Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Modeling distribution

All LEED data analysis must, however, rely on prior assumptions and model distributions and is, therefore, not really direct. Microscopic methods have the advantage of delivering directly the shape of the surface (domains, terraces, etc.) without any assumptions being made. [Pg.79]

If the molecule moves without hindrance in a rigid-walled enclosure (the free enclosure ), as assumed in free volume theories, then rattling back and forth is a free vibration, which could be considered as coherent in such a cell. The transfer time between opposite sides of the cell t0 is roughly the inverse frequency of the vibration. The maximum in the free-path distribution was found theoretically in many cells of different shape [74]. In model distribution (1.121) it appears at a > 2 and shifts to t0 at a - oo (Fig. 1.18). At y — 1 coherent vibration in a cell turns into translational velocity oscillation as well as a molecular libration (Fig. 1.19). [Pg.51]

A reactive transport model, as the name implies, is reaction modeling implemented within a transport simulation. It may be thought of as a reaction model distributed over a groundwater flow. In other words, we seek to trace the chemical reactions that occur at each point in space, accounting for the movement of reactants to that point, and reaction products away from it. [Pg.301]

Computations of the EPR line shape made in ref. 71 with the help of eqn. (18) for the model distribution functions f(R) that are frequently used in radiation chemistry, have shown that the shape of the wings of the EPR lines is far more sensitive to changes in the distribution functions of radical pairs over the distances than to changes in such a conventionally used parameter as the line width between the points of the maximum slope, A//p. Thus, to estimate the distances of tunneling and their variations in the course of a reaction it is necessary to analyze the shape of the wings of the EPR lines. [Pg.263]

Fig. 4 Modelled distribution of PM10 across Europe for 2007-2009 excluding mineral dust... Fig. 4 Modelled distribution of PM10 across Europe for 2007-2009 excluding mineral dust...
A match between model and test image can be established by choosing the best correlation between test and model distributions. Berwick and Lee (1998) suggest the use of phase matching of the Fourier transform of the object signature in % -space to establish a match between model and test image. [Pg.282]

The theory was tested with the aid of an ample data array on low-frequency magnetic spectra of solid Co-Cu nanoparticle systems. In doing so, we combined it with the two most popular volume distribution functions. When the linear and cubic dynamic susceptibilities are taken into account simultaneously, the fitting procedure yields a unique set of magnetic and statistical parameters and enables us to conclude the best appropriate form of the model distribution function (histogram). For the case under study it is the lognormal distribution. [Pg.469]

A widely-used model in this class is the direct-interaction with product repulsion (DIPR) model [173—175], which assumes that a generalised force produces a known total impulse between B and C. The final translational energy of the products is determined by the initial orientation of BC, the repulsive energy released into BC and the form of the repulsive force as the products separate. This latter can be obtained from experiment or may be assumed to take some simple form such as an exponential decay with distance. Another method is to calculate this distribution from the quasi-diatomic reflection approximation often used for photodissociation [176]. This is called the DIPR—DIP model ( distributed as in photodissociation ) and has given good agreement for the product translational and rotational energy distributions from the reactions of alkali atoms with methyl iodide. [Pg.381]

M. Kuno, D. P. Fromm, S. T. Johnson, A. Gallagher, and D. J. Nesbitt, Modeling distributed kinetics in isolated semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 67 125304 (2003). [Pg.355]

Description of the Model. Bois and Paxman (1992) produced a model that they used to explore the effect of exposure rate on the production of benzene metabolites. The model had three components, which described the pharmacokinetics of benzene and the formation of metabolites, using the rat as a model. Distribution and elimination of benzene from a five-compartment model, comprised of liver, bone marrow, fat, poorly perfused tissues, and well perfused tissues, made up the first component of the model. The five-compartment model included two sites for metabolism of benzene, liver and bone marrow. The bone marrow component was included for its relevance to human leukemia. Parameter values for this component were derived from the literature and from the previously published work of Rickert et al. [Pg.181]

The presence of other plants, such as tree or vine rows, or shelter belts, has a considerable influence on the distance that small spray droplets travel, or in the interception of spray in general. Modelling distribution of spray deposits in such environments is much more complex aud is not yet at a stage that it can be applied to operational situations. The usability to do so will lead to improvements in the deposition of spray within a spray area, as well as within the canopy, and it will be used to define spray drift interception. This could become an important part of spray mitigation management plans, especially relevant to the use in horticulture of relatively hazardous insecticides. [Pg.240]

