Layered substrate

Processing variables that affect the properties of the thermal CVD material include the precursor vapors being used, substrate temperature, precursor vapor temperature gradient above substrate, gas flow pattern and velocity, gas composition and pressure, vapor saturation above substrate, diffusion rate through the boundary layer, substrate material, and impurities in the gases. Eor PECVD, plasma uniformity, plasma properties such as ion and electron temperature and densities, and concurrent energetic particle bombardment during deposition are also important. 

Figure 3.27 shows the depth profile of such a layer. Enrichment of Ti and A1 at the layer-substrate interface is visible. The Si signal in the layer increases with depth. It will subsequently be shown that it is not possible to determine from the depth profile alone whether there is diffusion of Si into the CrN layer. 

First, we consider the three-layer (substrate/waveguide film/cover) structure, assuming that the waveguide structure is left alone without any field incident from the outside. The solutions are obtained by using the solution ansatz iJ> comprising plane waves present in the individual layers ... 

The type of adhesion dealt with in the examples in the second paragraph above and Fig. 1 is mechanical or structural while for the lithographic resist adhesion requirements described in this paper a more practical definition of adhesion, one first proposed by Mittal [16], is being referenced and used. Resist patterning layer-substrate adhesion is required only to process or pattern a particular device layer. After the circuit layer is patterned, the resist layer is removed and does not become an integral part of the circuit, as opposed to a PI interlevel metal dielectric layer which does. As such, it is not required to possess high mechanical adhesion strength. In fact, the resist layer must be quantitatively removed after the circuit required layer has been patterned. If the resist layer adheres too well and becomes difficult to remove, it actually interferes with successful circuit fabrication. 

The use of surface analytical techniques in the study of epitaxial growth of Si has been primarily restricted to studies of the factors which affect the growth of a single crystalline layer substrate cleaning, contamination and crystal quality. 

Figure 5.17 Examples and nomenclature of surface layers. Substrate atoms are represented by dots and adatoms by circles. The unit (lxl) mesh of the substrate is shown bottom left...

For epi depositions with arsenic buried layers, we can see the influence of pressure on dopant profile for the SiCI4 process in Figure 19 and for the SiHjC process in Figure 20. In both cases, as the pressure is reduced, the width of the transition region is less. Measurements were made by SIMS. The heavily-doped buried layer substrate is shown on the right-hand side of these figures, and the epi film is on the left. 

Fig. 13.1. Schematic structure of the organic thin-film transistor. Starting from the bottom, the transistor consists of the following layers substrate (brown), gate electrode G, (yellow), gate insulator layer (red), the source, S, and drain, D, electrodes (yellow), semiconductor (grey).

FIGURE 1 shows a typical SIMS profile of Mg in GaN. The Mg concentration was uniformly distributed at a growth temperature of 750°C [8], The concentration of the Mg is 2 - 3 x 101 cm" near the surface and is the same at a depth of 0.4 pm towards the substrate. At the junction between the GaN Mg and undoped GaN buffer, the Mg concentration increases to 1 x 1019 cm 3 and is seen to diffuse into the buffer layer. This Mg peak is probably caused by enhanced diffusion of Mg, associated with defects and dislocations generated at the layer/substrate interface, towards the substrate. A wide chemical doping range in GaN Mg of 1 x 1017to 1 x 1019 cm 3 was obtained. 

FIGURE 4 SIMS profile of a GaN layer grown by MBE on a GaP substrate showing diffusion of impurities from the substrate and the accumulation of impurities at the layer/substrate interface. 

Mulvaney SP, He L, Natan MJ, Keating CD (2003) Three-layer substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering preparation and preliminary evaluation. J Raman Spectrosc 34 163-171... 

For the experiment, bare silicon, thermal oxide (600 nm) and TEOS (1.5 pm) coated silicon, A1 (500 nm) and W (700 nm) deposited wafers were used as substrates. A1 was sputter coated on SiOj and W was prepared by CVD on Ti/TiN (20/60 nm) layers. Substrates were cut into 15 mm x 30 mm for the zeta potential measurements and pre-cleaned before the... 

