Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Matrix similar

A matrix [/Il is said to be similar to a matrix [B] if there exists an invertible matrix [P] such that [Pg.516]

The above transformations are called similarity transformations and are very important in developing solutions to systems of coupled differential equations. [Pg.516]

Similar matrices have the same characteristic equation and, therefore, the same eigenvalues. [Pg.516]


From these results it can be postulated that for oxidic glasses a fixed proportion of sputtered secondary neutrals is emitted in an excited state. Such linearities can only be determined for similar matrices, which limits the use of D-factors to sample systems similar to the reference sample system used for the D-factor determination. [Pg.246]

The similarity matrices are constructed by one in-house program developed inside CHIRBASE using the application development kit of ISIS. They contain the similarity coefficients as expressed by the Tanimoto method. In ISIS, the Tanimoto coefficients are calculated from a set of binary descriptors or molecular keys coding the structural fragments of the molecules. [Pg.113]

It is this set of polynomials, uniquely defined for all similar matrices, which effectively determines the complete dynamics. [Pg.263]

Shannon, C. E., 190,195,219,220,242 Shapley, L. S316 Skirokovski, V. P., 768 Shortley, O. H., 404 Shot noise process, 169 Shubnikov, A. V., 726 Shubnikov groups, 726 Shubnikov notation for magnetic point groups, 739 Siebert, W. M., 170 Signum function, 313 Similar matrices, 68 Simon, A408 Simplex method, 292 Simulation, 317... [Pg.783]

In contrast to the requirements for enforcement methods and to ensure sufficient quality of the generated data, validation data should be submitted for all types of crop samples to be analyzed. However, matrix comparability and a reduced validation data set may be considered where two or more very similar matrices are to be analyzed (e.g., cereal grain). A reduced sample set may also be acceptable (two levels, at least three determinations and an assessment of matrix interference) provided that the investigated samples belong to the same crop group as described in SANCO/825/00 (see also Section 4.2.1). [Pg.34]

The determination of LOD and/or LOQ is not officially required. In a ring test of more than 10 laboratories initiated in 1992 by the Society of German Chemists [Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (GDCh)] it was shown that these characteristics differ between laboratories by about one order of magnitude, even if the same pesticides are determined in similar matrices with the same method and calculation of the LOD or LOQ is performed in an identical way. [Pg.127]

Purify the derivative by gel filtration using a PBS buffer or another suitable buffer for the particular protein being modified. The use of a desalting resin (e.g., Excellulose, Thermo Fisher) or similar matrices with low exclusion limits work well. To obtain complete separation, the column size should be 15-20 times the size of the applied sample. Fluorescent molecules often nonspecifically stick to gel filtration supports, so reuse of the column is not recommended. [Pg.419]

United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (Hatayama et al., 1980) has provided a matrix for determining the compatibility of hazardous wastes. Interactivity of substances has been presented with the consequences of the reaction such as heat formation, fire, rapid polymerization, formation of flammable gases etc. Also other similar matrices exist e.g. Chempat (Leggett, 1997). [Pg.52]

So, S.S. and Karplus, M. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices and genetic neural networks. 2. Applications. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 4360-4371. [Pg.239]

T. Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices. [Pg.454]

Similarity transformation, 87, 92,101,412 Similar matrices, 87,101-102 Simultaneous linear equations, 15-16, 87 Singlet, 58,310-311 Singly excited function, 311 Singularity, 17 SI units, 23... [Pg.249]

If we take a square matrix S and form the product T 1ST, where T is any nonsingular square matrix, we have carried out a similarity transformation on S if R = T-lST, then R and S are similar matrices. Similar matrices have equal traces. The proof uses (2.15) ... [Pg.298]

In the Jacobi method, a series of similarity transformations is carried out. It is easily proven that similar matrices have the same eigenvalues. Let A = P, BP. The eigenvalues of A satisfy the secular equation (2.38) ... [Pg.305]

Prove that similar matrices have equal determinants. [Pg.308]

