Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Difference schemes

The simplest way to add a non-adiabatic correction to the classical BO dynamics method outlined above in Section n.B is to use what is known as surface hopping. First introduced on an intuitive basis by Bjerre and Nikitin [200] and Tully and Preston [201], a number of variations have been developed [202-205], and are reviewed in [28,206]. Reference [204] also includes technical details of practical algorithms. These methods all use standard classical trajectories that use the hopping procedure to sample the different states, and so add non-adiabatic effects. A different scheme was introduced by Miller and George [207] which, although based on the same ideas, uses complex coordinates and momenta. [Pg.292]

G. Strang On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5 (1968) 506-517... [Pg.410]

The described method can generate a first-order backward or a first-order forward difference scheme depending whether 0 = 0 or 0 = 1 is used. For 9 = 0.5, the method yields a second order accurate central difference scheme, however, other considerations such as the stability of numerical calculations should be taken into account. Stability analysis for this class of time stepping methods can only be carried out for simple cases where the coefficient matrix in Equation (2.106) is symmetric and positive-definite (i.e. self-adjoint problems Zienkiewicz and Taylor, 1994). Obviously, this will not be the case in most types of engineering flow problems. In practice, therefore, selection of appropriate values of 6 and time increment At is usually based on trial and error. Factors such as the nature of non-linearity of physical parameters and the type of elements used in the spatial discretization usually influence the selection of the values of 0 and At in a problem. [Pg.66]

Application of the weighted residual method to the solution of incompressible non-Newtonian equations of continuity and motion can be based on a variety of different schemes. Tn what follows general outlines and the formulation of the working equations of these schemes are explained. In these formulations Cauchy s equation of motion, which includes the extra stress derivatives (Equation (1.4)), is used to preseiwe the generality of the derivations. However, velocity and pressure are the only field unknowns which are obtainable from the solution of the equations of continuity and motion. The extra stress in Cauchy s equation of motion is either substituted in terms of velocity gradients or calculated via a viscoelastic constitutive equation in a separate step. [Pg.71]

A different scheme must be used for determining polarization functions and very diffuse functions (Rydberg functions). It is reasonable to use functions from another basis set for the same element. Another option is to use functions that will depict the electron density distribution at the desired distance from the nucleus as described above. [Pg.236]

The Hq acidity function relates to indicators ionising according to the different scheme B + H+ BH+... [Pg.22]

Other fiber classification schemes have been devised for chrysotile fibers, but historically the QS grade system has been used as a reference other classification schemes usually have correspondence scales for conversion to the QS values. Amosite can be classified according to the QS grade system, but crocidohte requkes a different scheme (mainly due to the harshness of these fibers). [Pg.353]

When two moles of a carbonyl compound are used instead of formalin, the mechanism is different (Scheme 58) (70BSF3147). In one example (80CCC2417) the product of the nucleophilic addition of the hydrazine to the pyrazolinium salt (635 R = = Ph, R = R" =... [Pg.285]

B. van Leer, Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. V.A. Second-Order Sequel to Godunov s Method, J. Comput. Phys. 32 (1979). [Pg.351]

In general, discontinuities constitute a problem for numerical methods. Numerical simulation of a blast flow field by conventional, finite-difference schemes results in a solution that becomes increasingly inaccurate. To overcome such problems and to achieve a proper description of gas dynamic discontinuities, extra computational effort is required. Two approaches to this problem are found in the literature on vapor cloud explosions. These approaches differ mainly in the way in which the extra computational effort is spent. [Pg.104]

Finite-difference schemes used to solve Lagrangean gas dynamics have been described many times (Richtmyer and Morton 1967 Brode 1955, 1959 Oppenheim 1973 Luckritz 1977 MacKenzie and Martin 1982 Van Wingerden 1984 and Van den Berg 1984). [Pg.105]

A drawback of the Lagrangean artificial-viscosity method is that, if sufficient artificial viscosity is added to produce an oscillation-free distribution, the solution becomes fairly inaccurate because wave amplitudes are damped, and sharp discontinuities are smeared over an increasing number of grid points during computation. To overcome these deficiencies a variety of new methods have been developed since 1970. Flux-corrected transport (FCT) is a popular exponent in this area of development in computational fluid dynamics. FCT is generally applicable to finite difference schemes to solve continuity equations, and, according to Boris and Book (1976), its principles may be represented as follows. [Pg.105]

A much more pronounced vortex formation in expanding combustion products was found by Rosenblatt and Hassig (1986), who employed the DICE code to simulate deflagrative combustion of a large, cylindrical, natural gas-air cloud. DICE is a Eulerian code which solves the dynamic equations of motion using an implicit difference scheme. Its principles are analogous to the ICE code described by Harlow and Amsden (1971). [Pg.109]

However, mechanism of this reaction is not quite known and since the same product can be also prepared by the same treatment of the corresponding derivative without the nitroso group 430, the real mechanism can be quite different (Scheme 68). [Pg.237]

A still different scheme is used for the preparation of the benzimidazole buterizine (74). Alk lation of... [Pg.175]

Describe different schemes for immobilizing enzymes onto electrode transducers. [Pg.202]

What confuses this issue somewhat is that an entirely different scheme, with no substrate titration, can also give rise to a downward bend. It is a case of sequential reactions. Perhaps its existence will come as no great surprise, in that the second part of Rule 8 in Section 6.2 implied as much. Consider the following two steps ... [Pg.141]

