International standards assumptions

One advantage of an HPLC analysis is that a loop injector often eliminates the need for an internal standard. Why is an internal standard used in this analysis What assumption(s) must we make about the internal standard ... 

To validate the analytical procedure recovery experiments are performed. To this end, the CRM is spiked with a known mass of the analytes at a variety of concentration levels (at least three different levels) and the concentrations measured are compared to the expected concentrations in at least three separate experiments. The extraction step has been shown to be a critical step in the analytical procedure and it may be responsible for poor recoveries. The efficiency of this step can be assessed either by repetitive extraction of the sample or by the addition of internal standards prior to the extraction step with the assumption that the latter actually represent the behavior of the analytes of interest. 

In order to avoid a lack of consistent literature-based data, the Caco-2 permeability values of our selected compounds were transformed according to the following scheme the majority of compounds with Papp < 4 x 10 6 cm s 1 were classified as poorly absorbed and assigned a score of —1 compounds with Papp > 8 x 10 6 cm s 1 were classified as well-absorbed and assigned a score of +1. Different assumptions were made in special cases, when the experimental protocols were different or no internal standard compounds were used. 

The H NMR shifts (ppm relative to TMS as internal standard) shown in Figure 1 were calculated from the reported shifts (neat compounds ) relative to benzene as external reference under the assumption that internal TMS is shifted 7.26 ppm highfield from external benzene <64HCA942). The shifts for phenyl are the centers of complex signals. 

Many attempts have been made to quantify SIMS data by using theoretical models of the ionization process. One of the early ones was the local thermal equilibrium model of Andersen and Hinthome [36-38] mentioned in the Introduction. The hypothesis for this model states that the majority of sputtered ions, atoms, molecules, and electrons are in thermal equilibrium with each other and that these equilibrium concentrations can be calculated by using the proper Saha equations. Andersen and Hinthome developed a computer model, C ARISMA, to quantify SIMS data, using these assumptions and the Saha-Eggert ionization equation [39-41]. They reported results within 10% error for most elements with the use of oxygen bombardment on mineralogical samples. Some elements such as zirconium, niobium, and molybdenum, however, were underestimated by factors of 2 to 6. With two internal standards, CARISMA calculated a plasma temperature and electron density to be used in the ionization equation. For similar matrices, temperature and pressure could be entered and the ion intensities quantified without standards. Subsequent research has shown that the temperature and electron densities derived by this method were not realistic and the establishment of a true thermal equilibrium is unlikely under SIMS ion bombardment. With too many failures in other matrices, the method has fallen into disuse. 

B. Results obtained as described above are based on the assumption that the entire sample has eluted and the peaks of all of the components have been included in the calculation. They will be incorrect if any part of the sample does not elute or if not all of the peaks are measured. In such cases, and in all methods described above, the internal standard method may be used to determine percentages based on the total sample. For this method, measurements are required of the peaks of the component(s) being assayed and of the internal standard. 

The PCDDs/PCDFs are quantitated by comparing the MS response of the detected analyte relative to the MS response of the appropriate 13C labeled internal standard (Table 2). The responses of both the ions monitored for each analyte are used for quantitation. The labeled internal standards are added prior to sample extraction. Thus, the quantitative results for the native analytes are corrected for the recovery of the internal standards, based on the assumption that losses of the internal standards during sample preparation and analysis are equal to the losses of the unlabeled PCDDs/PCDFs. 

Standard solutions are the fundamental basis for the accuracy of assays. In preparing standards, it is usually necessary to make a number of assumptions, related to the purity and behavior of the standards. Standards and samples are assumed to react with assay reagents in the same way, and matrix effects are assumed absent. Standard solutions should be dilutions of a stock solution of highly purified material. Often, in the case of a hormone or other complex molecule, the standard is assigned a concentration or unit value based on a comparison with a master standard curve prepared from an international standard. 

