Nebulisation pneumatic

ES ionisation can be pneumatically assisted by a nebulising gas a variant called ionspray (IS) [129]. ESI is conducted at near ambient temperature too high a temperature will cause the solvent to start evaporating before it reaches the tip of the capillary, causing decomposition of the analyte during ionisation and too low a temperature will allow excess solvent to accumulate in the sources. Table 6.20 indicates the electrospray ionisation efficiency for various solvents. 

The obvious alternative for the in-line flow-through cell in HPLC-FTIR is mobile-phase elimination ( transport interfacing), first reported in 1977 [495], and now the usual way of carrying out LC-FTIR, in particular for the identification of (minor) constituents of complex mixtures. Various spray-type LC-FTIR interfaces have been developed, namely, thermospray (TSP) [496], particle-beam (PB) [497,498], electrospray (ESP) [499] and pneumatic nebulisers [486], as compared by Som-sen et al. [500]. The main advantage of the TSP-based... 

As the vast majority of LC separations are carried out by means of gradient-elution RPLC, solvent-elimination RPLC-FUR interfaces suitable for the elimination of aqueous eluent contents are of considerable use. RPLC-FTTR systems based on TSP, PB and ultrasonic nebulisa-tion can handle relatively high flows of aqueous eluents (0.3-1 ml.min 1) and allow the use of conventional-size LC. However, due to diffuse spray characteristics and poor efficiency of analyte transfer to the substrate, their applicability is limited, with moderate (100 ng) to unfavourable (l-10pg) identification limits (mass injected). Better results (0.5-5 ng injected) are obtained with pneumatic and electrospray nebulisers, especially in combination with ZnSe substrates. Pneumatic LC-FI1R interfaces combine rapid solvent elimination with a relatively narrow spray. This allows deposition of analytes in narrow spots, so that FUR transmission microscopy achieves mass sensitivities in the low- or even sub-ng range. The flow-rates that can be handled directly by these systems are 2-50 pLmin-1, which means that micro- or narrow-bore LC (i.d. 0.2-1 mm) has to be applied. 

LC-APCI-MS is a derivative of discharge-assisted thermospray, where the eluent is ionised at atmospheric pressure. In an atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI) interface, the column effluent is nebulised, e.g. by pneumatic or thermospray nebulisation, into a heated tube, which vaporises nearly all of the solvent. The solvent vapour acts as a reagent gas and enters the APCI source, where ions are generated with the help of electrons from a corona discharge source. The analytes are ionised by common gas-phase ion-molecule reactions, such as proton transfer. This is the second-most common LC-MS interface in use today (despite its recent introduction) and most manufacturers offer a combined ESI/APCI source. LC-APCI-MS interfaces are easy to operate, robust and do not require extensive optimisation of experimental parameters. They can be used with a wide variety of solvent compositions, including pure aqueous solvents, and with liquid flow-rates up to 2mLmin-1. 

In ICP-AES and ICP-MS, sample mineralisation is the Achilles heel. Sample introduction systems for ICP-AES are numerous gas-phase introduction, pneumatic nebulisation (PN), direct-injection nebulisation (DIN), thermal spray, ultrasonic nebulisation (USN), electrothermal vaporisation (ETV) (furnace, cup, filament), hydride generation, electroerosion, laser ablation and direct sample insertion. Atomisation is an essential process in many fields where a dispersion of liquid particles in a gas is required. Pneumatic nebulisation is most commonly used in conjunction with a spray chamber that serves as a droplet separator, allowing droplets with average diameters of typically <10 xm to pass and enter the ICP. Spray chambers, which reduce solvent load and deal with coarse aerosols, should be as small as possible (micro-nebulisation [177]). Direct injection in the plasma torch is feasible [178]. Ultrasonic atomisers are designed to specifically operate from a vibrational energy source [179]. 

In Figure 8.12, the basic set-up of an ICP-MS instrument is presented as a block diagram, consisting of a sample introduction system, the inductively coupled argon plasma (ICP) and the mass-specific detector. By far the most commonly applied sample introduction technique is a pneumatic nebuliser, in which a stream of argon (typically 1 I.min ), expanding with high... 

The extension of inductively coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectrometry to seawater analysis has been slow for two major reasons. The first is that the concentrations of almost all trace metals of interest are 1 xg/l or less, below detection limits attainable with conventional pneumatic nebulisation. The second is that the seawater matrix, with some 3.5% dissolved solids, is not compatible with most of the sample introduction systems used with ICP. Thus direct multielemental trace analysis of seawater by ICP-AES is impractical, at least with pneumatic nebulisation. In view of this, a number of alternative strategies can be considered ... 

The early ESI interfaces were all optimised for flow rates between 1 and 10 fil/min. In trying to achieve direct compatibility with analytical HPLC, much development work has been done to accommodate higher flow rates and increase the efficiency of the nebulisation process. The present pneumatically assisted ESI interface is optimised around flow rates of 50-300 [lEmin. It is not the intention here to describe all the different manufacturers interfaces and source designs for API but the technology has been well documented [15]. 

