in the past,... 

The subsequent chapters of this report are organized on the basis of matrix (e.g., seawater versus sediment), as opposed to analyte or mea-... 

The purpose of this report is to summarize the key ideas and recommendations that were identified and discussed at the workshop. There has been no attempt to summarize each individual plenary lecture rather, the report is organized by key topic areas that emerged during the workshop. 

From MPOWER (World Health Organization 2008), Table la Data was not validated by country focal point in time for publication of this report Current smoking prevalence not vahdated. .. Data not available/not reported... 

A number of methodological questions which are essential for the outcome of this study arise as the objective of this report, to assess the environmental and resource use effects of organic farming, is approached ... 

So far, this report has largely been a synopsis of scientific evidence, but scientific findings are not necessarily the answer to policy relevant questions. A number of policy relevant questions are now raised in this section with respect to the environmental and resource use impacts of organic farming. Finally, it is discussed to which extent the outcome of this report can help answer these questions. 

The organic material accumulated from water and used for bioassays should be representative of that originally present in the water. As much unaltered material as possible should be accumulated. In this sense, the desire for effective accumulation is the same whether the organic mixture is to be separated for identification purposes or used directly for bioassays. The primary intent of this report is to describe some accumulation techniques which are applicable to bioassay requirements and to present preliminary results of bioassays performed on organic mixtures accumulated from drinking water. 

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Louis C. Glasgow, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the organizers and the institution. 

The purpose of this Report is to set forth the technical principles and framework for a comprehensive and risk-based hazardous waste classification system. In this context, waste is any material that has insufficient value to justify further beneficial uses, and thus must be managed at a cost. Hazardous waste is waste that can be harmful to biological organisms, due to the presence of radioactive substances or chemicals that are deemed hazardous, to the extent that it must be regulated. Hazardous waste excludes material that is simply useless (e.g., typical household trash). This work is comprehensive because it considers all hazardous wastes irrespective of their source.1... 

The experts do not agree, however, on specific details of the type of energy to be used, the source of the organic raw materials, the identity of the responsive chemical system, and the most suitable location on the early Earth for chemical self-organization. A consensus exists that some barrier is needed to protect the evolving entity from dispersal by diffusion, but the experts differ on the nature of the barrier. The committee can provide only a brief account of the more prominent suggestions here, and the listed references (and in some cases other sections of this report) should be consulted for more details. Some of the key variables are summarized below. 

The chemicals were divided into eight major pharmacologic classes and organized within each class according to structure. The most extensively studied classes are the anticholinergic and the anticholinesterase chemicals, and these are the subjects of this report the other classes will be reported on later. Panels were then formed to study these two main classes. The chairmen were selected for expertise in some aspect of the review of the pharmacologic class in question. 

---