For the interpretation of the distribution of the carbon isotope ratios within the riverine system investigated two different variations have to be considered. If the mean values summarized from all data of all sampling locations vaiy with a higher deviation than their individual standard deviations as well as the variations obtained from the recovery experiments a significant alteration of the isotopic composition of the contaminants can be inferred. These assumptions were supported by the S13C-values of d34-hexadecane. As expected for the internal standard the variation of the individual data points (standard deviation between 0.5 and 1.4 %o) was in the same range as compared to the standard deviation derived from the data of all sample extracts analysed (standard deviation 0.5 %o). 

As mentioned in the Section 1, physico-chemical methodology for quantitative analysis of plant hormone focuses primarily on GC-SIM, although HPLC with selective fluorescence detection continues to be used for lAA analysis in some laboratories. Procedures, such as the 2-methylindolo-a-pyrone assay for lAA analysis [82], are now rarely utilised. With the exception of ethylene quantification [2] there is little use of non-MS-based GC detection techniques, despite the fact that selective analysis at the picogram level is achieved for ABA with an electron capture detector [83], and lAA and cytokinins with a nitrogen phosphorus detector [84,85]. The reason for the demise of these GC procedures is that the detectors are destructive and this precludes the reliable recovery of labelled internal standards for radioassay and isotopic dilution analysis. The usual compromise was to take two aliquots of the purified samples, one for GC analysis and the other for the determination of radioactivity. The accuracy of this approach is dependent upon the questionable assumption that the radioactivity in the purified sample is associated exclusively with the compound under study. In an attempt to circumvent this problem, a double standard isotope dilution procedure was devised for the quantitative analysis of lAA in which one internal standard was used to correct for losses during sample preparation and a second for GC quantification [86]. This procedure was used in several... 

In this procedure, an element is introduced in known and fixed concentration into both the calibration standards and the samples the added clement must be absent in the original sample. The ratio of the intensities between the dement being determined and the internal standard is the analytical variable. The assumption here is that absorption and enhancement effects are the same for the two lines and that use of intensity ratios compensates for these effects. 

For a given spectrometer, a set t>f relative values of. V can be developed for the elements of interest. Note that the ratio US is directly proportional to the concentration n on the surface. The quantity / is usually taken as the peak area, although peak heights are also used. Often, for quantitative work, internal standards are used. Relative precisions of about 5% are typical. For the analysis of solids and liquids, it is necessary to assume that ihc surface composition of the sample is the same as its bulk composition, l- or many applications this assumption can lead to signiticani errors. Detection of an element hy XPS requires that it be pres-cnl at a level of at least 0.1 %. Quantitative analysis can usually he performed if 5 m of the element is present,... 

Today, atomic emission spectroscopy always makes use of relative quantitation, i. e. unknown samples are quantitatively analysed after calibration with samples of known composition. The most common approach to calibration is internal standardisation. The underlying assumption, introduced by Gerlach in 1925, is that the ratio of the analyte mass to the mass of the internal standard, matching the analyte in its chemical properties, emission wavelength, energy of the line, and ionisation... 

The International Standard Organization (ISO) developed a corrosivity classification system verified through exposure that has been carried worldwide. The ISO classification system is based on the assumptions that only the time of wetness and the concentration of pollutants in the atmosphere, SO2 and chlorides, control the corrosion rates of metals. Table 10.1 shows the Hst of ISO standards related to atmospheric corrosion of metals [39]. 

The assumption of independence between hazards and safety instrumented function failures seems very realistic. (NOTE If control functions and safety functions are performed by the same equipment, the assumption may not be valid Detailed analysis must be done to insure safety in such situations, and it is best to avoid such designs completely.) When hazards and equipment are independent, it is realized that a hazard may come at any time. Therefore, international standards have specified that PFDavg is an appropriate metric for measuring the effectiveness of a safety instrumented function. 

Each of the solutions is based on the assumption that the charging effect appearing on the reference substance is the same as that for the sample under study. However, the validity of this assumption is more or less limited. The charging effect appearing on the internal standard will perfectly coincide with that on the sample only if these two substances are situated in a common phase. This condition is met if... 

---