Figure 4. Radial electron distribution of Pt/Gex (a) experimental distribution obtained by Fourier transform of X-ray scattering data (b) model distribution calculated for spherical clusters. Figure 4. Radial electron distribution of Pt/Gex (a) experimental distribution obtained by Fourier transform of X-ray scattering data (b) model distribution calculated for spherical clusters.
Fig. 10. Some monthly averaged observed distributions of atmospheric methane from the SAMS satellite, Jones and Pyle, near solstice conditions, compared to the model distribution for July by Solomon and Garcia. Light dashed arrows indicate the residual Eulerian stream function, showing the advection pattern. Fig. 10. Some monthly averaged observed distributions of atmospheric methane from the SAMS satellite, Jones and Pyle, near solstice conditions, compared to the model distribution for July by Solomon and Garcia. Light dashed arrows indicate the residual Eulerian stream function, showing the advection pattern.
Figure if.S Modeled distributions of nitrogen fixation in the worlds oceans. (A) From Moore et al. (2004) with permission. (B) From Deutsch et al. (2007) based on P draw-down with permission. [Pg.182]

Model distributions to show the relationship between the shape, width, and angular position, and examples illustrating the magnitude of the errors that can be Introduced in calculations of the tilt angle from (Sj) in the case of distributions of finite widths or of a bimodal character are given by C.P. Lafrance, A. Nabet, R.E. Prud homme and M. Pezolet, Can. J. Chem. 73 (1995) 1497. [Pg.362]

Sociocultural Model Distribution of Consumption Model Proscriptive Model... [Pg.417]

Keywords population balance modeling, distributed populations, virus replication, vaccine production, microcarrier cell culture. [Pg.133]

Table 4. Model distribution coefficients for As, (mol adsorbed/l) / (mol solute/1), on I mmol ferrihydrite for groundwater at Schuwacht. Table 4. Model distribution coefficients for As, (mol adsorbed/l) / (mol solute/1), on I mmol ferrihydrite for groundwater at Schuwacht.
Once the overall risk assessment model is constructed, it may be used to make predictions. Running a model and collecting the results is often referred to as a simulation. If there are statistical components to the model, the model may be run repeatedly using different random numbers to select values from the statistical distributions each time. This process is known as Monte-Carlo simulation. In public health models, distributions can be used to describe variability in populations or the uncertainty in a value, parameter, or model. Since uncertainty is ever present, the presence of distributions in the model that are intended to describe variability usually results in a two-dimensional (2D) distributional model, where one dimension represents population variability and another represents uncertainty in the outcome. To use the Monte-Carlo method to assimilate the results of the model, a 2D simulation may be used. A program written to accomplish this task will look something like this ... [Pg.1174]

In most applications more than one particle is observed. As each individual may have its own particle size, methods for data reduction have been introduced. These include the particle-size distribution, a variety of model distributions, and moments (or averages) of the distribution. One should also note that these methods can be extended to other particle attributes. Examples include pore size, porosity, surface area, color, and electrostatic charge distributions, to name but a few. [Pg.2250]

Model Distribution While a PSD with n intervals is represented by 2n + 1 numbers, further data reduction can be performed by fitting the size distribution to a specific mathematical model. The logarithmic normal distribution or the logarithmic normal probability function is one common model distribution used for the distribution density, and it is given by... [Pg.2251]

Other model distributions used are the normal distribution (Laplace-Gauss), for powders obtained by precipitation, condensation, or natural products (e.g., pollens) the Gates-Gaudin-Schuh-mann distribution (bilogarithmic), for analysis of the extreme values of fine particle distributions (Schuhmann, Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng., Tech. Paper 1189 Min. Tech., 1940) or the Rosin-Rammler-Sperling-Bennet distribution for the analysis of the extreme values of coarse particle distributions, e.g., in monitoring grinding operations [Rosin and Rammler,/. Inst. Fuel, 7,29-36 (1933) Bennett, ibid., 10, 22-29 (1936)]. [Pg.2251]

The main processes governing the pharmacokinetics of a chemical are absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. In PBPK models, distribution of a chemical is characterized by blood flow rates to each organ and tissue, and partitioning of the chemical between tissue and blood. These processes are commonly modeled using two alternative types of assumptions flow-Umited and diffusion-limited transport. The flow-limited assumption implies that equilibration between free and bound fractions in blood and tissue is rapid, and that concentrations of the chemical in the venous blood exiting a tissue and in the tissue are at equilibrium. The tissue is assumed to be a homogeneous... [Pg.1072]

In the traditional MPF model, distribution of paper documents and physical, contact-based customer service accounted for more than 30% of total cost. Moving to digital distribution and document management is expected to significantly reduce distribution cost. [Pg.2]

Digital Distribution In the old model, distribution of paper-based documents accounted for more than 30% of the total service cost. In the e-MPF model, all transactions and instructions are made in electronic form, which substantially reduces distribution cost. [Pg.12]


See other pages where Modeling distribution is mentioned: [Pg.139]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.2243]    [Pg.109]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.83 , Pg.84 , Pg.85 ]