How does one know when the complete roster of reaction schemes that are consistent with the rate law has been obtained One method is based on an analogy between electrical circuits and reaction mechanisms.13 One constructs an electrical circuit analogous to the reaction scheme. Resistors correspond to transition states, junctions to intermediates, and terminals to reactants and products. The precepts are these (1) any other electrical circuit with the same conductance corresponds to a different but kinetically equivalent reaction scheme, and (2) these circuits correspond to all of the fundamentally different schemes. [Pg.296]

Complex formation, selective precipitation, and control of the pH of a solution all play important roles in the qualitative analysis of the ions present in aqueous solutions. There are many different schemes of analysis, but they follow the same general principles. Let s think through a simple procedure for the identification of five cations by following the steps that might be used in the laboratory. We shall see how each step makes use of solubility equilibria. [Pg.595]

Teachers should be aware of the learning styles of both themselves and their students, being able to accommodate differences between the two. The use and value of different schemes of work involving context-based courses, demonstration lectures and cooperative learning have been provided by Tsaparlis (2008). [Pg.344]

Concerning the numerical accuracy, the closed form solutions of normal surface deformation have been compared to the numerical results calculated through the three methods of DS, DC-FFT, and MLMI. The influence coefficients used in the numerical analyses were obtained from three different schemes Green function, piecewise constant function, and bilinear interpolation. The relative errors, as defined in Eq (39), are given in Table 2 while Fig. 4 provides an illustration of the data. [Pg.124]

Fig. 4—Comparison of relative error for different schemes, (a) A comparison of relative errors for a uniform pressure on a rectangle area 2a X 2b, in which the multi-summation is calculated via DS, FFT, and MLMI, and 1C is determined through bilinear interpolation based scheme, (b) A comparison of relative errors for a uniform pressure on a rectangle area 2ax2fa, in which the multisummation is calculated via DS and 1C is determined through the Green, constant, and bilinear-based schemes, (c) A comparison of relative errors for a Hertzian pressure on a circular region in radius a, in which the multi-summation is calculated via DS, and 1C is determined through the Green, constant, and bilinear-based schemes. Fig. 4—Comparison of relative error for different schemes, (a) A comparison of relative errors for a uniform pressure on a rectangle area 2a X 2b, in which the multi-summation is calculated via DS, FFT, and MLMI, and 1C is determined through bilinear interpolation based scheme, (b) A comparison of relative errors for a uniform pressure on a rectangle area 2ax2fa, in which the multisummation is calculated via DS and 1C is determined through the Green, constant, and bilinear-based schemes, (c) A comparison of relative errors for a Hertzian pressure on a circular region in radius a, in which the multi-summation is calculated via DS, and 1C is determined through the Green, constant, and bilinear-based schemes.
A 5-point finite difference scheme along with method of lines was used to transform the partial differential Equations 4-6 into a system of first-order differential and algebraic equations. The final form of the governing equations is given below with the terms defined in the notation section. [Pg.139]

For large values of z a fully developed case is reached in which the velocities are only functions of r and 0. In the fully developed case the weight fraction polymer increases linearly in z with the same slope for all r and 0. An implicit finite difference scheme was used to solve the model equations, and for the fully developed case the finite difference method was combined with a continuation method in order to efficiently obtain solutions as a function of the parameters (see Reference 14). It was determined that except for very large Grashof... [Pg.345]

An important role in the theory of difference schemes is played by the identities serving on this basis as grid analogs of integration by parts ... [Pg.30]

The requirement a << 1 necessitates making some modifications for stability of this or that difference scheme. As a final result of minor changes, the recurrence formulae have the representations... [Pg.36]

Hyclic elimination method. We now focus the reader s attention on periodic solutions to difference schemes or systems of difference schemes being used in approximating partial and ordinary differential equations in spherical or cylindrical coordinates. A system of equations such as... [Pg.37]

Our account of the theory of difference schemes is mostly based on elementary notions from functional analysis. In what follows we list briefly widespread tools adopted in the theory of linear operators which will be used in the body of this book. [Pg.41]

Grids and grid functions. The composition of a difference scheme approximating a differential equation of interest amouts to performing the following operations ... [Pg.50]


See other pages where Difference schemes is mentioned: [Pg.2369]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.50]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.74 , Pg.78 , Pg.126 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.74 , Pg.78 , Pg.126 ]




SEARCH



Boundary value problems finite difference schemes

Central difference scheme

Conservative difference schemes of nonstationary gas dynamics

Continuity by difference schemes

Difference scheme Crank-Nicolson

Difference scheme additive

Difference scheme alternating direction

Difference scheme conservative

Difference scheme economical

Difference scheme explicit

Difference scheme explicit iteration

Difference scheme factorized

Difference scheme forward

Difference scheme higher-accuracy

Difference scheme homogeneous

Difference scheme implicit

Difference scheme implicit iteration

Difference scheme monotone

Difference schemes as operator equations General formulations

Difference schemes for elliptic equations

Different Schemes of Laser Ablation

Diffusion flux classical finite difference schemes

Divided difference schemes

Economical difference schemes for multidimensional problems in mathematical physics

Euler forward-difference scheme

Finite difference iterative schemes

Finite difference techniques classical schemes

Homogeneous difference schemes for hyperbolic equations

Homogeneous difference schemes for the heat conduction equation with variable coefficients

Homogeneous difference schemes for time-dependent equations of mathematical physics

Homogeneous difference schemes on non-equidistant. grids

Mathematical apparatus in the theory of difference schemes

Maximum tip twist for the different actuation schemes

Methods for designing difference schemes

Operator-difference scheme

Splitting scheme difference

Stability of a. difference scheme

Uniform approximation finite difference schemes

Upwind difference scheme

© 2024 chempedia.info