Internal failure costs

Failure costs - Internal failure costs are essentially the cost of failures identified and rectified before the final product gets to the external customer, such as rework, scrap, design changes. External failure costs include product recall, warranty and product liability claims. 

Pc - internal failure cost due to rework at the end of the production line Pc - external failure cost for return from customer inspection 10 Pc - external failure cost for warranty return due to failure with customer in use. 

Internal failure cost is the cost when you discover, before release a laboratory report or an analysis certificate that something has gone wrong. 

What gets measured gets done. The health of the quality system and the effectiveness of the quality plan need to be monitored. Therefore selecting the right set of quality metrics is important.Traditionally quality costs are broken down into preventive, appraisal, internal failure, and external failure costs. A commonly used indirect measure of internal failure costs is not-right-first time. Cycle time is another useful indirect measure of quality. Process quality can be measured. Processes can be rated on a 1-5 scale where ... 

Cost must be understood in the context of quahty. If quahty means conformance to requirements, then quality costs must be understood in terms of costs of conformance and costs of nonconformance, , as illustrated in Figure 19-1. In industrial terms, costs of conformance are divided into prevention costs and appraisal costs. Costs of nonconformance consist of internal and external failure costs. For a laboratory testing process, calibration is a good example of a cost incurred to prevent problems. Lhcewise, quality control is a cost for appraising performance, a repeat run is an internal failure cost for poor analytical performance, and repeat requests for tests because of poor analytical quality are an external failure cost. 

Prevention costs Appraisal costs Internal failure costs External failure costs... 

Internal failure costs are incnrred to discover and remedy unacceptable data before they leave the laboratory. 

The ultimate consequence of this approach is that quality improvement wUl lead to cost reduction (Crosby 1979 Garvin 1984b), which is achieved by lowering internal failure costs (e.g., scrap, rework, and spoilage) and external failure costs (e.g., warranty costs, complaint adjustments, service calls, and loss of goodwill and future sales) through prevention and inspection. 

They are the operating quality costs of prevention and appraisal that are considered to be controllable quality costs. Add that in year 2000 the IRS decided to let companies deduct ISO 9000 costs as a business expense. Also there are the internal and external failure costs. As the controllable cost of prevention and appraisal increases, the uncontrollable cost of internal and external failure decreases. At some point the cost of prevention and appraising defective product exceeds the cost of correcting for the product failure. This point is the optimum operating quality cost. 

Internal failures must be thrown out or recycled. These should all be detected in products where a batch can be sampled and tested. External failures are much more serious and costly, although it is not always easy to quantify the cost. In the case of a "normal" product, the customer will return it. If he is really unhappy he will not buy it again. If a batch of medicine is faulty, the F.D.A. (to name but one national authority) may recall it. If the agency is really unhappy about the company s structures, procedures, and methods, it may well take stronger action. 

Internal failure Disposal of defective materials and/or equipment Extra training costs Repeat analysis Time spent on internal investigation Time/revenue lost because of interruption of sample diroughput... 

Internal/external failure costs. These are costs incurred because of failures that are identified before they reach the customer and failures that have reached the customer. 

Process mapping Supply chain management Supply chain map Acquisition costs Possession costs Application costs Inspection costs Internal/external failure costs... 

Failure costs rework and bad planning, nonproductive times by errors in production, time to examine the causes and consequences of failures, lack of work and accidents, obsolete resources, deficient utilization of resources and external services, delays of supplies, inefficient communication and affections in computer systems, contract errors, bhhng errors, loss of income, imcollectable debt, discounts of fees, customer complaints, time consumed in internal complaints and solving the problem escalated by customer, penalties, loss of market and company reputation. 

The costs of prevention and appraisal are easily quantifiable and, predictable according to historic and tendencies. Inside costs of failure there are some similarly quantifiable, but there are others intangible and difficultly anticipated, which reflect possible affections or impacts. We will consider that tangible costs are produced mainly in P+A costs, and intangible costs are circumscribed to failure costs such as costs ofpub-licity to restore and increment competitive position, internal motivation, image and market share due to lack of quality. 

List the key elements of the internal and external failure costs in your organization. 

Internal and external failure. Internal costs are scrap, rework and the associated costs of not getting it right the first time. External failure costs are rectification after products have reached the final customer, such as warranty claims, returns and repairs. 

Up to 90% of the total quality cost is due to failure, both internal and external, with around 50% being the average (Crosby, 1969 Russell and Taylor, 1995 Smith, 1993). A survey of UK manufacturing companies in 1994 found that failure under the various categories was responsible for 40% of the total cost of quality, followed by appraisal at 25%, and then prevention costs at 18%. This is shown in Figure 1.6. Of the companies surveyed, 17% were unsure where their quality costs originated, but indicated that these costs could be attributable to failure, either internally or externally. 

Suppose a particular fault in a product is not detected through internal tests and inevitably results in a failure severity S = 5. If around 80% of failures are found by customer testing and 20% are warranty returns, then the expected cost on average for one fault will be 2.8Pc, from Figure 1.13. If the product has been designed such that Cpi = 1.33, or in other words, approximately 30 parts-per-million (ppm) failures are expected for the characteristic which may be faulty, then for a product costing 100 the probable cost of failure per million products produced would be 8400. 

For compressors in general and for some types in particular, the cleanliness of the gas stream is the key factor in a reliable operation. Moisture or liquids in various forms may be the cause of an early failure or in some-cases a catastrophic failure. Corrosive gases require material considerations and yet even this may not entirely solve the loss of material issue that can certainly cause early shutdowns or failures and high maintenance cost. Fouling due to contaminants or reactions taking place internal to the ( i-pressor can cause capacity loss and the need for frequent shutdowns. 

Lower cost per fL of heat-transfer surface. Replaceable straight tubes allow for easy internal cleaning. Full tube bundle minimizes shell-side bypassing. No packedjoints or internal gaskets, so hot and cold fluids cannot mix due to gasket failure. 

A failure to install a necessary softener is ultimately reflected in higher bills for maintenance, repairs, and water treatment chemical products and services. Scaling can still occur with soft, lean waters, and the cost of additional fuel over a year probably would pay for several water softeners. In addition, the control of internal water chemistry becomes more difficult than it might otherwise be, which places an additional operational burden upon the facility. 

Following an EAL approach, traditionally regulatory systems originate from the presence of market failure in our specific case, the environment appears as a "public good" that may not be appropriated and has no market price the damage to the environment is a case of "externality," in that it is fully or partly a social cost that is not internalized into the accounts of the parties causing it.2 So the comparison of different instruments can consider how they may play a role in correcting malfunction and subsequent inefficiencies [7]. 

Only after acceptance/approval has been obtained in writing from all necessary external and internal agencies should the installation begin. The failure to do so could result in delay of the project, major changes after the system has already been installed, or inadequate protection. The contractor would likely wish to pass any additional costs along to the owner. 

Prevention and appraisal costs are the costs of assuring quality, and internal and external costs are the failure and scrap costs. Added together, these produce the total costs. 

---