Fig. 10.7. Dopant profile at the epitaxial layer/substrate interface [21]...

The increase in apparent Km values observed following the immobilization of enzymes is also readily explained by considering local effects at the carrier surface. Recalling the Michaelis-Menten equation (v = Vmax[S]/ m+ [S] ), and its derivation (Chapter 2), we know that for soluble enzymes, Km is independent of enzyme concentration and is a constant under a given set of conditions. Immobilized enzymes suspended in an aqueous medium have an unstirred solvent layer surrounding them, called the Nernst or diffusion layer. Substrates and products must diffuse across this layer, and, as a result, a concentration gradient is established for both substrates and products, as shown in Figure 4.7. 

Fig. 6.27. Pinholes in y-AI2O3 coating (layer 4) on a 3-layer substrate. The pinholes are related to voids in the layer 3 substrate surface (SEM picture).

M.H. Herzog-Cance, D.J. Jones, R.E1. Mejjad, J. Roziere J. Tomkinson (1992). J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 88, 2275-2281. Study of ion exchange and intercalation of organic bases in layered substrates by vibrational spectroscopy. Inelastic neutron scattering, infrared and Raman spectroscopies of aniline inserted alpha and gamma zirconium hydrogen phosphates. 

Fig. 1 (contd.) (b) Tbp view of the bcc( l 11), (100) and (110) surfaces showing the surface unit cell (bold lines) and possible high symmetry adsorption sites. The adsorption sites are B bridge site, H denotes the hollow site. On both the (111) and (100) surfaces the preferred hollow site is the one in which the adatom sits directly above the second layer substrate atom, (c) rlbp view of the hcp(1000) surface showing the surface unit cell (bold lines) and possible high symmetry adsorption sites, The adsorption sites are B bridge site, H denotes the hollow site. 

The tip and substrate current spikes in Figure 46 are generally well correlated (particularly at times greater than 8 s), suggesting that the breakdown of the passive layer (substrate current) involves the release of Fe2+ from the iron surface, which was detected by reduction to Fe(0) at the tip UME. Evidence for the presence of Fe(0) at the tip came from the visual observation of a reddish-brown film at the electrode surface after such measurements and cyclic voltammograms (CVs) recorded with the tip positioned close to the iron surface, before and after a corrosion experiment. Prior to corrosion measurements, the tip CV displayed features consistent only with the reduction of TCA, while after corrosion the CV also showed a cathodic wave, possibly due to the reduction of Fe2+ to Fe and a corresponding anodic stripping peak. The latter occurred at the same potential as the anodic dissolution of iron, and was thus attributed to the reoxidation of Fe(0). Denuault and Tan (68,69) used a similar approach to identify the dissolution products for mild steel subjected to an acidic corrosive environment. In contrast to the work of Wipf and Still, the tip electrode was used only as a detector and not as an initiator of the corrosion process. CVs recorded with the tip placed close to the substrate detected the presence of Fe2+ and H2. 

Release film Adhesive layer Substrate Adhesive layer... 

One federal study reports 185 random incidents in which upholstered furniture was the first item to ignite. In that study the National Bureau of Standards Textile Chemists coded the composition of inner layer substrates. Seven percent were coded as urethane and 13% were combinations of cellulosic and urethane materials. 

Figure 2.13 shows SIMS profiles of the boron and aluminum atoms at different temperatures (2000 and 2200 °C) after diffusion for 10 min into porous SiC layer with a thickness of 2.7 pm. It is clearly seen that the distribution of aluminum atoms in a porous layer is practically uniform and constant for both temperatures, while the distribution of boron atoms is uniform only for the lower temperature of diffusion. At the higher temperature, the maximum concentration of boron atoms is greater near the surface than that after diffusion at lower temperature, and yet it gradually decreases within the porous layer. Note that the concentration of aluminum in the porous layer is the same for both temperatures of diffusion, while the concentrations of boron atoms fit their values for different temperatures only at the interface porous layer-substrate. Once... 

---