Environmental distribution

Information on application pattern of the chemical, sphere of entry (atmosphere, hydrosphere, etc.), and the estimate of rate of environmental release is required. 

If the use pattern indicates no entry into the environment leading to negligible EEC, no further testing is required. 

If the chemical is an insoluble polymer, then interactions associated with the solid waste disposal as landfill or incineration should be investigated. 

Interaction with suspended solids, sediments, and transformation is possible and should be assessed. 

Distribution profile of the chemical in air, water, fish, and sediment is calculated. 

---

Scheringer M. 1997. Characterization of the environmental distribution behavior of organic chemicals by means of persistence and spatial range. Environ Sci Tech 31(10) 2891-2897. 

Another factor that can influence the environmental distribution of a chemical is the presence of charged groups. Some pollutants, such as the sodium or potassium salts of phenoxyalkanoic herbicides, dinitrophenols, and tetra- or penta-chlo-rophenol, exist as anions in solution. Others, such as the bipyridyl herbicides diquat and paraquat, are present as cations. In either case, the ions may become bound to organic macromolecules or minerals of soils or sediments that bear the opposite... 

Koeman, J.H. and Pennings, J.H. (1970). An orientational survey on the side effects and environmental distribution of dieldrin in a tse-tse control in S.W. Kenya. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 5, 164—170. 

Muller JA, BM Rosner, G von Abendroth, G Meshulam-Simon, PL McCarty, AM Spormann (2004) Molecular identification of the catabolic vinyl chloride reductase from Dehalococcoides sp. Strain VS and its environmental distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol 70 4880-4888. 

J. Morris, D. F. Donnelly, E. O Neill, F. McConnell, and F. O Gara, F. Nucleotide sequence analysis and potential environmental distribution of a ferric pseudobactin receptor gene of Pseudomonas sp. strain Ml 14. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242 9 (1994). J. M. Raaijmakers, W. Bitter, H. L. M. Punte, P. A. H. M. Bakker, P. J. Weisbeek, and B. Schippers, Siderophore receptor PupA as a marker to monitor wild-type Pseudomonas piitida WCS358 in natural environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 1184 (1994). 

Two classes of mathematical models have been developed those which are specific and attempt to describe the transport and degradation of a chemical in a particular situation and those which are general or "evaluative" and attempt to generally classify the behavior of chemicals in a hypothetical environment. The type of modeling discussed here, equilibrium partitioning models, fall into the latter category. Such models attempt, with a minimum of information, to predict expected environmental distribution patterns of a compound and thereby identify which environmental compartments will be of primary concern. 

The advantages of developing such correlations is that once any of the parameters is known it is then a simple process to estimate the others. This is particularly useful in early evaluation of chemical partitioning in the environment. From a limited amount of information on a chemical, for example, its vapor pressure, water solubility and melting point, other partitioning parameters can be estimated and used in simple ecosystem models to evaluate the chemical s expected environmental distribution. 

An ecosystem can be thought of as a representative segment or model of the environment in which one is interested. Three such model ecosystems will be discussed (Figures 1 and 2). A terrestrial model, a model pond, and a model ecosystem, which combines the first two models, are described in terms of equilibrium schemes and compartmental parameters. The selection of a particular model will depend on the questions asked regarding the chemical. For example, if one is interested in the partitioning behavior of a soil-applied pesticide the terrestrial model would be employed. The model pond would be selected for aquatic partitioning questions and the model ecosystem would be employed if overall environmental distribution is considered. 

Landrigan PJ Mount Sinai School of Medicine of CUNY, New York, NY Lead and organochlorines in New York City study the current urban sources, environmental distribution and toxic effects on human health of lead and persistent chlorinated hydrocarbons—in particular PCBs and DDT National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences... 

Superfund Hazardous Substances Basic Research Program to study the current urban sources, environmental distribution, and toxic effects on human health of lead... 

Cohen Y, Cooter EJ (2002) Multimedia environmental distribution of toxics (Mend-Tox). I. Hybrid compartmental-spatial modeling framework. Pract Periodical Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste Manag 6(2) 70-86... 

