Model ecosystem discussion

An ecosystem can be thought of as a representative segment or model of the environment in which one is interested. Three such model ecosystems will be discussed (Figures 1 and 2). A terrestrial model, a model pond, and a model ecosystem, which combines the first two models, are described in terms of equilibrium schemes and compartmental parameters. The selection of a particular model will depend on the questions asked regarding the chemical. For example, if one is interested in the partitioning behavior of a soil-applied pesticide the terrestrial model would be employed. The model pond would be selected for aquatic partitioning questions and the model ecosystem would be employed if overall environmental distribution is considered. 

Extrapolation used to infer toxicity from one type of exposure regimen to another is often termed temporal extrapolation. The most common of these extrapolations is that from acute to chronic exposures, but the issue of pulsed versus continuous exposure is also important in assessing possible effects in real-world environmental settings. These extrapolations may involve the use of modified tests with standard species or whole-model ecosystems to simulate realistic exposures such as those of variable duration or those of pulsed exposure for compounds that rapidly dissipate in the environment. In many cases, these involve alterations in exposure route and intensity, both of which can have significant impacts on the toxic responses. Extrapolation from acute responses to NOECs or chronic responses is particularly important as chronic tests are more costly and time-consuming than acute tests. Methods for accurate and precise acute-to-chronic extrapolations have been developed and are available as computer programs such as ACE (Mayer et al. 1999, 2001 De Zwart 2002 Ellersieck et al. 2003) and are discussed in Chapter 6. 

Experimental aquatic ecosystems have become widely used tools in ecotoxicology because they allow for a greater degree of control, replication, and repeatability than is achievable in natural ecosystems. The test systems in use vary from small indoor microcosms to large and complex outdoor experimental ecosystems. However, natural freshwater systems may also vary considerably in size and ecological complexity. Before addressing the spatial extrapolation of results of model ecosystem experiments that were conducted on different localities, the possible influence of the size and ecological complexity of test systems on responses to chemical stress will be discussed. 

A global representation of the P cycle, by necessity, will be general. It will combine a wide variety of P-containing components into relatively few reservoirs and will parameterize intricate processes and feedback mechanisms into simple first-order transfers. To appreciate the rationale behind the construction of such a model and to understand its limitations, the transfers of P within a hypothetical terrestrial ecosystem and in a generalized ocean system will be discussed first. 

Two further examples are treated in terms of corresponding flow-models and their related DIFFs in Section 5. These are the relationship between dietary and body protein nitrogen and the influence of water stress, and the usefulness of DIFFs for discussing fractionation within ecosystems for both N and C. 

The first section explains the concepts of EIA and RA and the existing approaches to their integration. This is followed by an analysis of the current situation with ecological input into EIA and discussion on how the formal EcoRA framework provides for site-specific ecosystem risk assessment. The subsequent section reviews the CLL approach and its applicability for assessing ecological effects in EIA. Finally, a model for assessment of ecosystem risks within EIA using the CLL approach is proposed. 

By now, it has not been made possible to determine the levels of antimicrobials that can cause an increase of primarily resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the gut of the consumer. As a result, measuring the microbial significance of antimicrobial residues continues to be the subject of considerable discussion. Much of the discussion involves the development of model systems that will reflect the effects of residue levels of antimicrobials on human intestinal microbial populations. The consensus of opinion at a recent symposium is that no such single system is available (64). The human intestine is a very complex microbial ecosystem, about which little is known of the effects of antimicrobial residues on the population dynamics and biochenoical responses (65). 

The expense of such multifactor experiments has led scientists to use process-based ecosystem models (see the discussion of terrestrial carbon models below) to predict the response of terrestrial ecosystems to future climates. When predicting the effects of CO2 alone, six global biogeochemical models showed a global terrestrial sink that began in the early part of the twentieth century and increased (with one exception) towards the year 2100 (Cramer et al., 2001). The maximum sink varied from 4 PgC yr to —10 PgC yr. Adding changes in climate (predicted by the Hadley Centre) to these models reduced the future sink (with one exception), and in one case reduced the sink to zero near the year 2100. 

Italian general legislation on EIA is modelled on EC Directive 85/337. The application of PEPAT as lex specialis, instead of any other general and incompatible rule, is beyond any discussion. PEPAT aims at enhancing the protection of the very particular Antarctic ecosystem. Its provisions on EIA apply to human activities which prevalently take place in the Antarctic Treaty area and can produce adverse impacts on the Antarctic environment and its dependent and associated ecosystems. 

In addition to providing estimates of risks, simulation models also can be useful in discussing the results of the risk characterization to the risk manager. This dialogue is particularly effective when the relationship between risks to certain measurement endpoints and the assessment endpoint are not readily apparent (e.g., certain indirect effects and large-scale ecosystem-level disturbances). 

Embedded in the circulation model, it provides a coupled physical-biogeochemical model of the Baltic Sea ecosystem as an example application. Several applications of the model system are discussed, covering process studies, such as currents in the western Baltic, river plumes, and sediment transport, but also long-term simulations of the ecosystem dynamics. 

The value of EF as indicator also for chemical production lies in the explicit indication that the ecosystem has a value equivalent to its ecological yield valued as it would be on commodity markets for the value of water, wood, fish or game that is purified or nurseried or generated or harbored in that ecosystem. Thus, a price can be put on the natural capital of an ecosystem based on the price of natural resources it yields each year. Therefore, EF provides the basis to estimate the ecological cost of production of a chemical that should be added to the industrial cost to develop an intrinsic cost that considers not only the product itself but also how it is produced. In Chapter 1 the need for a new model of global economy, which includes sustainability and ecosystem valuation in the value of goods, has already been discussed. 

Describe European models for calculation of critical loads at terrestrial ecosystems. Pay attention to discussing a critical load function. 

Describe the critical load models for aquatic ecosystem. Emphasize your attention on interactions of heavy metals between water and bottom sediment compartments. Discuss the application of small catchment approach for CL calculation. 

---