Quasi-Probability Distribution Models

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is captured by the fact there are many different choices for/(0,x). Equivalently, the quantum-classical correspondence is not unique this is why, for example, there are two (and even more) equivalent forms for the kinetic energy (Equations 1.47 and 1.48). All/(0,x) that are consistent with Equation 1.54 provide a suitable classical correspondence the most popular choice,y(0,T) = 1, corresponds to the Wigner quasi-probability distribution function.  

Given a quasi-probability distribution function, the electron density and the momentum density are given by 

If one can model the quasi-probability distribution function using the electron density, then the kinetic energy can be expressed using °  

This approach to derive kinetic energy functionals was pioneered by Anderson et al., Ayers et al., Ghosh and Berkowitz, and Lee and Parr. The Thomas-Fermi model and generalizations thereto have been derived using this approach. 

---

Figure 7.8 For the unit-diameter hard sphere fluid at p = 0.277, comparison of the Poisson distribution (solid curve) with primitive quasi-chemical distribution Eq. (7.27) (dashed curve). This is the dense gas thermodynamic suggested in Fig. 4.2, p. 74, and the dots are the results of Monte Carlo simulation (Gomez et al, 1999). The primitive quasi-chemical default model depletes the probability of high- and low- constellations and enhances the probability near the mode.

The best method of modelling this behaviour is using a model called diagonal quasi-independence, and corresponds to a probability mixture model in which with probability a, the loops lengths are constrained to be the same, and with probability (1-a), they are independent. This method gives the relationship shown below, where Nik is the predicted count with first loop length i and third loop length k, (3 - and (3y are the two independent distributions. 

The model of the operation process of the complex technical system with the distinguished their operation states is proposed in (Kolowrocki Soszynska, 2008). The semi-markov process is used to construct a general probabilistic model of the considered complex industrial system operation process. To construct this model there were defined the vector of the probabilities of the system initial operation states, the matrix of the probabilities of transitions between the operation states, the matrix of the distribution functions and the matrix of the density functions of the conditional sojourn times in the particular operation states. To describe the system operation process conditional sojourn times in the particular operation states the uniform distribution, the triangular distribution, the double trapezium distribution, the quasi- trapezium distribution, the exponential distribution, the WeibuU s... 

The process of intersite electron hopping has been discussed in terms of a quasi-diffusional process. We now take a more detailed view of the intersite electron transfer reaction in a fixed-site redox polymer. The approach adopted here is due to Fritsch-Faules and Faulkner. These researchers developed a microscopic model to describe the electronhopping diffusion coefficient Z>e in a rigid three-dimensional polymer network as a function of the redox site concentration c. The model takes excluded volume effects into consideration, and it is based on a consideration of probability distributions and random-walk concepts. The microscopic approach was adopted by these researchers to obtain parameters that could be readily understood in the context of the polymer s molecular architecture. A previously published related approach was given by Feldberg. ... 

The equations (4.84, 85) and their solutions are based on the approximation (4.83) which is valid for a uni-modal probability distribution only. Contrary to this assumption, however, any initially uni-modal distribution can be expected to develop first into the doubled-peaked quasi-stationary solution Pqs (n) shown in Fig. 4.10 and then to go over finally to the exact stationary solution, that of an extinct population. Consequently deviations of the true time paths of (n), and o t) from those described by (4.84, 85) are to be expected. A calculation of the development of a model population with time with the exact master equation (4.63) and with the parameters A = 0.5, n = 0.2, and bi = 0.01 confirms this expectation (Figs. 4.11, 12). The Fig. 4.11 shows the exactly calculated change with time of a distribution which starts as normal distribution but soon develops into the form of the bimodal quasi-stationary distribution Pqs(n). In Fig. 4.12 and for the same model parameters the exact paths of the mean value (n)(and the variance a t) are compared with the paths obtained by solving the approximate equations (4.84, 85). 

The difference between model and calculation undoubtedly comes from the effect of the free interface, which was not taken into account here. This model also lacks the interactions between bubbles in reality, the rising bubbles collide with each other and then lose kinetic energy. The numerous collisions between quasi-rigid bubbles probably explain the widening of the plume seen in fig. 11. Moreover, the numerical model did not take into account the interactions that might exist between the bubbles in the plume and those at the sparger outlet. Nor did the model take into account bubble diameter distribution. This poor description of a plume is not related to EA. 

---