Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effect-distribution model

The bimodal pore distribution model used by Gibilaro et aL may also be used to analyze the results of this type of experiment. If it is assumed that all extraneous effects due to mixing in the interstices between the pellets have been eliminated by means of a control experiment, the results corresponding to equations (10.39) and (10.40) are now... [Pg.107]

There have been many modifications of this idealized model to account for variables such as the freezing rate and the degree of mix-ingin the liquid phase. For example, Burton et al. [J. Chem. Phy.s., 21, 1987 (1953)] reasoned that the solid rejects solute faster than it can diffuse into the bulk liquid. They proposed that the effect of the freezing rate and stirring could be explained hy the diffusion of solute through a stagnant film next to the solid interface. Their theoiy resulted in an expression for an effective distribution coefficient k f which could be used in Eq. (22-2) instead of k. [Pg.1991]

This relationship was further clarified by van de Waterbeemd in the two-step distribution model [588-590], Eater, the model was expanded by van de Waterbeemd and colleagues to include the effects of ionization of molecules, with the use of log Kd, in place of log Kp, as well as the effects of aqueous pores [49,54],... [Pg.156]

More recently, Saez et al. [27] have carried out numerical simulations to characterize the ultrasonic field propagation and to obtain the spatial distribution of the mechanical effects. The model is based on the assumption of linear wave propagation in a homogeneous media and the results are based on the solution of the... [Pg.46]

Kowaliw et al.6 presented a new model of AE, Deval. Deval has been shown to be capable of evolving plane trusses, that is, evolving designs of structure that are stable, capable of effectively distributing external forces, and also optimizing other constraints imposed by a fitness function. [Pg.306]

Several investigations (8.9 show, that the effective distribution coefficient can be described as a function of the growth rate. Own experiments show that a model to calculate the purity in dependence of the real growth rate is rather realistic. To considerate irregularities by the calculation of k ff, the effective distribution coefficient is presented as a function of the ideal growth rate of the crystal layer V, 3 and the growth rate deviation dy. ... [Pg.213]

Contact Time Distribution Models. To overcome this difficulty and still use the information given by the RTD, models were proposed which assumed that faster gas stayed mainly in the bubble phase, the slower in the emulsion. Gilliland and Knudsen (1971) used this approach and proposed that the effective rate constant depends on the length of stay of the element of gas in the bed, thus... [Pg.453]

Reliable chronic toxicity data were available for 21 species of plants (13 phytoplankton and 8 macrophytes) and 15 species of animals. The species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for atrazine chronic toxicity (no observed effect concentrations [NOECs]) to plants and animals are shown in Figure 4.4. A log-normal distribution model was fitted to each SSD by least-squares regression. [Pg.64]

SSDs are being routinely used for the display and interpretation of effects data (Parkhurst et al. 1996 Posthuma et al. 2002). An SSD for atrazine (shown in Figure 7.3) displays the typical S-shaped curve associated with many chemical dose-response relationships. Each point on the curve represents an LC50 for a particular species exposed to atrazine under standard toxicity test protocols. The SSD approach uses only a single statistically derived endpoint from each available toxicity test (e.g., the LC50 or EC50). In contrast, all data collected during any specific toxicity test can be used in a hierarchical model. The ability to use all available data to make inferential decisions is a marked improvement over the standard SSD effects distribution. [Pg.131]

There may be several reasons for this pattern to be observed. One obvious reason is distribution, i.e. the drug needs time to reach its site of action, and the time lag between the measured drug concentration in plasma and the drug effect is due to distributional delay. In order to describe such a plasma concentration-effect relationship, a PK-PD model that allows for drug distribution to the site of action, e.g. the effect compartment model may be used. [Pg.170]

Mechanistic models can describe pharmacological and physiological events in a more refined fashion and with greater utility than empirical models. Such models make more advanced and more realistic assumptions about drug distribution and effects. Mechanistic models may be used to find optimal sampling times during clinical trial design and to model clinical trial outcomes. The application... [Pg.176]

Calculations of the variations expected in the fluorescent-yield (FY) profiles as a function of the distribution model parameters are shown in Figure 7.19. When the species of interest resides predominantly at the solid surface, the FY profile shows a maximum at the critical angle for total external reflection. As the ratio of the surface-bound species to the total number of species in the solution volume adjacent to the surface decreases, the FY distribution broadens at the low angles. A similar effect is noted when a diffuse layer accumulation arises due to an interfacial electrostatic potential. [Pg.497]

Orientation Once the particles are dispersed in the polymer, they must be oriented so that the flat surface of the clay is parallel to the surface of the packaging material to maximize the barrier effect. Several models have been developed in order to describe the mass transfer within the nanocomposites. Most models assume that the platelets have a regular and uniform shape (rectangular, sanidic, or circular) and form a regular array in space. They are either parallel to each other or have a distribution of orientations, with the... [Pg.54]

The actual reaction rate according to the distribution model with zero order is (4/3) r (R3-Rq)1c0. The rate without the diffusion limitation is (4/3)tt R3/c0. Therefore, the effectiveness factor, the ratio of the actual reaction rate to the rate if not slowed down by diffusion, is... [Pg.58]

When the rate of diffusion is very slow relative to the rate of reaction, all substrate will be consumed in the thin layer near the exterior surface of the spherical particle. Derive the equation for the effectiveness of an immobilized enzyme for this diffusion limited case by employing the same assumptions as for the distributed model. The rate of substrate consumption can be expressed by the Michaelis-Menten equation. [Pg.64]


See other pages where Effect-distribution model is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.596]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



Distribution models

Model distributed

Modeling distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info