Square matrices A and B, both of size n, with A = X 1BX for a nonsingular n by n matrix X are called similar matrices. Similar matrices thus represent the same linear transformation, but with respect to different bases of Rn if X 7- In, the n by n identity matrix. [Pg.541]

The first "real-sample" application is given in Table IX, where chlorpyrifos was extracted from treated grass supplied by an outside collaborating laboratory. Two instruments were used for this application, extracting 11 samples on 4/26/89 and 8 samples on 10/13/90. The relative standard deviations were 3.9% and 1.7% respectively. The latter value is extraordinarily good since, in the work reported, precision due to the chromatographic analysis variability was between 1% and 3%. Further, the values of precision reported by the supplier for manual extraction of chlorpyrifos from similar matrices, leaves and roots, were 8% and 4% respectively. [Pg.283]

Empirical Methods. The empirical methods use calibration standards to derive sensitivity factors that can be used to determine the unknown concentration of given elements in similar matrices [3. The sensitivity factors are derived from calibration curves that plot measured secondary ion intensities versus the known concentration of standards. Three types of sensitivity factors have been used the absolute sensitivity factor, the relative sensitivity factor, and the indexed relative elemental sensitivity factor. [Pg.168]

Kubinyi, H., Hamprecht, F.A., Mietzner, T. Three-dimensional Quantitative Similarity-Activity Relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL Similarity Matrices./. Med. Chem. 1998, 47, 2553-2564. [Pg.246]

Many attempts have been made to quantify SIMS data by using theoretical models of the ionization process. One of the early ones was the local thermal equilibrium model of Andersen and Hinthome [36-38] mentioned in the Introduction. The hypothesis for this model states that the majority of sputtered ions, atoms, molecules, and electrons are in thermal equilibrium with each other and that these equilibrium concentrations can be calculated by using the proper Saha equations. Andersen and Hinthome developed a computer model, C ARISMA, to quantify SIMS data, using these assumptions and the Saha-Eggert ionization equation [39-41]. They reported results within 10% error for most elements with the use of oxygen bombardment on mineralogical samples. Some elements such as zirconium, niobium, and molybdenum, however, were underestimated by factors of 2 to 6. With two internal standards, CARISMA calculated a plasma temperature and electron density to be used in the ionization equation. For similar matrices, temperature and pressure could be entered and the ion intensities quantified without standards. Subsequent research has shown that the temperature and electron densities derived by this method were not realistic and the establishment of a true thermal equilibrium is unlikely under SIMS ion bombardment. With too many failures in other matrices, the method has fallen into disuse. [Pg.189]

Examples of potential interferences for As are 43Ca160160+, 40Ar35Cl+, and 38Ar37Cl+. These interferences cannot be separated from analytes using a Q detector because of the insufficient resolution power. Many papers in the literature report different interferences when measuring As in similar matrices. This is because the extent and magnitude of interferences depend on the ICP-MS used, the type of nebulizer, the plasma torch conditions, the mass to final dilution volume, and the analyte concentration being measured [55, 56]. [Pg.571]


See other pages where Matrix similar is mentioned: [Pg.41]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.1729]    [Pg.307]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 , Pg.192 ]




SEARCH



Basis Change and Matrix Similarity

Benzoic similarity matrices

Carrier similarity matrices

Dayhoff similarity matrix

Eigenvalue analysis similar matrices

Electronic similarity matrices

Electrostatic similarity matrices

Intermolecular Similarity Matrix

Lipophilicity similarity matrices

Matrix similar matrices

Matrix similar matrices

Matrix transformation elementary similarity

Molecular quantum similarity matrix

Neural similarity matrices

Nonlinear similarity matrices

Quantum similarity matrix

Receptor similarity matrices

Similarity matrix

Similarity transformation matrix

Similarity transformation similar matrices

Steroids similarity matrices

Stochastic Manipulations and Graphical Representations of the Similarity Matrix

Toxic similarity matrices

Triazines similarity matrices

Unitary Similarity Diagonalization of a Square Hermitian Matrix

© 2024 chempedia.info