The on-line interface of flow manifolds to continuous atomic spectrometric detectors for direct analysis of samples in liquid form typically requires a nebuliser and a spray chamber to produce a well-defined reproducible aerosol, whose small droplets are sent to the atomisation/ionisation system. A variety of nebulisers have been described for FAAS or ICP experiments, including conventional cross-flow, microconcentric or Babington-type pneumatic nebulisers, direct injection nebuliser and ultrasonic nebulisers. As expected, limits of detection have been reported to be generally poorer for the FIA mode than for the continuous mode. 

On-line coupling between a gas chromatograph and an atomic spectrometry detector is fairly simple. Typically, the output of the CG capillary column is connected to the entrance of the atomisation-ionisation system simply via a heated transfer line. When separation is performed by liquid chromatography (EC), the basic interface is straightforward a piece of narrow-bore tubing connects the outlet of the EC column with the liquid flow inlet of the nebuliser. Typical EC flow rates of 0.5-2 ml min are within the range usually required for conventional pneumatic nebulisation. 

M. Grotti, E. Magi and R. Frache, Multivariate investigation of matrix effects in inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry using pneumatic or ultrasonic nebulisation, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 15(1), 2000, 89-95. 

An atomic fluorescence spectrometric determination of selenium was first reported by Dagnall et al. [185] using a dispersive spectrometer equipped with an air-propane flame, giving a detection limit of 0.25 xg/ml of selenium on aspiration of aqueous solutions using a pneumatic nebuliser. Fluorescence from the 204 nm selenium resonance line was observed when the flame was irradiated by radiation from a selenium electrodeless discharge lamp, the optical axis of which was aligned at 90 °C to the optical axis of the monochromator. 

Schramel [103] discusses the conditions for multi-element analysis of over 50 trace elements, giving detection limits. Wolnik [104] described a sample introduction system that extends the analytical capability of the inductively coupled argon plasma/polychromator to include the simultaneous determination of six elemental hydrides along with a variety of other elements in plant materials. Detection limits for arsenic, bismuth, selenium and tellurium range from 0.5 to 3 ng/ml and are better by at least an order of magnitude than those obtained with conventional pneumatic nebulisers, whereas detection limits for the other elements investigated remain the same. Results from the analysis of freeze-dried crop samples and NBS standard reference materials demonstrated the applicability of the technique. Results obtained by the analysis of a variety of plant materials are presented in Table 7.10. 

A heated pneumatic nebuliser is used to produce the aerosol in APCI and the ions are produced by ion-molecule reactions initiated by corona discharges in the ion source region. White et al. (1998) found atmospheric pressure ionisation MS and LC-ICP-MS to be complementary techniques. 

In thermospray interfaces, the column effluent is rapidly heated in a narrow bore capillary to allow partial evaporation of the solvent. Ionisation occurs by ion-evaporation or solvent-mediated chemical ionisation initiated by electrons from a heated filament or discharge electrode. In the particle beam interface the column effluent is pneumatically nebulised in an atmospheric pressure desolvation chamber this is connected to a momentum separator where the analyte is transferred to the MS ion source and solvent molecules are pumped away. Magi and Ianni (1998) used LC-MS with a particle beam interface for the determination of tributyl tin in the marine environment. Florencio et al. (1997) compared a wide range of mass spectrometry techniques including ICP-MS for the identification of arsenic species in estuarine waters. Applications of HPLC-MS for speciation studies are given in Table 4.3. 

Figure 1 Schematic of the nebuliser reactor for the Cu-CI hydrolysis experiments. The pneumatic nebuliser is represented at the top of the reactor.

Figure 3 Effect of different Ar flow rates through the pneumatic nebuliser...

While possible to obtain satisfactory products with the pneumatic nebuliser, the experimental difficulties due to clogging and the strong dependence on many interrelated variables indicated that another type of atomiser should be investigated. An ultrasonic nozzle, in which high frequency electrical energy is converted into vibratory mechanical motion at the same frequency, was therefore examined. The ultrasonic nozzle was chosen because the average droplet size was small, about 25 microns, and... 

There are several different types of nebulisers available from local instrument suppliers (Figure 2.9). They are expensive due to the inert material used and precise engineering required to make them. The size of the hole for the gas outlet must be big enough to sustain the very high pressure required to force the sample solution to move violently and rapidly throughout the spray chamber and small enough to create a very high pressure. The two most commonly used nebulisers are pneumatic and ultrasonic. 

Pneumatic Concentric Nebuliser. The current design of the pneumatic concentric nebuliser is probably the most common type used. It consists of a concentric glass through which a capillary tube is fitted. The sample is drawn up from the spray... 

Figure 2.9 Overview of sample introduction methods and hyphenated techniques used in ICP-AES. (A) Pneumatic concentric (sometimes called the Meinhard nebuliser) (B) Babington (C) fritted disc (D) Hildebrand nebuliser (E) cross flow (G) standard ultrasonic nebuliser for aqueous and non-aqueous solvents (H) electro-thermal graphite ( ) electro-thermal carbon cup (K) graphite tip filament (L) laser ablation (M) hydride generation (P) flow injection...

---