Making a Choice

With such a wide variety of structures available, it is not surprising that the selection of a suitable surfactant for a given application can become a significant problem in terms of making the best choice of material for a given application. 

If the cost of the surfactant is signihcant compared to that of other components of a system, the least expensive material producing the desired effect will usually be preferred, all other things being equal. Economics, however, cannot be the only factor, since the final performance of the system will be of crucial importance. To make a rational selection of a surfactant, without resorting to an expensive and time-consuming trial-and-error approach, the formulator must have some knowledge of 

The surface and interfacial phenomena that must be controlled in the specific application 

The relationships among the structural properties of the available surfactants and their effects on the pertinent interfacial phenomena to be controlled 

The characteristic chemical and physical properties of the available surfactant choices 

---

The results of the assessment are documented in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which discusses the beneficial and adverse impacts considered to result from the activity. The report is one component of the information upon which the decision maker ultimately makes a choice. A final decision can be made with due regard being paid to the likely consequences of adopting a particular course of action, and where necessary by introducing appropriate monitoring programs. 

Sometimes we must make a choice between two mechanistically reasonable disconnections. How about TM 114 ... 

When you have to make a choice, and don t make it, that in itseffis a choice. 

To select a column for a particular analytical problem, the first step is to make a choice about the pore size(s) to be used for the separation. In general, one cannot expect that a single pore size will fulfill the needs of a separation. In size exclusion chromatography, it is more common that columns of different types are combined with each other to deliver the separation range needed for a particular analysis. Therefore, column banks with different pore sizes are frequently combined with each other to maximize the separation power for... 

The rate terms A [HA] and A [H ][A ] are said to be kinetically equivalent or kinetically indistinguishable. There is no purely kinetic basis upon which to make a choice between them in Chapter 5 we will see why this is so, but a simple interpretation is that the two terms describe equivalent chemical compositions of atoms and charges. 

Although it is not possible in all cases to be specific regarding the choice of anode material, it is possible to make a choice based upon the comparative data which are at present available. Necessary factors of safety would be added to ensure suitability where lack of long-time experience or quantitative data necessitate extrapolation or even interpolation of an indefinite nature. 

A number of physical and mechanical properties of coating metals need to be considered when making a choice of metal to be used in a particular application. 

Many suppliers now offer water treatment for use in refrigeration condenser circuits, and the merits of different methods need to be assessed before making a choice. The reader is referred to specialist works on the subject [10, 19, 21]. 

It is important to point out one of the limitations of mechanism studies. Usually more than one mechanism is compatible with the same experimentally obtained rate expression. To make a choice between alternative mechanisms, other evidence must be considered. A classic example of this situation is the reaction between hydrogen and iodine... 

In the discussion of metallic radii we may make a choice between two immediate alternative procedures. The first, which I shall adopt, is to consider the dependence of the radius on the type of the bond, defined as the number (which may be fractional) of shared electron pairs involved (corresponding to the single, double, and triple bonds in ordinary covalent molecules and crystals), and then to consider separately the effect of resonance in stabilizing the crystal and decreasing the interatomic distance. This procedure is similar to that which we have used in the discussion of interatomic distances in resonating molecules.7 The alternative procedure would be to assign to each bond a number, the bond order, to represent the strength of the bond with inclusion of the resonance effect as well as of the bond type.8... 

Now we can understand the difference between nucleophilicity and basicity. Nncleophilicity measures how fast things happen, which is called kinetics. Basicity measnres stability and the position of equilibrium, which is called thermodynamics. Throughout your course, you will see many reactions where the prodnct is determined by kinetic concepts, and yon will also see many reactions where the prodnct is determined by thermodynamic concepts. In fact, there will even be times where these two factors are competing with each other and you will need to make a choice of which factor wins kinetics or thermodynamics. 

In addition to this, the subtle importance of several other factors warrants due consideration. For example, in making a choice of the proper host attention... 

Notice that in comparisons such as these sometimes slight inconsistencies in the results can be obtained. In two cases A was considered better than B, and B better than C, yet C was judged superior to A This inconsistency or non-transitivity is known as Simpson s or de Condorcet s paradox. In this particular case it can perfectly well be attributed to random variation. Assessors who are not sure about their conclusion are forced to make a choice, which then can only be a random guess. It is possible, however, to obtain results which are conflicting and statistically significant at the same time A < B and B < C, but C < A. This situation may occur when the attribute to be assessed in the comparisons is open to different interpretations. Actually, this is a case of multicriteria decision making (see Chapter 26) and it may be impossible to rank the three products unambiguously... 