The research published in this book uses the presently most comprehensive multicompartment model, the first which comprises a coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model (GCM). GCMs are the state-of-the-art tools used in climate research. The study is on the marine and total environmental distribution and fate of two chemicals, an obsolete pesticide (DDT) and an emerging contaminant (perflu-orinated compound) and contains the first description of a whole historic cycle of an anthropogenic substance, i.e. from the introduction into the environment until its fading beyond phase-out. 

Environmental distribution After 40 years of continuous application of DDT to vegetation (80%) and soil (20%), 73% of the total mass present in the environment in December 1990 are stored in soil, 24 % in the ocean, 2 % in vegetation, and less than one percent in the atmosphere (Table 3.2).The high storage in soil is caused by its strong absorptive capacity of organochlorine compounds, which is related to its organic matter content. The only source of DDT and DDE in the ocean is deposition... 

Sabljic, A. (1987b) Nonempirical modeling of environmental distribution and toxicity of major organic pollutants. In QSAR in Environmental Toxicology - II. Kaiser, K.L.E., Ed., pp. 309-332, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands. 

A single sample was not sufficient to understand the environmental distribution of PCBs. 

As observed in mammalian models, the immune system of fishes is a sensitive target organ system to evaluate toxicity. For a more thorough review of environmental immunotoxicology in fishes, with reference to specific classes of xenobiotics, readers are referred to several reviews that deal with the subject over a span of nearly three decades [45-47, 54-57], While fish in the environment may be exposed to a variety of xenobiotics, the most frequently investigated xenobiotics are the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) due to the presence and activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in fish, and heavy metals due to their ubiquitous environmental distribution. 

Despite these reservations, environmental distribution values may be considered valid for the sorption process, to a first approximation. On this basis, it can be concluded that detected environmental partition coefficients show the clear affinity of surfactants to particulate material. The affinity is higher for cationic surfactants than for other surfactants, as shown by the high partition coefficient values (Table 5.4.1). Partition coefficients are also higher for the water column than for sediments (Table 5.4.1), and it is difficult to offer an explanation for this, bearing in mind the many factors affecting the partition coefficient in both natural water and sediment. 

Each of the properties of the PCB isomers, listed above (Sect. 3.1.2) and either measured or calculated using various equations presented in Sect. 2.1, plays a role in the environmental distribution of these contaminants, especially at air-solid and water-solid interfaces. From the physical and chemical properties specific for PCBs and their isomers (Table 7, Figs. 2-8), the following information evaluates routes by which PCBs are lost from a particular source, spill or environmental compartment, that includes air-solid or aqueous-solid phase interfaces. These include vaporization (i.e., solid— air process), sorption/desorp-tion and partitioning (i.e., water <- solid processes) and biodegradation (i.e., water <- biosolid interactions). 

Lu PY, Metcalf RL, Hirwe AS, et al. 1975. Evaluation of environmental distribution and fate of hexachlorocyclopentadiene, chlordene, heptachlor, and heptachlor epoxide in a laboratory model ecosystem. J Agric Food Chem 23(5) 967-973. 

Caron, G., Suffet, I.H., and Belton, T. Effect of dissolved organic carbon on the environmental distribution of nonpolar organic compounds, Chemosphere, 14(8) 993-1000, 1985. 

Fischer, R.G. and Ballschmiter, K. Prediction of the environmental distribution of alkyl dinitrates - Chromatographic determination of vapor pressure p°, water solubility Sh2o, gas-water partition coefficient Kgw (Henry s law constant) and octanol-water partition coefficient K , FreseniusJ. Anal Chem., 360 769-776, 1998. 

Health Canada provides information on the health effects and environmental distribution of mercury. 

Quantitative estimation of human exposure, environmental release/emissions rates and environmental distribution. This may be achieved through modelling or by field monitoring. 

LOPPI, S. 2001. Environmental distribution of mercury and other trace elements in the geothermal area of Bagnore (Mt. Amiata, Italy). Chemosphere, 45, 991-995. 

---