SEARCH



ADME (absorption, distribution computational models

ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism modeling

Absorption, distribution, metabolism experimental models

Absorption, distribution, metabolism model validation

Absorption, distribution, metabolism preclinical models

Affinity distribution models

Anderson-Schulz-Flory distribution model

Angular distributions rotating linear model

Animal models lead distribution

Animal models tissue distribution

Attrition rate distribution model

Axially distributed models of blood-tissue exchange

Axially distributed transport modeling

B Model Functions for Size Distributions

Bernoullian model sequence distributions

Bi-model distribution

Biophase distribution model

Boltzmann distribution, modelling

Branch distribution model

Charge distribution model

Charge distribution model, adsorption

Charge distribution, modelling

Charge distribution, semiempirical molecular orbital modeling

Compartment model with gamma-distributed elimination flow rate

Competitive Gaussian distribution model

Continuous models Gaussian distribution

Continuous models normal distribution

Controller design distributed model-based

D-strain modeled as a rhombicity distribution

Definition distributed reactivity model

Diffuse layer model distribution coefficient

Director distribution modeling

Discrete phase, bimodal distribution models

Discrete probability distributions model systems

Disordered structure models distribution

Dispersion model distribution

Dispersion models, mixing residence-time distribution

Distributed Constants Models

Distributed Element Model

Distributed component object model

Distributed component object model (DCOM

Distributed dipole model

Distributed electrode model

Distributed model examples

Distributed model, simplest

Distributed moment analysis potential models

Distributed multipole electrostatic models

Distributed parameter model

Distributed reactivity model

Distribution Functions in the Ising Model

Distribution constant model determination

Distribution functional group model

Distribution models

Distribution models

Distribution of Uranium in the Body (Biokinetic Models)

Distribution pore size model

Distributions of formation energies - the weak bond model

Distributions, selection random-effects models

Distributive properties model

Drop size distribution population balance modeling

Drug distribution bilayer model

Drug distribution multicompartmental models

Drug distribution pharmacokinetic modeling

Effect-distribution model

Empirical Distribution Models

Equivalent circuit distributed model

FIGURE 6.13 Use of a p-box to represent uncertainty between models I and II summarized as distribution functions

Fermi model distribution

Finite element modelling of flow distribution in an extrusion die

First-order Markov model sequence distributions

Flory distribution model

Fully Inhomogeneous Charge Distributions and Disordered Polymer Models

Gamma distribution models

Gaussian distribution models

General impedance models for distributed electrode processes

Glassy polymers site distribution model

Impulsive reaction model angular distributions

Income-distribution demand-shift model of inflation

Instantaneous absorption models distribution

Kinetic parameter distribution error model

Kinetic parameter distribution system model

Mathematical dynamic model development particle distribution

Mathematical models particle size distribution

Model Predicting Energy Requirement and Product Size Distribution

Model covariate distribution

Model distributed

Model distributed

Model for the overall residence time distribution

Model multivariate distribution

Model particle size distribution, protein

Model to Simulate Bubble Size Distribution

Model univariate distribution

Modeling Bubble Size Distribution

Modeling catalyst distribution

Modeling of distributions

Modeling pair distribution function

Modeling probability distributions

Modeling residence-time distribution

Modelling temperature distribution

Models charge distribution multisite complexation

Models with 32 Radial Distribution Function Values and Eight Additional Descriptors

Models with Any Geometry and Conductivity Distribution

Models, crystallization process crystal size distribution

Molecular modeling technique distribution

Molecular weight distribution modeling

Multiple-bubble-size models distribution

Multivariate models, random variables distributions

Nuclear Charge Density Distribution Models

PET-Measurements of Tracer Distribution in the Model Soil Column

Pair distribution function complex modeling

Pair distribution function structural modeling

Parallel distributed processing models

Partial pressure distribution model

Particle size distribution modeling

Particle size distribution population balance model

Plug flow, mixing model residence-time distribution

Population balance models, drop size distribution

Pore network modelling porosity distributions

Pore size distribution model silica glasses

Probability distribution models

Probability distribution models continuous

Probability distribution models discrete

Probability model Bernoulli distribution

Product energy distribution impulsive model

Quantum mechanical model probability distribution

Quasi-Probability Distribution Models

Radial distribution model

Radon decay products modeling size distributions

Random distribution, Flory model

Residence time distribution dispersion model

Residence time distributions models

Residence-time Distribution and Models for Macromixing in the Reactors

Residence-time distribution models for

Residence-time distributions maximum mixedness model

Residence-time distributions segregation model

Resolution peak distribution models

Retention-Time Distribution Models

Schulz-Zimm distribution model

Self-consistent field method reaction model, charge distribution

Significance of Modeling the Current Distribution

Simple model degree distributions

Size distribution models for

Spatially distributed systems and reaction-diffusion modeling

Species distribution model

Species sensitivity distribution model

Steady State Models for Isothermal Heterogeneous Distributed Systems

Structural-dynamical model distributions

Temperature distribution model

The Normal Distribution Model

The Simplest Distributed Model

Tolerance distribution model, risk

Tolerance distribution models

Tracer distribution models

Tracer distribution models combined

Two-compartment model of distribution

Univariate models, random variables distributions

© 2024 chempedia.info