Again for the titration of Ce(IV) with Fe(II) we shall now consider constant-potential amperometry at one Pt indicator electrode and do so on the basis of the voltammetric curves in Fig. 3.71. One can make a choice from three potentials eu e2 and e3, where the curves are virtually horizontal. Fig. 3.74 shows the current changes concerned during titration at e1 there is no deflection at all as it concerns Fe(III) and Fe(II) only at e2 and e3 there is a deflection at A = 1 but only to an extent determined by the ratio of the it values of the Ce and Fe redox couples. The establishment of the deflection point is easiest at e2 as it simply agrees with the intersection with the zero-current abscissa as being the equivalence point in fact, no deflection is needed in order to determine this intersection point, but if there is a deflection, the amperometric method is not useful compared with the non-faradaic potentiometric titration unless the concentration of analyte is too low. 

As the first experimental condition in electrogravimetry one makes a choice from two possibilities, viz. ... 

The formation of the stable betaine system P+—C—O—B is the driving force for this reaction. With 4,6-disubstituted ammonium 1,3,2,5-dioxaborataphosphorinanes (108), there is the possibility of making a choice between two reaction directions. The reaction product formed by the phosphorane transition state, as 1,3,2,5-dioxaborataphosphoniarinane... 

We are only allowed to make a choice of route like this because enthalpy is a state function. 

Neither is naming that subjection a straightforward process. This is because our habits of explanation-as citizens, as consumers, and as lawn people—tend to overlook some of the most fundamental players in the process. If I feel I want to apply chemicals and yet am concerned about that fact if I know I am making a choice, but one perhaps not of my own choosing to what actors can I credit this force of desire The most obvious choice, outside of myself, is the industry that depends on my participation. 

Protonated methylcyclopropane [23] might be a comer-, edge-, or face-protonated compound, but, for our purpose, it is sufficient to neglect the distinction between the last two. On the basis of the exchange information, we can make a choice between the comer and edge species. 

Analysis of the poly(methyl methacrylate) sequences obtained by anionic polymerization was undertaken at the tetrad level in terms of two different schemes (10) one, a second-order Markov distribution (with four independent conditional probabilities, Pmmr Pmrr, Pmr Prrr) (44), the other, a two-state mechanism proposed by Coleman and Fox (122). In this latter scheme one supposes that the chain end may exist in two (or more) different states, depending on the different solvation of the ion pair, each state exerting a specific stereochemical control. A dynamic equilibrium exists between the different states so that the growing chain shows the effects of one or the other mechanism in successive segments. The deviation of the experimental data from the distribution calculated using either model is, however, very small, below experimental error, and, therefore, it is not possible to make a choice between the two models on the basis of statistical criteria only. 

One of the equations you need deals with cost, and the other deals with the number of miles. The common element in both equations is the number of gallons of each type of gas — and the number of gallons answers the question, too. Let r represent the number of gallons of regular gas and p represent the number of gallons of premium gas. The total cost, 104.40 = 2.70r + 3.15p. The total number of miles, 748 = 19r + 23p. None of the coefficients of the variables is equal to 1, so you have to make a choice as to which variable to solve for. Because the coefficient 19 is the smallest number, 1 opt to solve for r in the second equation and replace the r in the first equation with that equivalence in terms of p. 

So far we have looked at political behaviour from a somewhat rational perspective. You make a choice about the kind of stance you wish to adopt clever-wise, binary or ternary, enlightened self-interest, read or remain innocent. 

There are two schools of thought in model building. One method is to search for correlations amongst a vast array of physicochemical and structural variables, with no preconceived notion of mechanism. This approach avoids bias and may detect an unexpected relationship, but there is a danger of finding chance relationships that can be misleading (Topliss and Edwards, 1979). The alternative method is to suggest a physical model and make a choice of appropriate descriptors to test that model. 

A number of practical considerations affect the choice of experimental approaches to address a specific question. In general, these practical considerations tend to have a greater impact on applications to toxicology (where specific endpoints may not be measurable in all cell types) than studies of xenobiotic metabolism (where the principal requirement is enzyme activity). However, applications to toxicology should be considered when making a choice of an experimental approach as specific toxicological issues may develop from the metabolism studies or in other aspects of the safety assessment processes. 

When we make a choice, it is easy to see that it extends uniquely. Therefore, we have a unique ( 3,4), 5)-plane 3Ru 4Rq shown on Figure 9.12. 

Therefore, often main attention in studying chemical oscillations is paid to their formal description on the macroscopic level rather than to an attempt to understand in detail the micromechanism of oscillations. It often results in necessity to make a choice between several alternative models suggested for a particular chemical system. It is difficult to restrict ourselves in theory to a definite universal basic model since it can turn out to be either too complicated for studying a particular kind of the autowave processes or, on the other hand, of a limited use due to its inability to reproduce all types of auto-wave processes. 

---